FK1Bairn Posted Sunday at 15:42 Share Posted Sunday at 15:42 As much as I despite Man City, that's absolutely the correct decision to award the goal. Silva does bump Sa but Sa's not coming for the corner, there's a clear gap between them at the point Stones heads the ball and Sa has a clear view of the ball the full time. He's never saving the header anyway and there's no way Silva is interfering. The main complaint Wolves have is the timing of the goal being pretty much the last kick. If that happens in the opening 10 minutes they've got a chance to get back in to the game 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartsOfficialMoaner Posted Sunday at 15:50 Share Posted Sunday at 15:50 Pool v Chels pretty boring so far 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted Sunday at 16:00 Share Posted Sunday at 16:00 The length of time it now takes for penalties to be taken is ridiculous. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eez-eh Posted Sunday at 16:00 Share Posted Sunday at 16:00 That probably is a (soft) penalty but it was only a matter of time once they started throwing themselves about and got the crowd raging. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
senorsoupe Posted Sunday at 16:19 Share Posted Sunday at 16:19 Why did the Chelsea goalie need to do that? It's another pretty soft one though 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ro Sham Bo Posted Sunday at 16:21 Share Posted Sunday at 16:21 Dean has gone from Sanchez "wiping out" Jones to "inevitable coming together". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
senorsoupe Posted Sunday at 16:21 Share Posted Sunday at 16:21 OK on second look that's no pen, correct call to overturn 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eez-eh Posted Sunday at 16:21 Share Posted Sunday at 16:21 Just now, Ro Sham Bo said: Dean has gone from Sanchez "wiping out" Jones to "inevitable coming together". Funnily enough he changed his view as soon the referee went to the monitor. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewDon Posted Sunday at 16:22 Share Posted Sunday at 16:22 I enjoyed Dean changing his mind about the decision mid-sentence when he realised that it was going to an on-field review. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eez-eh Posted Sunday at 16:22 Share Posted Sunday at 16:22 (edited) “He got the ball” does seem to now only work with goalies. In the middle of the pitch that’s probably a foul. Edited Sunday at 16:23 by eez-eh 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
senorsoupe Posted Sunday at 16:23 Share Posted Sunday at 16:23 Just now, eez-eh said: “He got the ball” does seem to now only work with goalies. In the middle of the pitch that’s probably a foul. Goalies always get preferential treatment 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19QOS19 Posted Sunday at 16:23 Share Posted Sunday at 16:23 Just now, eez-eh said: “He got the ball” does seem to now only work with goalies. In the middle of the pitch that’s probably a foul. If they gave that then goalkeepers would need to be instructed not to go to ground ever. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19QOS19 Posted Sunday at 16:24 Share Posted Sunday at 16:24 Just now, senorsoupe said: Goalies always get preferential treatment You watched a penalty shootout? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim McLean's Ghost Posted Sunday at 16:26 Share Posted Sunday at 16:26 (edited) 3 minutes ago, eez-eh said: “He got the ball” does seem to now only work with goalies. In the middle of the pitch that’s probably a foul. The keeper is entitled to hold his ground when he plays the ball. He didn't catch him with studs or lunge into the tackle so what has he done wrong? Edited Sunday at 16:26 by Jim McLean's Ghost 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eez-eh Posted Sunday at 16:31 Share Posted Sunday at 16:31 2 minutes ago, 19QOS19 said: If they gave that then goalkeepers would need to be instructed not to go to ground ever. Just now, Jim McLean's Ghost said: The keeper is entitled to hold his ground when he plays the ball. He didn't catch him with studs or lunge into the tackle so what has he done wrong? You’re doing an awful lot of inferring there. I don’t care that Liverpool didn’t get it after they’ve been chucking themselves about all first half, it’s just notable how differently those tackles are refereed when it a goalkeeper or someone else. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itzdrk Posted Sunday at 16:31 Share Posted Sunday at 16:31 Thought it was soft on first viewing but I'd be screaming for it if it was against Ayr. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loonytoons Posted Sunday at 16:34 Share Posted Sunday at 16:34 I'd rather they called it a pelanty than a pen. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim McLean's Ghost Posted Sunday at 16:38 Share Posted Sunday at 16:38 1 minute ago, eez-eh said: You’re doing an awful lot of inferring there. I don’t care that Liverpool didn’t get it after they’ve been chucking themselves about all first half, it’s just notable how differently those tackles are refereed when it a goalkeeper or someone else. I don't think the keeper is getting preferential treatment. It is very rare you see an outfield player tackle like that where they want to keep their whole body in front of the player AND spread themselves into a low base. If it is two out field players they would clash body to body. You see this a lot with wingers taking on full backs and usually the attacker is penalised for essentially barging through a legal tackle. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19QOS19 Posted Sunday at 16:39 Share Posted Sunday at 16:39 6 minutes ago, eez-eh said: You’re doing an awful lot of inferring there. I don’t care that Liverpool didn’t get it after they’ve been chucking themselves about all first half, it’s just notable how differently those tackles are refereed when it a goalkeeper or someone else. I wasn't trying to be funny. Goalkeepers have always been allowed to slide in like that to take the ball. If they were to say that's a penalty after the GK clearly got the ball first then they'd have to change what GKs are allowed to do. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richey Edwards Posted Sunday at 16:44 Share Posted Sunday at 16:44 The offside flag is up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.gif.8d9573f316fd83891c47780e3f603d15.gif)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.