dave.j Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 1.5 million they paid for Wallace in 2011. He's got 2 n a half years left on his contract. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelegendthatis Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Craig (wealth off the radar) Whyte is still keeping us entertained. http://www.scotsman.com/news/scotland/top-stories/craig-whyte-in-housekeeper-poison-threat-claim-1-3153337 If a housekeeper can sus him out as a con merchant, why did the Rangers 'legends' not see through his lies? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/lee-wallace/mwverlaufgraph/spieler_36657.html http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/rangers-fc/kader/verein_124.html I see a pattern http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/ian-black/mwverlaufgraph/spieler_21708.html http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/david-templeton/mwverlaufgraph/spieler_54268.html 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Slightly off topic, how can these legal types justify this sort of thing. But today, in a decision running to 36 pages and over 16,000 words, the Inner House of the Court of Session has issued a decision which, from an initial look, seems to make the job of HMRC in the appeal that much easier. 16,000 words to say " Naw, that's pish" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelegendthatis Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Day 19, and Ally still to put pen to paper on his reduced salary 'negotiated' agreement. When Ally, when?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Transmarkt just made the list That's got to be a wind up, every players worth zero! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Day 19, and Ally still to put pen to paper on his reduced salary 'negotiated' agreement. When Ally, when?? What's the rush, he's a gers man, pure loves the club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 I know, according to Rangers fans he's a beast who storms up and down the flank, charging past guys who have just finished a 40 hr week(if they are lucky) well worth a few million. Hey, don't knock him, the other week I saw the opposition doubling up on him. A painter and decorator. Left them for dead. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kildog Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Are they dead again yet? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomogganners Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 (edited) That's got to be a wind up, every players worth zero! http://www.transfermarkt.com/en/partick-thistle-fc-/kader/verein_2760.html Partick http://www.transfermarkt.com/en/dundee-fc/kader/verein_511.html Dee's http://www.transfermarkt.com/en/celtic-fc/kader/verein_371.html Celtic Edited October 24, 2013 by Bloomogganners 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookies Love Me Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Nope .. Ayebrokes will be purchased and the stadium leased back to them ... i.e.rented. Could the "Landlord" maximise his profit by having a multiple renting system, i.e. could rangers find themselves ground sharing with another homeless lower division team in the future, or a rugby team, or a flock of sheep? Sheep would be brilliant. But, how you would get them out of their seats on to the pitch is another matter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottxs Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 And if they share with sheep just imagine all the lovely wool cardigans they could give sir Walter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Could the "Landlord" maximise his profit by having a multiple renting system, i.e. could rangers find themselves ground sharing with another homeless lower division team in the future, or a rugby team, or a flock of sheep? Sheep would be brilliant. But, how you would get them out of their seats on to the pitch is another matter. Now, I'm a simple soul, unused to the world of corporate finance. Saying that, I have what might be a relevant question - if rangers can't balance the books now, what chance would they have if they had to pay rent on the Inland Revenue Arena, or whatever it's going to be called post-sale? Whatever the cash injection they may get from selling up, they've proved that they can burn through tens of millions faster than they can get through board members. Wasn't the IPO supposed to fund their rise "back"( ) to the top flight, and supply the wherewithal to purchase a competitive side? It seems to me the family silver's already gone, and now the telly and microwave are off down to Cash Converters. Basically, could paying rent on the Big Hoose finish them off for good? Is that the Bottom Line? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Could the "Landlord" maximise his profit by having a multiple renting system, i.e. could rangers find themselves ground sharing with another homeless lower division team in the future, or a rugby team, or a flock of sheep? Sheep would be brilliant. But, how you would get them out of their seats on to the pitch is another matter. Rugby club. The Jags did it for a while. Gives the pitch a good workout. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookies Love Me Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Now, I'm a simple soul, unused to the world of corporate finance. Saying that, I have what might be a relevant question - if rangers can't balance the books now, what chance would they have if they had to pay rent on the Inland Revenue Arena, or whatever it's going to be called post-sale? Whatever the cash injection they may get from selling up, they've proved that they can burn through tens of millions faster than they can get through board members. Wasn't the IPO supposed to fund their rise "back"( ) to the top flight, and supply the wherewithal to purchase a competitive side? It seems to me the family silver's already gone, and now the telly and microwave are off down to Cash Converters. Basically, could paying rent on the Big Hoose finish them off for good? Is that the Bottom Line? That's a big no-no! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Craig (wealth off the radar) Whyte is still keeping us entertained. http://www.scotsman.com/news/scotland/top-stories/craig-whyte-in-housekeeper-poison-threat-claim-1-3153337 If a housekeeper can sus him out as a con merchant, why did the Rangers 'legends' not see through his lies? Well, according to Jack Irvine, at least one of them is "just thick". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 That's a big no-no! Always up for recycling gags from the good old days of the BRALT, me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookies Love Me Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 (edited) And if they share with sheep just imagine all the lovely wool cardigans they could give sir Walter. Well he is used to fleecing all the bears. Edit: bollox that would be a bearskin then wouldn't it? Edited October 24, 2013 by Bookies Love Me 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stag Nation Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Nope .. Ayebrokes will be purchased and the stadium leased back to them ... i.e.rented. The problem with the sale-and-leaseback idea is that no potential buyer will pay more than the market value. As has been pointed out many times on this thread, Ibrox is worth very little except as a football stadium. It changed hands in 2012 for a mere £5.5 million as part of a rag-bag of other assets. Any buyer would need to be confident that - in the event of Sevco going bust - he could either sell it and get his money back, or find an alternative tenant. So what's the most Sevco could get on sale-and-leaseback? £4 million on a good day? I suppose that would keep them going to the end of the season. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highlandmagyar Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 So, what we saying? Unless saviour, angelic, whiter than Whyte??? King bankrolls them, they are FOOKED!! No matter how you slice it up, they are FOOKED. Leaseback wouldn't get them enough to finance their return to the Champions League? Looking like they are FOOKED, or at best a middling diddy club!! Splendid!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.