Jump to content

Rugby Union


kiwififer

Recommended Posts

I suspect World rugby might use this as an argument for their rejigged yearly schedule that was voted down a while back.

I can see the benefit of their proposals, particularly for the tier 2 Nations but it does risk completely ruining the 6 Nations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said:

Literally nobody is saying anything different.

The argument is, if it wasnt capable of being played today, the game shouldve been moved or delayed and not just voided without even attempting to get it on, that's the complaint.

Sport is littered with these kinds of rule anomalies, from the Italians beating the USSR in the Euro68 SF by the toss of a coin to manipulation of the substitute rule in cricket in order to keep bowlers fresh, to boxing scorecards.

Granted, World rugby made the error of having the tournament here in typhoon season but would have been criticised for having it anytime between December and April (when the weather is more suitable), for ruining the 6 Nations or Club season.

Moving the games is easier said than done as most of the venue's have been affected by the typhoon. Not to mention that the infrastructure has taken a battering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The outcry of hatred towards us over here in New Zealand is something else. They want us to get pumped. I feel that they will get their wish.
Everybody in world rugby apart from us is desperate to see Japan win.
f**k New Zealand. They won't be happy unless they get a bye to the final, then be allowed to play a 13 man Namibia with Glenn Jackson refereeing.
I have to echo these sentiments. When I visited NZ, I was so taken by their sense of smug entitlement that I genuinely wanted England to beat them on their tour that was happening. And I usually want England to lose at everything (yes I am bitter, petty and small minded)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m genuinely at a loss as to how we’re the villain here. People could perhaps see Dodson’s comments as insensitive, and I fully expected the worldwide audience to be supporting Japan anyway even without there having been any threat to the game taking place, but this is so clearly an open and shut case of World Rugby and no one else being in the wrong.

Having such a back and forth over whether the game will be on isn’t the SRU’s fault, it’s World Rugby. The focus being distracted from public safety isn’t Scotland’s doing, it’s World Rugby. Italy being kicked out of the tournament days before they were meant to play while the Scotland game was given until hours before kick off to give it every chance wasn’t due to Scotland demanding favourable treatment, it was due to World Rugby giving favourable treatment to New Zealand as a matter of policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

The hypocrisy from England and New Zealand fans is a joke - they'd be the first to moan if their game had been threatened and it meant they were going to be put out.

 

 

This.   And the organisers would have swiftly found alternative arrangements to get their games played "for the good of the tournament".   Scotland, on the other hand, aren't box-office enough for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sjc said:

Sport is littered with these kinds of rule anomalies, from the Italians beating the USSR in the Euro68 SF by the toss of a coin to manipulation of the substitute rule in cricket in order to keep bowlers fresh, to boxing scorecards.

Granted, World rugby made the error of having the tournament here in typhoon season but would have been criticised for having it anytime between December and April (when the weather is more suitable), for ruining the 6 Nations or Club season.

Moving the games is easier said than done as most of the venue's have been affected by the typhoon. Not to mention that the infrastructure has taken a battering.

There will be games going ahead next weekend regardless. You seem to be absolutely desperate to make it clear you're in Japan and how terrible it all is, and how great the people are there.

Frankly its nothing to do with this. Our game was scheduled today, if its cancelled it's a week until the next game, I doubt any "infrastructure" that's taken a battering will be down for more than a day or two, so theres no reason they couldnt have delayed cancelled games until Tuesday, even if it means moving it to other parts of the country where the storm hit earlier.

This is the issue. This is the complaint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

The quotes on that thread from All Blacks fans are just laughable.

The biggest set of whingers ever in world rugby.

Do they actually see us a threat? Or just a slightly harder path than Japan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven’t read the entire thread, so apologies if this has already been mentioned. Someone told me yesterday that prior to the tournament taking place, all the competing nations signed contracts with World Rugby. Part of those contracts covered the cancellation of games, and how points would be awarded. All nations agreed to this and signed the contracts.

Now, if this is true, that was the time for concerned nations to say ‘no, not signing that, we should look to move cancelled games, or delay them by a day or two, and if that cannot happen, then cancel the game and void the result’. Apparently, Scotland signed up to exactly what might have been the situation with our game against Japan today. A kick in the baws for any nation unlucky enough to have it happen to them, but frankly, just a case of ‘nae luck’.

Is it true that all nations signed contracts that agreed pool games, cancelled in the event of fire, flood, pestilence, typhoons or Dave King turning up at Narita airport, wouldn’t be moved or delayed, but declared null and void?

If so, why did we threaten legal action and go full-on ‘big hoose must stay open’ on everyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...