Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!

[hellbhoy]

I saw this image and it immediately made me think of someone who posts regular nonsense on here. I see it when someone quotes him. Despite the fact that I have him on ignore, I cannot escape his shit contribution. I do hope I am not betraying some deep psychological disturbance.

Your mind looks like a very scary place .

[AberdeenBud]

 

This is just a thought and I'll throw it into the mix,

 

Me thinks the SFA have opted to help them raise funds by giving Lee Wallace Scotland caps to raise the players profile and value.I do think he is off come January,but the question is !,how much is he worth down the divisions to help Sevco stay afloat financially a little longer.

 

Their biggest chance to get finance is to sell off any player they have that any club wants,but they may have shot themselves in the foot with the extortionate amount of wages they are being paid.The clubs may agree a fee but the player may not want to go because of lesser wages.

 

I mean who the fuck can they actually sell that has value or talent another club may want ?.

Nonsense, IMO.

Selling Wallace would hardly touch the sides of the The Rangers massive overspending.

Somehow I don't think WGS is handing out Scotland caps in order to prolong the existence of the newco for a month.

[dave.j]

Nope .. Ayebrokes will be purchased and the stadium leased back to them ... i.e.rented.

Fantastic news.

You know, I've quite enjoyed the last couple of days on here, it's like pre 12th June 2012 BRALT.

[Henrik's tongue]

Wouldn't even get 500k for him.

But.... but.... but he's the best left back in Scotland!

[cyderspaceman]

Remember the “Big Tax Case”? That was known, more formally, as Murray Group Holdings & Orcs v Revenue & Customs [2012] UKFTT 692 (TC) (29 October 2012) and the decision

Hee hee. Cheap laffs.

[dave.j]

1.5 million they paid for Wallace in 2011. He's got 2 n a half years left on his contract.

[thelegendthatis]

Craig (wealth off the radar) Whyte is still keeping us entertained.

http://www.scotsman.com/news/scotland/top-stories/craig-whyte-in-housekeeper-poison-threat-claim-1-3153337

If a housekeeper can sus him out as a con merchant, why did the Rangers 'legends' not see through his lies?

[~~~]

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/lee-wallace/mwverlaufgraph/spieler_36657.html

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/rangers-fc/kader/verein_124.html

I see a pattern

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/ian-black/mwverlaufgraph/spieler_21708.html

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/david-templeton/mwverlaufgraph/spieler_54268.html

[cyderspaceman]

Slightly off topic, how can these legal types justify this sort of thing.

But today, in a decision running to 36 pages and over 16,000 words, the Inner House of the Court of Session has issued a decision which, from an initial look, seems to make the job of HMRC in the appeal that much easier.

16,000 words to say " Naw, that's pish"

[thelegendthatis]

Day 19, and Ally still to put pen to paper on his reduced salary 'negotiated' agreement.

When Ally, when??

[dave.j]

Transmarkt just made the list

That's got to be a wind up, every players worth zero!

[dave.j]

Day 19, and Ally still to put pen to paper on his reduced salary 'negotiated' agreement.

When Ally, when??

What's the rush, he's a gers man, pure loves the club.

[dave.j]

I know, according to Rangers fans he's a beast who storms up and down the flank, charging past guys who have just finished a 40 hr week(if they are lucky) well worth a few million.

Hey, don't knock him, the other week I saw the opposition doubling up on him. A painter and decorator. Left them for dead.

[kildog]

Are they dead again yet?

[Bloomogganners]

That's got to be a wind up, every players worth zero!

http://www.transfermarkt.com/en/partick-thistle-fc-/kader/verein_2760.html Partick

http://www.transfermarkt.com/en/dundee-fc/kader/verein_511.html Dee's

http://www.transfermarkt.com/en/celtic-fc/kader/verein_371.html Celtic

Edited October 24, 2013 by Bloomogganners

[Bookies Love Me]

Nope .. Ayebrokes will be purchased and the stadium leased back to them ... i.e.rented.

Could the "Landlord" maximise his profit by having a multiple renting system, i.e. could rangers find themselves ground sharing with another homeless lower division team in the future, or a rugby team, or a flock of sheep?

Sheep would be brilliant. But, how you would get them out of their seats on to the pitch is another matter.

[scottxs]

And if they share with sheep just imagine all the lovely wool cardigans they could give sir Walter.

[WhiteRoseKillie]

Could the "Landlord" maximise his profit by having a multiple renting system, i.e. could rangers find themselves ground sharing with another homeless lower division team in the future, or a rugby team, or a flock of sheep?

Sheep would be brilliant. But, how you would get them out of their seats on to the pitch is another matter.

Now, I'm a simple soul, unused to the world of corporate finance. Saying that, I have what might be a relevant question - if rangers can't balance the books now, what chance would they have if they had to pay rent on the Inland Revenue Arena, or whatever it's going to be called post-sale?

Whatever the cash injection they may get from selling up, they've proved that they can burn through tens of millions faster than they can get through board members. Wasn't the IPO supposed to fund their rise "back"( ) to the top flight, and supply the wherewithal to purchase a competitive side? It seems to me the family silver's already gone, and now the telly and microwave are off down to Cash Converters.

Basically, could paying rent on the Big Hoose finish them off for good? Is that the Bottom Line?

[cyderspaceman]

Could the "Landlord" maximise his profit by having a multiple renting system, i.e. could rangers find themselves ground sharing with another homeless lower division team in the future, or a rugby team, or a flock of sheep?

Sheep would be brilliant. But, how you would get them out of their seats on to the pitch is another matter.

Rugby club. The Jags did it for a while. Gives the pitch a good workout.

[Bookies Love Me]

Now, I'm a simple soul, unused to the world of corporate finance. Saying that, I have what might be a relevant question - if rangers can't balance the books now, what chance would they have if they had to pay rent on the Inland Revenue Arena, or whatever it's going to be called post-sale?

Whatever the cash injection they may get from selling up, they've proved that they can burn through tens of millions faster than they can get through board members. Wasn't the IPO supposed to fund their rise "back"( ) to the top flight, and supply the wherewithal to purchase a competitive side? It seems to me the family silver's already gone, and now the telly and microwave are off down to Cash Converters.

Basically, could paying rent on the Big Hoose finish them off for good? Is that the Bottom Line?

That's a big no-no!