Ranaldo Bairn Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 So Sakala would not have lost his balance if it had not been caused by Starfelt sliding in. Thanks for confirming it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 1 hour ago, Mr. Alli said: His foot was taken away because he stood on Starfelt's moving foot. It's really not difficult to see or understand. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derry Alli Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 Just now, kingjoey said: His foot was taken away because he stood on Starfelt's moving foot. It's really not difficult to see or understand. Which is why it's clearly a penalty. Why was Starlfelts foot in a position for Sakalas foot to be "taken away". It's easily one of the most clear cut penalties in Britain this weekend. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Brees Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 3 minutes ago, Mr. Alli said: Which is why it's clearly a penalty. Why was Starlfelts foot in a position for Sakalas foot to be "taken away". It's easily one of the most clear cut penalties in Britain this weekend. Absolute stonewaller, imho. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 13 minutes ago, Mr. Alli said: Which is why it's clearly a penalty. Why was Starlfelts foot in a position for Sakalas foot to be "taken away". It's easily one of the most clear cut penalties in Britain this weekend. It’s like dancing with your weans feet on yours at a perty. Basically Sakala is a fucking toddler. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derry Alli Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 8 minutes ago, Henrik's tongue said: It’s like dancing with your weans feet on yours at a perty. Basically Sakala is a fucking toddler. Had to read that twice there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 2 minutes ago, Mr. Alli said: Had to read that twice there. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1GregStewart Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 1 hour ago, Grangemouth Bairn said: FTFY. Yeah, much better. Thanks 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 Mental that people are claiming that the Starfelt/Sakala incident was anything but a stonewaller. The Goldson handball is also a pen for me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squonk Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 I'm in a small (but correct) minority with @kingjoey on this one. Sakala instigated the contact, not Starfelt. If Sakala had stepped onto the defender's knee instead, a metre off the ground, rather than stood on his foot, only for Starfelt's knee to slide away, are you seriously saying Starfelt should be penalised? Starfelt didn't cause the contact that resulted in Sakala hitting the deck; Sakala did. Blaming Starfelt is like blaming Rory McKenzie for headbutting Ethan Erhahon's elbow in another weekend game. Starfelt's schoolboy error was giving a well-known Ibrox-leaning official a clear and obvious opportunity to wrongly award his heroes a penalty. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJF Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 Starfelt stopped Sakala from being able to plant his foot correctly. Without Starfelt’s challenge, Sakala doesn’t lose his footing. Simple as that, really. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squonk Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 Sakala didn't plant his foot correctly because Starfelt's foot was in the place he wanted to plant it. Instead, he stood on Starfelt's foot. Simple as that really. Are you seriously trying to tell me that Starfelt should have chosen a different place to stand in order not to inconvenience Sakala, who had some kind of priority despite arriving second? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 Anyone who thinks its not a penalty genuinely must never have watched a game of football before in their life. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJF Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 4 minutes ago, Squonk said: Sakala didn't plant his foot correctly because Starfelt's foot was in the place he wanted to plant it. Instead, he stood on Starfelt's foot. Simple as that really. Are you seriously trying to tell me that Starfelt should have chosen a different place to stand in order not to inconvenience Sakala, who had some kind of priority despite arriving second? I suggest you watch it back. Starfelt makes contact with Sakala’s boot before he is able to plant it on the ground, sweeping it from the side. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 4 minutes ago, Squonk said: Are you seriously trying to tell me that Starfelt should have chosen a different place to stand in order not to inconvenience Sakala, who had some kind of priority despite arriving second? Only problem is that he was infact flying into a badly timed slide tackle, not standing... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squonk Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 Just now, RandomGuy. said: Anyone who thinks its not a penalty genuinely must never have watched a game of football before in their life. That is simply your subjective opinion, not an indisputable fact. Opinions are like arseholes - everybody's got one, and I fully support your right to hold the wrong opinion. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 celtic never won a game so this rumble on and on for the next few weeks. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squonk Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, bennett said: celtic never won a game so this rumble on and on for the next few weeks. Personally, I'd be happy seeing the stadiums of both arse cheeks closed down for their fans' behaviour so it's nothing to do with Celtic not winning. Nice try though. Edited January 4, 2023 by Squonk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 2 minutes ago, Squonk said: Personally, I'd be happy seeing the stadiums of both arse cheeks closed down for their fans' behaviour so it's nothing to do with Celtic not winning. Nice try though. Never said anything about you, that looks like you've got a guilty conscience. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 4, 2023 Share Posted January 4, 2023 8 minutes ago, bennett said: celtic never won a game so this rumble on and on for the next few weeks. Good as a win though. Felt like a win 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.