monrovianmonk Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 How do we get UEFA / FIFA involvement in this to save our game from corruption? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Don't think the'tache will be agreeing to jackshit. Don't think big boss tam would approve. I was thinking the same. Odd though that Petrie is specifically mentioned by name. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sting777 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 My e mail is off....BOMBARD THEM!!! info@scottishfa.co.uk info@scottishfootballleague.com 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny van Axeldongen Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Calm down guys. Rangers are dead. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punk_dfc Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Just getting the feeling Scottish football fans are going to get stitched up by these short-sighted plans. The relentless bending over backwards to save Newco may be the final nail in the coffin of Scottish football. If these proposals go through, thousands of fans will be lost for good. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever Diamond Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 I know FIFA said they were quite happy to let the SFA deal with this situation themselves,but the fact they haven't and aren't doing anything...i rephrase that,anything that isn't looking to fastrack a tax dodging cheating club back into the top flight asap.....I do hope they step in soon before civil war is declared in the Scottish football world. We have become the laughing stock on the playing field,and this is only adding to it for our off field game as well.It is a joke,and should never have been allowed to continue for as long as it has done. Not only is our game in bad need of a complete restructure,so is the SFA.A complete clear out,and new representatives put in place is what is required. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookies Love Me Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 From the rules of the SPL: C4.5.1 Subject to Rule C4.5.2 fee payments ('Parachute Payments") shall be made for each of the two Seasons following relegation to any Club relegated from the League from time to time of the lesser of £250,000 and 1.63% of the Net Commercial Revenues in the Season following relegation and the lesser of £125,000 and 0.82% of the Net Commercial Revenues in the second Season following relegation. The Parachute Payments payable for each Season shall be paid to the appropriate Club(s) at the commencement of the relevant Season(s) following relegation. C4.5.2 In the event that a Club is promoted to the League, after having been relegated for only one Season, it shall not receive any Parachute Payment in respect of the second Season after its relegation. If they are classed as "relegated" would they be hard necked enough to invoke these clauses???? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgm Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Rangers should start at div 3. However, didnt airdrie utd start in div 2 after buying out clydebank? Sure that was the case. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well Well Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Well it appears the proposals are going down like a lead balloon with those on Rangers Media as well. Hopefully they will block this as well 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forkboy Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Rangers should start at div 3. However, didnt airdrie utd start in div 2 after buying out clydebank? Sure that was the case. Yes. But Sevco haven't bought a 1st Division side, instead the authorities are just going to gerrymander the league system to slot them in there. Farce. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drooper Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 How do we get UEFA / FIFA involvement in this to save our game from corruption? We're a footballing backwater. I don't think they'll give two shites, to be honest. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broken Algorithms Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Rangers should start at div 3. However, didnt airdrie utd start in div 2 after buying out clydebank? Sure that was the case. That was because they took the place of Clydebank in the second. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacobite_Dundee Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 I've managed to find the relevant excerpt from the SFL Regulations: "Para 13.5.1872 Crawling Back In the event of an ill-managed club trying to wangle its way back into the Scottish Football League after having previously broken away in a huff because it wasn't getting enough money, it shall: a) commence running b) launch itself into the air The aforementioned club shall be eligible, however, to take a place at the back of the queue and quietly and properly make an application to join the Scottish Football League, along with nice little clubs like Cove Rangers and Spartans. Such applications will be considered taking into account each club's recent history of shafting the rest of Scottish football and tarnishing its reputation. In order to comply with the Equality Act 2010, any penalties or being telt imposed on one of Glasgow's sectarian twins will be applied to the other as well." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monrovianmonk Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Rangers should start at div 3. However, didnt airdrie utd start in div 2 after buying out clydebank? Sure that was the case. Yes but Sevco have not bought another club. They are a brand spanking new club who have NEVER played a game and want access to the First Division. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambomaggie Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Sorry to interrupt the thread at such a time but does anyone else think the name "Leggoland" may be a breach of copyright? I have sent an email to Lego asking them. That is truly pathetic of you if true. -3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever Diamond Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Rangers should start at div 3. However, didnt airdrie utd start in div 2 after buying out clydebank? Sure that was the case. Yes we did,and you answered the question why? yourself.We bought out another club. A sad situation which was forced on us due to 3 year audit,not wanting us to look like a pheonix club,also the fact they slated our fanbase and weren't prepared to see it rekindled. In other words,much the same as the situation with Sevco,only they seem to be bending over and taking it up the pipe for them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomogganners Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Hidden webcam of SPL Chairmen getting briefed by Doncaster 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well Well Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Yes but Sevco have not bought another club. They are a brand spanking new club who have NEVER played a game and want access to the First Division. Problem is in the eyes of the SFA they are one and the same and always will be. They know that if they don't recognise this then they lose the Rangers fans. The rangers fans are worth more to them than all the other clubs in the nation put together. Never forget this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broken Algorithms Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Grant Russell @STVGrantWe've asked the SPL to explain how Rangers can be relegated to the SFL when Dunfermline have already been. Let's see. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinnesTON Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Is this a spread the blame stitch up , the SPL have done their bit and the SFL will say there was nothing we could do our hands were tied. Everyone can blame each other while pertaining a sense of doing all they could. Spl say we expelled the newco, SFL saying the newco were relegated. The whole thing looks and smells like an appeasement for the Sky deal . Which would say that Sevco will be getting more favourable decisions to ensure promotion. There is no incentive for the diddy teams to continue the SFL should just refuse relegation for Sevco and keep the hypocrisy in one league. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.