GordonS Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago (edited) 32 minutes ago, theoriginalhedge said: With big Dunc willing to work for free and being the first to be punted I really do fear for ICT My guess is either he wasn't prepared to keep working without a wage indefinitely, or the deal was that he would be made good later and he's now a creditor. He was probably on a much bigger contract than they need for a manager in L1. I wouldn't read too much into him being let go. Edited 16 hours ago by GordonS 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde01 Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 5 hours ago, theoriginalhedge said: With big Dunc willing to work for free and being the first to be punted I really do fear for ICT Probably just taking the opportunity, free or not he’s a donkey. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago 7 hours ago, theoriginalhedge said: With big Dunc willing to work for free and being the first to be punted I really do fear for ICT Big Dunc will get paid in full for the term of his contract, before any other creditors, unless ICT are liquidated. The football authorities insist on that if ICT are going to continue in Scottish football. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted 49 minutes ago Share Posted 49 minutes ago 8 hours ago, welshbairn said: Big Dunc will get paid in full for the term of his contract, before any other creditors, unless ICT are liquidated. The football authorities insist on that if ICT are going to continue in Scottish football. That depends on whether his contract has a break clause of any sort - they're clearly not going to have to pay more than if they sacked him in normal circumstances. It also wouldn't have to be "before any other creditors". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB1994 Posted 18 minutes ago Share Posted 18 minutes ago 31 minutes ago, craigkillie said: That depends on whether his contract has a break clause of any sort - they're clearly not going to have to pay more than if they sacked him in normal circumstances. It also wouldn't have to be "before any other creditors". I'm sure Gardiner took great delight in stating that Ferguson had signed a 3 year deal with no break clauses when his appointment was announced. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.