sjc Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 (edited) 4 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: I am. Thanks. I have said for years that I've favoured the Micawber model of football finances. So is the plan to have one of these "no new money into the Club" share issues every year in order for your Clubs directors get their money back for the soft loans they continually have to provide to keep the lights on through the season? Seems a bit short sighted to me. Edited June 26, 2017 by sjc 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 (edited) 7 minutes ago, sjc said: So is the plan to have one of these "no new money into the Club" share issues every year in order for your Clubs directors get their money back for the soft loans they continually have to provide to keep the lights on through the season? Seems a bit short sighted to me. I think the plan is to have a self-subsisting model. This seems sensible.. Edited June 26, 2017 by The_Kincardine 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 4 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: I think the plan is to have a self-subsisting model. This seems sensible.. First time for everything I suppose.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 4 minutes ago, sjc said: First time for everything I suppose.... Well no really. We had that for decades before The Mint. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 5 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: Well no really. We had that for decades before The Mint. You mean the decades that were Celtics most successful decades? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 1 minute ago, sjc said: You mean the decades that were Celtics most successful decades? No. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Just now, The_Kincardine said: No. You sure about that Kincy? 1960-1986 League Titles: Celtic - 14 Rangers - 6 Aberdeen - 3 Dundee Utd -1 Dundee - 1 Hearts - 1 Kilmarnock - 1 Let's not forget they won the European Cup and made a 2nd Final a few years later as well as numerous semi finals. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 4 minutes ago, sjc said: You sure about that Kincy? Absolutely sure. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: Absolutely sure. Go to bed Kincy, you're drunk. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, sjc said: Go to bed Kincy, you're drunk. Don't be even cheaper than you usually are, buddy. Come back to me when you learn to use the apostrophe. However, if you've anything sensible to say I am willing to listen. Edited June 26, 2017 by The_Kincardine -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 1 minute ago, The_Kincardine said: Don't be even cheaper than you usually are, buddy. Come back to me when you learn to use the apostrophe. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 1 minute ago, sjc said: So much for diddy discourse. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: So much for diddy discourse. In fairness, even the Diddy teams won more league titles than Rangers during the pre Minty decades that you aspire to return to. Diddy discourse indeed. Edited June 26, 2017 by sjc 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, sjc said: In fairness, even the Diddy teams won more league titles than Rangers during the pre Minty decades that you aspire to return to. I don't 'aspire' to return anywhere but your comment is risible. Are you pretending to be stupid or is this your natural disposition? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 37 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: I think the plan is to have a self-subsisting model. This seems sensible.. If the plan has been implemented already then it's not being used is it? The step up to the Premiership came with a shit load of extra income that should have been the business model shouldn't it? The board mouther should have informed Ra Peepol that he was implementing a living within it's means financial model and that the clubs debts would be serviced so as not to hamper the clubs spending at a later date and that the extra cash would then be invested into the club. But no, King had to peddle the "Going for 55" pish and from the interim accounts and that more soft loans were issued recently he has spent all and more or the extra revenue pursuing the dream and receiving the glory if he somehow managed to stop Celtic getting ten in a row. It appears from first glance and a bit of guess work that if The Rangers had increased the players wage budget by £2 million last season they could have easily made a profit of a few million if they just ignored chasing the dream. Catch 22 time, your club is in one hell of a sticky situation. If the club doesn't spend on players by a healthy amount compared to Celtic and secondly everyone else in the league the glory hunters will not buy ST's or attend and the club doesn't make as much. If the club spends and spends then they will buy ST's. There is no middle ground with your mob which is why it is most likely to down the shitter like the last one because The Rangers fans expect more than the club can afford. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 16 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: Don't be even cheaper than you usually are, buddy. Come back to me when you learn to use the apostrophe. However, if you've anything sensible to say I am willing to listen. Ah, the old miss-used apostrophe comfort zone for when you have made a rip roaring c**t of yourself. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Just now, The_Kincardine said: I don't 'aspire' to return anywhere but your comment is risible. Are you pretending to be stupid or is this your natural disposition? No, you said you want to see your Club return to an era where they were self sustainable. I merely pointed out that this coincided with you rivals most successful period and even the Diddy teams collectively won more league titles than Rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 1 minute ago, sjc said: No, you said you want to see your Club return to an era where they were self sustainable. I merely pointed out that this coincided with you rivals most successful period and even the Diddy teams collectively won more league titles than Rangers. I can only conclude that you can't read and are confusing "decades before" with "the decade before". In ether case you're wrong. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 (edited) 13 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: I can only conclude that you can't read and are confusing "decades before" with "the decade before". In ether case you're wrong. You want to refer to a time (pre 60's) where players salaries were limited by the maximum wage? No wonder your Club was self sustainable back then. Edited June 26, 2017 by sjc 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, sjc said: You want refer to a time (pre 60's) where players salaries were limited by the maximum wage? No wonder your Club was self sustainable back then. OK now I know it's just because you can't read. Forgive me for taking you seriously for a while. Go back to having your Sevco wankfest with your pals. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.