Jump to content

The Falkirk FC Thread


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Russ said:

Really hope with Henderson being fit again doesn’t mean Leon McCann will get dropped again. He’s been absolutely class the last few weeks probably our best player since he came back into the team and from what we’ve seen so far he’s a much better left back than Mackie.

I’d also hope he keeps Oliver playing in the middle of the park. Really like what I’ve seen from him this season although it’s clear he’s not a striker but had his best game for us so far playing as a number 8 last week and more than deserved to keep his place.

Suspect Henderson will come into midfield in the 'Hetherington' role.  McGlynn will want Mackie to play so if Henderson doesn't move to midfield then think he'll push Mackie to LB and drop McCann which would be harsh.  Of course he might have a stinker today and make McGlynns choice much easier come next week.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Tea and Busquets said:

Anyone know why the floodlights were lit at 2am this morning? All along the main stand and the two free standing ones. Seems like a bit of a waste burning them unless emergency work was being done? 


The Rawlins private jet landed there this morning after a miscommunication with Edinburgh airport. 
 

Pitch will be in tatters 😡

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Proudtobeabairn said:

Suspect Henderson will come into midfield in the 'Hetherington' role.  McGlynn will want Mackie to play so if Henderson doesn't move to midfield then think he'll push Mackie to LB and drop McCann which would be harsh.  Of course he might have a stinker today and make McGlynns choice much easier come next week.  

With the squad we have it should be a back 3 with wing backs all day long. Probably depends on Williamson's fitness though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, ShaggerG said:

With the squad we have it should be a back 3 with wing backs all day long. Probably depends on Williamson's fitness though. 

You keep pushing this. McGlynn has rarely played 3 at the back - it isn’t going to happen any time soon IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, ShaggerG said:

With the squad we have it should be a back 3 with wing backs all day long. Probably depends on Williamson's fitness though. 

I don't know that 3 at the back would be good.  At the moment its 4 at the back with left and right back pushing forward leaving 2.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Ecosse83
1 hour ago, ShaggerG said:

With the squad we have it should be a back 3 with wing backs all day long. Probably depends on Williamson's fitness though. 

That’s about the 50th time you’ve posted that, it’s not going to happen FFS. Mcglynn knows how he wants to play and it’s great we have a good manager that won’t chop and change formations! Let it be man (am I allowed to say man these days 🤔😂)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said:

You keep pushing this. McGlynn has rarely played 3 at the back - it isn’t going to happen any time soon IMO

 

21 minutes ago, JulioBairn said:

3 at the back is pish. Can we leave it at that. 

 

44 minutes ago, Ecosse83 said:

That’s about the 50th time you’ve posted that, it’s not going to happen FFS. Mcglynn knows how he wants to play and it’s great we have a good manager that won’t chop and change formations! Let it be man (am I allowed to say man these days 🤔😂)

Well, excuuuussse me for having an opinion. Didn't know I wasn't allowed one.

I, at no time, said that McGlynn would play it, but I do think that it would get our best players on the pitch in their best positions.

In the meantime, get it up ye!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, latapythelegend said:

I'm in the 3 at the back camp. We have a left back and a right back who are better attacking threats than defensive ones so utilising them as wing backs would be good. We also have an abundance of full backs when they are all actually fit. 

It won't happen but I would like to see it.

Careful now.

I completely agree of course. I'm assuming you're meaning centre backs though? A back three of Donaldson, Henderson and Mackie would stroll through games IMO (assuming the formation suits them). I think four at the back lends itself more to having two defensive midfielders which aren't needed. Only my opinion of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, ShaggerG said:

 

 

Well, excuuuussse me for having an opinion. Didn't know I wasn't allowed one.

I, at no time, said that McGlynn would play it, but I do think that it would get our best players on the pitch in their best positions.

In the meantime, get it up ye!

Take away the Airdrie game we have lost one goal from open play all season. Why would anyone with any nouse change that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Ecosse83
1 hour ago, ShaggerG said:

 

 

Well, excuuuussse me for having an opinion. Didn't know I wasn't allowed one.

I, at no time, said that McGlynn would play it, but I do think that it would get our best players on the pitch in their best positions.

In the meantime, get it up ye!

Yes how very dare you have an opinion that’s different from mine 😉, tbf your logic is right but Mcglynn won’t change things just now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...