Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

Aw be fair on the poor wee halfwit It's just sinking in that the Glorious Victory didn't really improve their situation and, in fact, could help make things even more embarrassing for them. No rallying cries or future visions from Charlie Boy to cling onto, either. Bennett's backed himself into a corner, and the deflector shields are crumbling. Expect more lies, abuse and whataboutery over the coming days and weeks. If he sticks around that is.

The last couple of days Bennett's been rattling like a smackhead on his first night in chokey. His usual backup crew are no use to him - one look at a 145 page document full of big words and they shat it, going straight into "Grab the headline and ignore the rest" mode - unfortunately "the rest" makes a bit of a mockery of the headline. I'm not sure they understand "Pyrrhic" as a concept. They certainly don't understand the verdict document.

Then wee Cammy came along and reminded us of the sheer shite they gave these EBTs to, and some of the more interesting ones - did nobody tell Souness he's not allowed to be employed by two clubs at the same time? Once BDO start the recovery operation, are all those players bound by some code of Omerta to rangers, or will they drop the dead club further into the shite in order to save their money?

It looked as if £444 was the bargain of the century, but what if one or two of those ex-players hung onto their copy of the side-letters?

On the contrary - the verdict document clearly indicates that Rangers won the appeal.

Are you still struggling with the outcome? Feeling somewhat stupid because of your faith in the bungler, runaway and IRA man? And, as a consequence, so angered by this startling turnaround that you have now invested yet more (blind) faith in the new nameless, faceless emperors of the plastics and diddies?

Perhaps you are even working with them - keeping things 'upfront and centre' with those who 'take you seriously'.

laugh.gif

No further questions, M'Lud. laugh.giflaugh.giflaugh.giflaugh.giflaugh.giflaugh.giflaugh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My God the usual suspects are still keeping up the fight .... i loved when they were compared to the Japanese jungle fighters but it looks like we will have to get mcconville and phil 3 nsmes to come out of hiding to tell them it is all over

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My God the usual suspects are still keeping up the fight .... i loved when they were compared to the Japanese jungle fighters but it looks like we will have to get mcconville and phil 3 nsmes to come out of hiding to tell them it is all over

HMRC may appeal.

Dual contract investigation.

BDO rummaging around in the bottom drawers at Ibrox.

Chuckie's share issue.

Is it over?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My God the usual suspects are still keeping up the fight .... i loved when they were compared to the Japanese jungle fighters but it looks like we will have to get mcconville and phil 3 nsmes to come out of hiding to tell them it is all over

Yes indeed,they are - and now you've come back to join them.

All over? If you accept that rangers are in fact dead, then you're nearly right. They are in liquidation, heading for the morgue as we speak. Again, the partial exoneration delivered last week was about as good for rangers as a pardon was for Timothy Evans.

On the other hand, if you cleave (as you appear to) to Charlie's World of Stories and Wonder, then I think you'll find there's a long and twisty path ahead for the Tribute Act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed about 30 pages back (struggling to keep up!) in a list of people who should apologise over this entire saga that some Rangers fans included Hutton, just wondering if any of them want to elaborate why? My understanding of his conduct was that he stood up to the other SPL 11 who wanted Rangers squeezed in to the First Division, something which Rangers fans were more or less in agreement with since their preferred option was to start again in Div 3. Maybe I'm wrong? I realise it was some of the real roasters in here who said it but if its not just a case of 'he's no one of us so must be one of them' then I'd be interested to hear their reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed about 30 pages back (struggling to keep up!) in a list of people who should apologise over this entire saga that some Rangers fans included Hutton, just wondering if any of them want to elaborate why? My understanding of his conduct was that he stood up to the other SPL 11 who wanted Rangers squeezed in to the First Division, something which Rangers fans were more or less in agreement with since their preferred option was to start again in Div 3. Maybe I'm wrong? I realise it was some of the real roasters in here who said it but if its not just a case of 'he's no one of us so must be one of them' then I'd be interested to hear their reasons.

It was a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed about 30 pages back (struggling to keep up!) in a list of people who should apologise over this entire saga that some Rangers fans included Hutton, just wondering if any of them want to elaborate why? My understanding of his conduct was that he stood up to the other SPL 11 who wanted Rangers squeezed in to the First Division, something which Rangers fans were more or less in agreement with since their preferred option was to start again in Div 3. Maybe I'm wrong? I realise it was some of the real roasters in here who said it but if its not just a case of 'he's no one of us so must be one of them' then I'd be interested to hear their reasons.

Kyle or Alan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Title stripping has begun

@BBCchrismclaug: Charles Green on #Rangers website saying he won't join #SPL in current form. Says difficult to engage when title stripping still an issue.

"HE" won't join?

Hardly surprising. He'll be long gone before that particular possibility is an issue.

More posturing and playing to the gallery. Which will, of course, be lapped up.

The real question is, apart from the great unlikeables, who actually gives a f**k what you say Charles?

Just to add:- It would be good to hear a reasoned argument as to just why title-stripping should be taken off the agenda.

So take a look at the rules, show that you haven't broken them, and we all dance merrily into the sunset.

That shouldn't be too hard....should it?

Edited by Shades75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"HE" won't join?

Hardly surprising. He'll be long gone before that particular possibility is an issue.

More posturing and playing to the gallery. Which will, of course, be lapped up.

The real question is, apart from the great unlikeables, who actually gives a f**k what you say Charles?

Just to add:- It would be good to hear a reasoned argument as to just why title-stripping should be taken off the agenda.

So take a look at the rules, show that you haven't broken them, and we all dance merrily into the sunset.

That shouldn't be too hard....should it?

Well don't you think he's getting desperate to put this share issue ahead?

After all the tax inquiry at Zeus Capital major shareholder Richard Hughes and Charles Green.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well don't you think he's getting desperate to put this share issue ahead?

After all the tax inquiry at Zeus Capital major shareholder Richard Hughes and Charles Green.

I think he's just keeping his face in the paper, while manipulating the "Rangers" fans.

I can't see how it could be more obvious and blatant unless he went to a supporters club draped in an orange top......ooh wait.....he didn't did he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a Rangers fan, I want to buy shares in my club, CG is providing this opportunity

He has promised to provide a FSA approved prospectus, that will explain exactly where and when the money will be used, he has already detailed his exit strategy

I fully expect CG to clear 4 Million for his part in this

Without the FSA approved prospectus I will not buy shares

Explain with proof and no guess work how I am as you put it being manipulated?

In what dimension would I be able to prove that a man on the Internet is being manipulated by another man in the public eye that I don't, personally, know?

I forget that on the Internet you have to put "IMO" after every statement.

But, just to humour you. When I say that Chuckie is manipulating the Rangers fans I thoroughly believe that that is what he is trying, and in some circles succeeding, to do.

He has to curry your favour or you (the wider you) won't buy his shares. Call it spin, manipulation or bullshit, it's all the same.

This time last year the man couldn't have found Ibrox with a satnav. A few months later and you all hated him (Cos Bomber said so). Now he's the bees knees and the Rangers fans and MSM hang on his every word.

That's some trick, and it would be hard to dismiss his playing to the gallery as having no part in that.

Remember, most football fans are not as learned as your good self and they quite like following the herd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...