glensmad Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 8 minutes ago, GordonS said: Time will tell. Oi. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago So did the SFA definitely open up for new applications and if so do we know of any clubs who applied? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glensmad Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, welshbairn said: So did the SFA definitely open up for new applications and if so do we know of any clubs who applied? Yes and no. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, glensmad said: Yes and no. Is there any evidence of it other than the boy on Non League Matters? Can't find anything on the SFA site. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairWeatherFan Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 6 minutes ago, welshbairn said: Is there any evidence of it other than the boy on Non League Matters? Can't find anything on the SFA site. What kind of evidence are you looking for beyond a league office holder confirming? There's never been anything on the SFA site open or closed. You'd have to be directly involved with a club or league. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clansman Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago (edited) Drumchapel said they had in recent press report on the addition of cover Edited 2 hours ago by clansman 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 6 minutes ago, FairWeatherFan said: What kind of evidence are you looking for beyond a league office holder confirming? There's never been anything on the SFA site open or closed. You'd have to be directly involved with a club or league. I've no idea of prorege's status, it just seems odd that he seems to be the only source of information on it, and no word from clubs applying. I don't get the need for secrecy, clubs haven't been shy about revealing their plans in the past, and the SFA make the rest of the licensing process and criteria abundantly clear in minute detail. I'm happy to accept prorege word for it though, I'm not familiar with the forum. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Pennel Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago I don't think he means Prorege. He means Glensmad has confirmed it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Pennel Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago I don't think he means Prorege. He means Glensmad has confirmed it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairWeatherFan Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 5 minutes ago, welshbairn said: I've no idea of prorege's status, it just seems odd that he seems to be the only source of information on it, and no word from clubs applying. I don't get the need for secrecy, clubs haven't been shy about revealing their plans in the past, and the SFA make the rest of the licensing process and criteria abundantly clear in minute detail. I'm happy to accept prorege word for it though, I'm not familiar with the forum. I'm talking about Glensmad. There has also been anecdotal evidence of clubs talking about works related to getting licensed. Like Drumchapel adding cover. There's never been a centralised source for this kind of information as clubs are at a variety of stages. Its not a neat box tick spreadsheet for stattos like the list of licensed clubs or a manual . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GNU_Linux Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, Black Pennel said: I don't think he means Prorege. He means Glensmad has confirmed it. 12 minutes ago, Black Pennel said: I don't think he means Prorege. He means Glensmad has confirmed it. Can you confirm that Glensmad has confirmed that which needs confirmation about being confirmed 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago League office holders should have wee ITK badges below their avatars imo, like the blue ticks on twitter before Musk put them up for sale. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leaguereformer Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 9 minutes ago, welshbairn said: League office holders should have wee ITK badges below their avatars imo, like the blue ticks on twitter before Musk put them up for sale. Should they really be commenting on such a forum? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, leaguereformer said: Should they really be commenting on such a forum? Yes, the more transparency the better. The recent trend to secrecy breeds mistrust. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leaguereformer Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, welshbairn said: Yes, the more transparency the better. The recent trend to secrecy breeds mistrust. Ironically you talk of mistrust, have Glencairn not repeatedly signed players under false pretences and put them on 2 year deals when they were told they were signing 1 year. Yes players should check however there is no secret that in recent years they have been bad for this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Pennel Posted 41 minutes ago Share Posted 41 minutes ago 1 hour ago, GNU_Linux said: Can you confirm that Glensmad has confirmed that which needs confirmation about being confirmed I'm doubly sure he gave confirmation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossilYM Posted 24 minutes ago Share Posted 24 minutes ago 42 minutes ago, leaguereformer said: Should they really be commenting on such a forum? Time will tell. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted 16 minutes ago Share Posted 16 minutes ago 41 minutes ago, leaguereformer said: Ironically you talk of mistrust, have Glencairn not repeatedly signed players under false pretences and put them on 2 year deals when they were told they were signing 1 year. Yes players should check however there is no secret that in recent years they have been bad for this. That's clearly a private matter between club and player, nobody else's business unless they're in a player's union. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inanimate Carbon Rod Posted 4 minutes ago Share Posted 4 minutes ago Quite a fair amount of slanderous stuff coming from the reformer again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.