Jump to content

Kenny_m

Gold Members
  • Posts

    1,911
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kenny_m

  1. 26 minutes ago, Skyline Drifter said:

    It's clearly Peterhead. Tribunal related to lost earnings compared to what he would have been earning at Airdrie. QoS are not relevant.

    Decent part time wage then, even though full time at Airdrie wouldn't exactly be a 40 hour week and i wouldn't imagine he was one of Airdrie's highest paid players.

    No wonder Calum Fordyce has to cut hair one day a week!

  2. 49 minutes ago, Kenny_m said:

    Why was Stuart Millar involved in the tribunal? Was the Quitongo affair not well after he left?

    Fair play to him for his apparent backing of the club though.

    Another interesting fact about the Quitongo tribunal was his salary:

    Airdrie £375 per week + £25 appearance money.

    His new club (Could be QOS or maybe Peterhead) £323.08 per week.

    No wonder he had an alleged sideline!

  3. 13 hours ago, Mr November said:

    We definitely wouldn’t have conceded our second goal up at Dundee with Currie in goals, he’d never be that far off his line! I’m looking forward to seeing Rae when he’s fully fit, a confident and competent keeper would make a big difference to a team that is very much prone to making daft choices.

    Sort of linked to Stuart Millar but I liked the bit where it mentioned the relationship between the agent and Murray was strained because of a player not being selected the previous season. Looking at who else is on that agency I think the player in question is Eoghan Stokes and I’m not sure there was much of an argument for him to play more often.

    Why was Stuart Millar involved in the tribunal? Was the Quitongo affair not well after he left?

    Fair play to him for his apparent backing of the club though.

  4. 1 hour ago, Diamonds are Forever said:

    Are people seriously debating whether Ballantyne deserved that 2nd yellow? It's as blatant as they come, takes the easy option of deliberately stepping towards the Dundee player to stop his run instead of actually turning and going with the runner. He is a total liability, 3 red cards by November is unacceptable (or at least would be in a team where we had an alternative..).

    Yip and i'm pretty sure our manager doesn't agree either.

  5. 20 minutes ago, Jack Reed said:

    You will be right I will be pish as you say, time will tell, 

    The club chose to go down the young manager route at least we can give him a chance. He hasn't even had a full summer transfer window to work with yet as many decisions were made before his appointment therefore it would xmas 2023 before i would even be reviewing his position.

    There is of course the fact that he is also very important experienced player who we wouldn't want to lose. (and his cousin)

  6. 1 hour ago, Mybitchunderprotest said:

    I wouldn't be holding my breath however awaiting a statement from the club at this time while the various organisations supporting Quitongo examine the full written judgement and hopefully when it is issued it doesn't refer to "vindication".

    While i have been critical of the communication from the club i would totally agree in this instance, silence is the way to go.

     

  7. 1 hour ago, Diamond1924 said:

    Well, a positive result in the eyes of the club. 

    Wish Rico all the best in the future as there’s nothing wrong with standing up against racism (regardless if you think it never happened). 
     

    He’s certainly spread the word that fans should be held accountable for their actions which can only be good news. 
     

    Hopefully the club release a statement updating the support and begin to move on from this one.

    Will you now be leaving this forum given this is what brought you here? It appears you are disappointed with the outcome.

  8. 1 hour ago, Airdrie76 said:


    Good news for the club - and Board - hopefully an end to this.
    I’ve read the STV report on it too and neither is giving much away in terms of what was said by the tribunal.
    However what we do appear to have is a pile on which seems to ignore that the tribunal decision went against Rico Quitongo. Be nice to see some balance and detail of the judgement itself.

    https://news.stv.tv/west-central/rico-quitongo-unsuccessful-in-racial-discrimination-claim-against-former-club-airdrie

    Edited to add this link as actually has some detail: https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/ex-airdrie-star-rico-quitongo-28572606

    Great news even though the "pile on" is not a surprise. He seen an opportunity to make some money which has now backfired and i doubt anyone one will touch him when his QOS contract ends, career over! Rascals them Quitongo boy's.

  9. 2 minutes ago, She who dares gins said:


    The club dealt with it privately and perhaps the way to try and resolve it was privately.

    Mmmm,  perhaps Gary didn't do the correct thing by publishing the letter but he was obviously livid as Airdrie are a huge part of his life.

    So yes, Airdrie should now send him another "private" letter withdrawing his ban and we'll all move on. They don't even need to admit they overreacted.

  10. 22 minutes ago, Diamonds02 said:

    True, but to be fair he is also locked in an expensive legal case because he refused to label us as racists without any evidence. 

    Mistakes have definitely been made but when people say he has 'contempt' for the fans I can't agree.

    He could've saved a lot of time and money if that were the case.

    Perhaps but it’s clear from “Sarah’s” posts that it’s now very personal. 

×
×
  • Create New...