Bing (2) Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 is that a request? More a Petrofac type thing Petrofac. There, said it again Great word/competition. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 Absolute pish and unsubstantiated lies and the content you posted just shows that you have read just about every post counteracting your perpetuated lie it's the very same club. Firstly No8 and I'll put it in bold capital letters if you disregard this post is that "OUR ASSOCIATIONS HAVE PAID TOP JUDGES & LAWYERS TO SIT ON ASSOCIATION PANELS TO RULE ONLY ON ASSOCIATION RULES & REGULATIONS". AT NO TIME HAS THIS SAME CLUB SHITE EVER WENT TO A REAL COURT OF LAW TO LEGALLY SHOW IT IS THE SAME CLUB. It's a cloned club you follow ya weak willed ST grabbing throbber. HBQC has spoken.... Pointing out your use of Big Lie tactics is just slightly different from using child abuse to deflect said point. That you cannot or simply refuse to see the difference speaks volumes. Thanks for providing further evidence (if such were needed) that you are indeed scum. I merely pointed out to you that celtic fans wouldn't like you going on about what they call the 'big lie'.... Nothing more, nothing less young sir. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 Pure unadulterated scum. I agree. Any person or organisation who covers up Beasts to protect their good name is indeed Pure unadulterated scum. Likewise anybody who defends these people or organisations is pure unadulterated scum. Thank God there are people like Fergus McCann who are willing to out these people 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 accepted, but in 10 years tim, these technicalities will be forgotten. Lol a pretty funny typo which tells it like it is... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 Pure unadulterated scum. I agree. Any person or organisation who covers up Beasts to protect their good name is indeed Pure unadulterated scum. Likewise anybody who defends these people or organisations is pure unadulterated scum. Thank God there are people like Fergus McCann who are willing to out these people 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 did someone bring rangers to the attention of a watchdog over alleged false advertising about a year ago over claims the club made over being the same one pre administration? i understand the accusation on the club was or not was the same hung on that, maybe there is nothing else that can prove rangers are not the same club as pre admin. so ...how did that go? Ask Stoney lol While anybody is checking that out could they also find out how Hibs got on with their appeal against last weeks Red card 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bing (2) Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 I agree. Any person or organisation who covers up Beasts to protect their good name is indeed Pure unadulterated scum. Likewise anybody who defends these people or organisations is pure unadulterated scum. Thank God there are people like Fergus McCann who are willing to out these people coff.................Mr Paisley..........coff..................... So you condemn the orginisations he is linked to? My, that is a change in stance from you 8. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bing (2) Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 ROLF Very good. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bing (2) Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 not Rolf H. I meant ROFL, Rolling on the Floor Laughing Worked better the first way, what with the shoite about. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 did someone bring rangers to the attention of a watchdog over alleged false advertising about a year ago over claims the club made over being the same one pre administration? i understand the accusation on the club was or not was the same hung on that, maybe there is nothing else that can prove rangers are not the same club as pre admin. so ...how did that go? Before the ASA outcome the club was peddling that "it was the most successful club team in the world" now the club only peddles that "it is the most successful club team in Scotland". Would you care to elaborate why the club no longer advertises that it is the most successful club team in the world any more ? Would that all boil down to that the legality of the club advertising "it is the most successful club team in the world" would then have the club breach UEFA ruling section 12 article "B" where UEFA explain to them that clubs are footballing companies ? So the cloned Rangers FC can now only advertise they are Scotland's most successful club only because the SFA & SPL to them can claim that a club in common speech is only who the SFA now believe to them what constitutes to be a club and whom they issue dead clubs SFA member licences too ? So given there are two completely different claims both used by a Rangers FC you would have to wonder why the club no longer peddles that it is the most successful club team in the world wouldn't you ? Two different adverts but the Newco Rangers cannot legally advertise that it is the world's most successful club !, it would appear under European law the club cannot make this absurd ridiculous claim because the club died and a cloned version was put in place. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 this stuff interests me, how easy it is for a group of people from all back grounds and various intelligences can still be manipulated regardless by people who have influence and power over them to do their bidding, from buying the latest gadget, wars to protect a country's territory to ethnic cleansing and genocide. It has happened repeatedly through out history and is continuing to happen right now in various forms through out the world either in consumerism or fundamentalism, you might not even realise its happening to you through your football club and the celtic way, consumerism obviously. Most football fans are no different in being influenced or manipulated by their football club its just one form and you are no different. The Crayola advert speaks. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 this was charles green's bluster and i'm sure you have worked out he is no long at the club to make such claims. however i have seen nothing that prevents rangers from claiming this, can you provide evidence that they cannot legally claim and could you also post the article from european law to back your claim up, it might put an argument to bed. Are you fucking serious ? Just google what I have in my signature you crayon munching mental patient !. UEFA article 12 section "B". All other countries except Scotland define the club as a footballing company. I could also show you SFA & SPL association rules from 2011 that never ever mention anything about any fucking club having a company to run it's affairs if you want, also clearly shows the extent of the lying and corruption the associations went to to con us all that somehow as if by magic they can separate the club from itself ffs by blaming the clubs company status for all it's financial woes. The argument will never go to bed as long as there are stupid fucking Rangers fans willing to live the lie just because it allows them to boast n brag about how much more successful they were over everyone else. Just ask No8 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 ladies and gentlemen i present the representative answer from the massive celtic support spokes person. well done sir on that intelligent witty and thoughtful reply. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Malloy Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 Rangers FC.......Club 12.....Sevco 2058(?).......Sevco Scotland.....The Rangers FC. the ever changing monikers of that "same club" myth. just out of curiosity......What was team 12's shirt colours? Where did they play their home games? Same club my arse. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 (edited) read the eufa rules you pointed out and i see nothing to stop any claims since it doesn't mention a club can't claim any success plus how you interpret it is down to your personal opinion which is obviously so biased to lack any form of impartiality. now again can you show me what european law this falls under, i assume this is a trading law so cut out the abuse, since i'm not abusing or insulting you in any form and show me some evidence that backs up your claim. i will have no problem with it if you can produce, all i'm after is the proof. Your posts themselves are asking for abuse at the level of intelligence you are showing. You didn't bother to read UEFA article 12 properly did ya ? OOPS Edited August 12, 2014 by hellbhoy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 still no answer and after 5793 pages and over 173,000 posts in the thread it should be so easy for you and the qc. and still the insults, its all you have left. btw i've no intention of leaving Fcuk me you are getting as tedious as Tedi at this aren't you ? 5794 pages and you still don't get it ? the current Rangers FC at Ibrox is a NEW CLUB. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kildog Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 accepted, but in 10 years tim, these technicalities will be forgotten. No they fucking won't. My obsession knows know bounds 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 My kids already know the truth ... and no doubt their kids and no doubt Snafu's grandchildren ... It will never fade in Scotland. They will always be a laughing stock. There is something quite disturbing about this post. I want to go and have a shower now that I've read it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 coff.................Mr Paisley..........coff..................... So you condemn the orginisations he is linked to? My, that is a change in stance from you 8. Absolutely. Any organisation that covers up and continues to cover child sex abuse should be outed and condemned by all 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kildog Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 There is something quite disturbing about this post. I want to go and have a shower now that I've read it. Rangers cheated. Then they died. Tell your weans! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.