Jump to content

Celtic v Rangers April 8th


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, AJF said:

Again, you are focusing on the position and haven’t explained why that matters if he is a goal threat.

You’ve also overlooked the point I was making about using arbitrary time periods to make a point. Since Beale was appointed, Kyogo has scored 70% of Celtics goals against us. See how easy that was to twist? 

Because again it is obvious to anyone but you. Your attacking players are contributing the square root of f**k all to these games so for Celtic it’s a case of stop Tav stop Rangers but you seem to be happy your strikers and wingers misfire in these games and quite at peace with your right back doing the job of them all and failing the do the basics of being a defender 😉

We are talking about this season in its entirety ffs, a clearly defined period and not one just pulled out of thin air so not really arbitrary is it?

And since Beale joined 😂 Since Beale joined you have fallen further behind and picked up another losers medal. Probably best not to start any sentence with since Beale joined tbh

Edited by Jinky67
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jinky67 said:

Yeah I assumed they picked him up to fill the gap kind of left by Aribo but he has nothing about him whatsoever. Raskin did look pretty tidy tbf, a more mobile Lundstram with better passing. 

A better midfield would have punished Celtics sloppy passing in the first half yesterday. There was numerous occasions where a Rangers player intercepted a pass in midfield only to make a dogs dinner of it by the time they had reached Celtics 18 yard line. 
 

Rangers need to bite the bullet and get shot of guys like Barasic, Davies, Sakala, Morelos, Wright, Jack, McGregor, possibly even Tavernier and Goldson too. Players that evidently aren’t good enough to compete with this Celtic team, and are a million miles away from the standard required in the Champions League. Obviously it would cost far too much money to try and replace all those with players of a higher standard, but the longer that group hang around and stink the place out the longer Celtic will dominate domestically. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jinky67 said:

Because again it is obvious to anyone but you. Your attacking players are contributing the square root of f**k all to these games so for Celtic it’s a case of stop Tav stop Rangers but you seem to be happy your strikers and wingers misfire in these games and quite at peace with your right back doing the job of them all and failing the do the basics of being a defender 😉

We are talking about this season in its entirety ffs, a clearly defined period and not one just pulled out of thin air so not really arbitrary is it?

And since Beale joined 😂 Since Beale joined you have fallen further behind and picked up another losers medal. Probably best not to start any sentence with since Beale joined tbh

But you didn’t stop Tav 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IrishBhoy said:

A better midfield would have punished Celtics sloppy passing in the first half yesterday. There was numerous occasions where a Rangers player intercepted a pass in midfield only to make a dogs dinner of it by the time they had reached Celtics 18 yard line. 
 

Rangers need to bite the bullet and get shot of guys like Barasic, Davies, Sakala, Morelos, Wright, Jack, McGregor, possibly even Tavernier and Goldson too. Players that evidently aren’t good enough to compete with this Celtic team, and are a million miles away from the standard required in the Champions League. Obviously it would cost far too much money to try and replace all those with players of a higher standard, but the longer that group hang around and stink the place out the longer Celtic will dominate domestically. 

Yeah I think the thing that surprised most of us was just how poor our passing was, I think our pass % was in the 70’s and the volume of mis-placed passes under no pressure was both frustrating and bemusing at times. We were there to be had yesterday imo but thankfully what we were was clinical with our chances which is something we have failed to be at times. We found a way to win it which is a good place to be and psychologically damaging to Rangers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, AJF said:

But you didn’t stop Tav 😂

I know and we still won the game rather comfortably whilst being a bit pish as Tav played his part in giving us 2 back 😉. Imagine if you had a secondary threat you could rely on in these games and you might have gotten a point but you don’t, you have Tav and it isn’t enough 

But you seem happy to that you only have 1 attacking option in these games and that because of that you have dropped another title and trophy to us and you will drop another unless you fix that particular problem

Edited by Jinky67
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, RuMoore said:

Never in my life have I seen someone so clearly rattled when their team has actually won a big game against their rivals. 

It wasn’t a big game, Stormzy. League was already won. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, bennett said:

Strange that a team as great as celtic are, have to resort to pressurising and influencing referees.

Just you keep your eye out for that letter Rangers are writing to the powers that be :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Elric said:

Some Rangers fans have a short memory - look back to earlier this season when Morelos was given a soft penalty for having his shirt tugged against Livingstone.  Surely these things even themselves out over a season!

Shoosh. We all know the season is only 4 games long!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bennett said:

Do you seriously think he's going to say that we're going humped and don't stand a chance. 

He could say f**k all. 
 


This was before the game, 

29EA5042-5592-4932-B212-0A51A0BAB559.jpeg

Edited by Drew Brees
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Drew Brees said:

Will they ever learn? This c**t has lost 18 derbies. 

CD491248-DB6E-45EB-BEB1-E85D09F1AAE4.jpeg

The headline vs the quote.

It’s disappointing to come away with nothing,” Tavernier said.

“We wanted to come away with three points.  

“We’ve obviously got an important game against them in three weeks' time, so if we take the positives out of this game and apply ourselves in the same way – with a bit more – then I’m really confident in the team. 

“Our next game, the St Mirren game, is important because we need a run of consistency going into the semi-final. 

“It’s obviously a massive game in three weeks. But St Mirren is massive because we need to get back to winning ways and work on ourselves.  

“But, yeah, three weeks’ time is obviously massive, and we’ve got to make sure we get in the final.”

 

Probably the reason you sent a screenshot rather than the link.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...