Well I am assuming the article wasn't directed at me, I would agree.
I haven't seen anyone deny the financial benefit for clubs like Peterhead etc having you in town, but if they have then from a financial perspective they are wrong, because it would be stupid to suggest otherwise. But I stress financial there, your presence probably also denied them any chance of winning the league that year, but that is semantics and not something I wish to get into.
I could be wrong about this being a troll but given this thread is 99.9% mud slinging between Rangers supporters and diddies, and Bennett's tendency to like a wind up, the article felt distinctly like an attempt to generate a diddy reaction.
I may be a cynical p***k but my guess is the Sun has published that article in an attempt to pander to its populace of readers, i.e. not the lower league clubs who have benefitted but to the Rangers support who want to feel vindicated by their existence in the lower leagues.
It reads very much like all of these clubs should just be thankful that you graced them with your presence, it seems sycophantic and disingenuous.
Like I say, I'm not going to deny the financial gains for these clubs but similarly I find the whole article a bit distasteful and I still don't really see the point of it.