Jump to content

Goodwin's last team vs Goodwin's last but one team


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, craigkillie said:

It's 100% deliberate, I don't think anyone can seriously believe otherwise. The only question is whether it is violent conduct or not, and the wording of that rule is that any deliberate contact with the arm on the head or face will be violent conduct unless it is considered "negligible". So basicall you're asking the question of whether it's negligible or not.

He is running at full speed like a train and trying to ride the blatant block by Dunne. The latter disna have a cut, bruise, or a keeker. It was a glancing contact by virtue of the circumstances. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, IrishBhoy said:

This Aberdeen TV commentary is going to be glorious. 

Just watched 5 minutes of them at half time saying it should have been a foul for Aberdeen.

And they’ve just said it was a ‘Save from Carson’ when the officials gave a corner for it hitting the bar.

Glorious indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, craigkillie said:

It's 100% deliberate, I don't think anyone can seriously believe otherwise. The only question is whether it is violent conduct or not, and the wording of that rule is that any deliberate contact with the arm on the head or face will be violent conduct unless it is considered "negligible". So basicall you're asking the question of whether it's negligible or not.

Can't really see how that could be classed as negligible. Although I don't know the specific definition of "neglible" if there is one in the laws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, 10menwent2mow said:

We won't appeal because there is no point. I can see why it's been given but as I say, he'll serve a 3 matcher for violent conduct, when its not that in my opinion. Let's face it, you'd be raging if it was given against you and I'm raging because it's been given against us. 

Havent had the pleasure of a replay of the tackle that the saints guy got booked for from behind but it looked a shocker. 

Because the decision is correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...