Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

That really is a joke of a piece. Its headline is informed by the verdict of the very thickest observer of the entire episode - Derek Johnstone. It's truly incredible that the views of such an imbecile are afforded any kind of platform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do the Weegie chip-wrapper rags insist on referring to SevcoRangers2012 as "Glasgow giants" ? Most weird.

If they were being honest, they should be mentioning them in terms such as " Scotland's newest professional club is already on the brink of administration / liquidation after less than 3 years of existence due to financial mismanagement / dodginess."

Isn't going to happen though, is it ? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Herald and Evening Times have been Orc papers since back in the days they were owned by George Outram & Co, where you'd next to no chance of a job unless you could fake a good masonic handshake. Even after Newsquest took them over & a lot of the dinosaurs forced into early retirement, the old "attitudes" died hard - the place was like North Korea on a "Dear Leader"'s death on Valentine's Day 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do the Weegie chip-wrapper rags insist on referring to SevcoRangers2012 as "Glasgow giants" ? Most weird.

If they were being honest, they should be mentioning them in terms such as " Scotland's newest professional club is already on the brink of administration / liquidation after less than 3 years of existence due to financial mismanagement / dodginess."

Isn't going to happen though, is it ? :)

What can you expect? Rangers have 10 times as many "legends" as they ever had players playing for them. Mind you, I reckon my cousin is the only one who played for them that they don't count as a legend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What can you expect? Rangers have 10 times as many "legends" as they ever had players playing for them. Mind you, I reckon my cousin is the only one who played for them that they don't count as a legend.

You're related to Tero Penttila? Cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MT is quite correct. The story suggests that SARS, or a "rogue unit" has acted illegally and that the decision (to fine him) could be reversed.

Equally, it could also mean that the evidence and sentence would have to be revisited.

Could be read either way.

Clearly we'd prefer the latter :)

the herald also covered the story stating that king was top of the list as far as the South African authorities are concerned.

Surely rangers must realise its a recipe for disaster to get king involved in their club

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What can you expect? Rangers have 10 times as many "legends" as they ever had players playing for them. Mind you, I reckon my cousin is the only one who played for them that they don't count as a legend.

Only because he was shite.

Hopefully you'll go off on one, Hec. All the signs are there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Herald and Evening Times have been Orc papers since back in the days they were owned by George Outram & Co, where you'd next to no chance of a job unless you could fake a good masonic handshake.

Only six days to go until a new year. Hopefully 2015 will be a new start for the paranoid diddies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I notice the reporter - let's call them Mr X because I don't have my specs and can't see a byline - made a beeline for the nearest troughing b*****d with a Rangers connection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, the Scotsman article sounds like a bit of a nothing story at the moment. I'd like to see more detail about how this broad South African investigation could, in reality, impact directly on King. Right now, I'm not convinced that it really will.

That's how I read it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Sons of Struth have received information that in return for the naming rights deal Sports Direct now own the shirt sponsorship rights when the 32red deal expires, this deal has in practice cost Sports direct £1.

Sports Direct can do two things now, the can become our shirts sponsor for £1 or they can sell the rights to another sponsor and they they will receive the money

Our board have now handed away yet another income stream to mike Ashley for no financial advantage to our club

He now owns our shirt sponsorship for a quid, our shops, our merchandise, our carpark, our edmiston house which was paid for by fans via Rangers Pools, almost half the adverts at ibrox (no one knows how much if anything was paid for these0 and he attempted to own our badge and crest and we still have no answer from the board if this has actually happened

I dont think his shops run BOGOF offers but it appears he managed to get one when he bought his original shares, I wonder why and more on that as we clarify it.

Most fans would consider his involvement only occurred after admin, you are wrong, more on that to follow soon also........."smshz8.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...