The-Ibrox-Preacher Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 THEY'RE GOING TO GET AWAY WITH IT, AREN'T THEY? Creepy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WILLIEA Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 . Views on McCoist please: A cynical dog whistler; or just a bit of a daftie? Two short planks or pigsh*t? Take your pick! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 Show us the title deeds to the thread and we'll all piss off again LOL. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainkev Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 Do you think McCoist is a bit thick? The obvious answer is yes, given such outpourings, but I don't actually mean it facetiously. I've never imagined him to be a very clever man, but he's usually fairly articulate and quick witted enough to suggest he isn't stupid. The more I hear though, I really wonder. I used to think he merely pleaded ignorance, but increasingly, he looks genuinely ignorant and stuck with a mind which isn't inquisitive enough to change things. Views on McCoist please: A cynical dog whistler; or just a bit of a daftie? I always thought he must have some brains about him as he clearly figured out early on it would be very beneficial to latch onto Walter Smith and keep tight with him. However, the fact that he's bounced from being Craig Whyte's lapdog and mouthpiece to being Charles Green's and then Craig Mather's and so on suggests that he is a bit thick and lacks the common sense to question dodgy sounding things and just says whatever the person in charge tells him to say until they are exposed as a crook or a shyster. And at that point he moves and starts trotting out the party line of the next authority figure at Ibrox. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_B Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 I always thought he must have some brains about him as he clearly figured out early on it would be very beneficial to latch onto Walter Smith and keep tight with him. However, the fact that he's bounced from being Craig Whyte's lapdog and mouthpiece to being Charles Green's and then Craig Mather's and so on suggests that he is a bit thick and lacks the common sense to question dodgy sounding things and just says whatever the person in charge tells him to say until they are exposed as a crook or a shyster. And at that point he moves and starts trotting out the party line of the next authority figure at Ibrox. Is it not a bit more straightforward than that-keep saying what the boss wants you to say and you'll continue getting paid tens of thousands of pounds a month that you wouldn't possibly earn elsewhere for a job you're clearly not up to... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drooper Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 I've missed this thread 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fife Saint Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 MAYDAY 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 I always thought he must have some brains about him as he clearly figured out early on it would be very beneficial to latch onto Walter Smith and keep tight with him. However, the fact that he's bounced from being Craig Whyte's lapdog and mouthpiece to being Charles Green's and then Craig Mather's and so on suggests that he is a bit thick and lacks the common sense to question dodgy sounding things and just says whatever the person in charge tells him to say until they are exposed as a crook or a shyster. And at that point he moves and starts trotting out the party line of the next authority figure at Ibrox. I think you'll find that McCoist has pocketed one of the highest paydays in this sorrid affair, what with wages and shares etc, he's also outlasted anyone else with his nose in the trough. He's smarter than the average bear. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidkennedyshand Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WILLIEA Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 One of the most delicious and ironic aspects of this is that the best hope ra berzz have of having a team is to stick with the spivs. The spipz are there to make money and will do their utmost to have some sort of team playing in Govan for as long as possible. Once the spivs go it's hello hello to games against Benburb and St Anthonys. Come on Cotter!!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 post-37086-0-18200300-1385579131.jpeg In all fairness, he probably is... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 I always thought he must have some brains about him as he clearly figured out early on it would be very beneficial to latch onto Walter Smith and keep tight with him. However, the fact that he's bounced from being Craig Whyte's lapdog and mouthpiece to being Charles Green's and then Craig Mather's and so on suggests that he is a bit thick and lacks the common sense to question dodgy sounding things and just says whatever the person in charge tells him to say until they are exposed as a crook or a shyster. And at that point he moves and starts trotting out the party line of the next authority figure at Ibrox.McCoist has trousered an absolute fortune from a club in dire financial straits whilst still making it seem to every Rangers fan that he's one of them with only the club's interest at heart. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thistle_do_nicely Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTG Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 Is there now a set penalty for a second admin? If not then any penalty should be shown to fit the behaviour that has driven this outcome (or apparent outcome). A club that wipes out its debt via liquidation, picks up where it left off in terms of vastly outspending its opponents, apparently raises £20m+ in a shares issue and STILL ends up shafting its creditors (and potentially its players) for the second time in 2 years. There shouldn't even be an argument about this - it's inexcusable that a club with the resources available to them from their supporter base can contemplate administration so quickly after liquidation of its predecessor. They should be hunted out the league and they can apply to join the Lowland League when they meet the criteria for an entry level licence (including 4 years audited accounts). If they are cleared to earn a second successive promotion on the back of losing over a million pounds a month since formation having shat all over their creditors once already then the administrators who oversee such a scenario should be hunted. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 Do you think McCoist is a bit thick? The obvious answer is yes, given such outpourings, but I don't actually mean it facetiously. I've never imagined him to be a very clever man, but he's usually fairly articulate and quick witted enough to suggest he isn't stupid. The more I hear though, I really wonder. I used to think he merely pleaded ignorance, but increasingly, he looks genuinely ignorant and stuck with a mind which isn't inquisitive enough to change things. Views on McCoist please: A cynical dog whistler; or just a bit of a daftie? Alpha fud. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.