Jump to content

pleslie99

Gold Members
  • Posts

    5,030
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by pleslie99

  1. There has never been any such interpretation that a player needed to foul with intent for it to be a penalty or free kick. A foul's a foul regardless of intent. I'd say the majority of fouls are a result of players genuinely going for the ball and missing doesn't make it any more or any less a foul.
  2. St Pats v Dumbarton Accies is tie of 4th round by a country mile. Will be hundreds at the common for that! Oban v Shortlees another cracker.
  3. Regardless of whether he's going for the ball or not., it makes no odds. He didn't touch the ball but did the player, if that's in the other box were screaming for it and demanding its a stonewaller. I dont blame Brett long it's a ball he has to go for and was there to be won, the striker just got there 1st.
  4. Just watched the highlights to see the penalty. Soft but it looks a pen to me, striker nicks the ball 1st so correct call. We were lucky to avoid a pen earlier in the game for the Carswell handball, couldn't have argued had that been given either, very clumsy. All in all a decent point.
  5. We couldve told u duffball was like that!
  6. I love a cup tie but clyde away at Hamilton is very unappealing, would love us to go through but can't help but struggle to get motivated for it. I also hate NDP (or whatever its called these days)
×
×
  • Create New...