stonedsailor Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 How long before we're singing "You're not Sevco anymore"? There's no way a club will rise from the ashes of this one. King needs desperately to pull something out of the bag. Ashley and the Easdales will have all the assets from their securities plus a wee bonus from their legal action. It would have been a perfectly executed plan if it was deliberate. They are not that switched on a bunch are they? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kildog Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Again the new board members passed DD, DD failed on reputational and / or historical issues with the profile and nature of the Company, none of this can be attributed to the new regime, just the old. Says who?!?!? You have to be trolling... please. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 (edited) Anyone else think Mike Ashley has no influence? The grinning fat fucker played the hand of his life. Edited April 2, 2015 by stonedsailor 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the 67 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Tedi tiny tears taking it bad..... Pleasing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 I thought when Ashley's men came onto the board they brought WH Ireland with them? ... they only had the one NOMAD. Tedi's lumping the other regimes in with them. I dont know. The point, though, is that even one is more than the current board can muster 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmy boo Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 When do they die? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnstoun Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 This is a 'favourable NOMAD settlement' if the intention is to hoover up as much of the club as possible for buttons. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Well, no to be honest. I cant comprehend how even the most bluest of noses could believe a word of it They have the right kind of faith 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BinoBalls Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 How many nomads did the previous toxic regime go through? Again the new board members passed DD, DD failed on reputational and / or historical issues with the profile and nature of the Company, none of this can be attributed to the new regime, just the old. Where are you getting this from? Who has actually said this? I know you're unbelievably stubborn by nature but I am even having trouble working out if you're on the wind up or being serious. The previous nomad was happy UNTIL it was clear Dave King walked in. Dave King is toxic. And a liar. In fact, he's toxic because he's a liar and a convicted fraudster. Seems pretty obvious to me that's he's the common denominator when it comes to nomad refusal. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P45 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 That is utterly pathetic. And shows that you care more about being right about King etc than you do about Rangers. Utterly pathetic and embarassing. Taken from RM and is pointed at Tedi and the like. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 The individuals credibility does not come into it, they have all been passed 'fit and proper', I have no doubt the previous regime were perfectly capable of hiding stuff (auditers resigning for instance) in order to gain the nomad, it did not take them long to discover what was going on so they had to be replaced time after time. They made this statement obviously unaware of quite how bad things were behind the scenes, the old regime were obviously hiding things....the auditor resignation for example. King lied to the shareholders to gain control. King lied openly. You are relying on his money. He lied he was branded a liar beforehand in a court of law. If King passes a fit and proper test from the SFA you will see a fan revolt bigger than 2012. Have no doubt. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 The individuals credibility does not come into it, they have all been passed 'fit and proper', I have no doubt the previous regime were perfectly capable of hiding stuff (auditers resigning for instance) in order to gain the nomad, it did not take them long to discover what was going on so they had to be replaced time after time. They made this statement obviously unaware of quite how bad things were behind the scenes, the old regime were obviously hiding things....the auditor resignation for example. Passed fit and proper only by a statement they made themselves , you really are a shit troll And the resignation that hasn't taken effect yet according to the same people who passed themselves fit and proper 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 I am merely repeating what is on the stock exchange announcement, just you continue wittering on about DK though. You know nothing, cannot think for yourself and believe everything you read if it has a Real Rangers Man name attached , is this the real reason The Rangers are fooked 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 The individuals credibility does not come into it, they have all been passed 'fit and proper', I have no doubt the previous regime were perfectly capable of hiding stuff (auditers resigning for instance) in order to gain the nomad, it did not take them long to discover what was going on so they had to be replaced time after time. They made this statement obviously unaware of quite how bad things were behind the scenes, the old regime were obviously hiding things....the auditor resignation for example. Oh, Tedi. How about an original though? One that comes from your own head and not that of King 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 How many nomads did the previous toxic regime go through? Again the new board members passed DD, DD failed on reputational and / or historical issues with the profile and nature of the Company, none of this can be attributed to the new regime, just the old. 3 Nomads, wasn't it? It's looking like the damage to the club maybe worse than anyone of us expected. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnstoun Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 I am merely repeating what is on the stock exchange announcement, just you continue wittering on about DK though. You realise the announcement was to the stock exchange from the club, and not vice versa, right? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted April 2, 2015 Author Share Posted April 2, 2015 Has Doink came in with a post of simply 'toxic shite' yet? Or has Tedi copyrighted that, followed naturally by 'previous regieme'? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 3 Nomads, wasn't it? It's looking like the damage to the club maybe worse than anyone of us expected. Keeping a good eye on the goings on as usual 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 3 Nomads, wasn't it? It's looking like the damage to the club maybe worse than anyone of us expected. You're right. But then most of us had worked that out when King took control 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 The individuals credibility does not come into it, they have all been passed 'fit and proper', I have no doubt the previous regime were perfectly capable of hiding stuff (auditers resigning for instance) in order to gain the nomad, it did not take them long to discover what was going on so they had to be replaced time after time. They made this statement obviously unaware of quite how bad things were behind the scenes, the old regime were obviously hiding things....the auditor resignation for example. Christ on a bike.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.