Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

It was the police who informed him. They have confirmed the arrests did happen.

Separate issue young sir, its about the breaking of procedures...

He shouldn't have had access to that report.

Mr McLaughlin had tweeted that details of sectarian singing and the use of a flare had been made in the delegate's report.

He tweeted: "Three fans from Rangers end arrested for sectarian singing during the win over Hibs. Also makes delegate's report as does use of flare."

He added: "Info reported was offered to me by match delegate after the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Separate issue young sir, its about the breaking of procedures...

Yes, I'm sure Rangers fans wouldn't want to see any procedures ignored or broken, given their strong record of condemning rule-breaking without fear or favour.

What terrible, non-straw-clutching outrage this is. I don't know what kind of "speaking to" this match official is going to get from the authorities, but by god I bet that once the speaking stops, he'll know that he's been spoken to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could it be that 100 Rangers fans were singing the Billy Boys sotto voce, and heard only by the nearby linesman? I don't think so.

Meanwhile, the Bears are probably asking what school Sotto Voce went to.

Ignorant, supercilious pomposity, even by my standards ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway, it's that time again. Police probe into Green's takeover has taken a very significant twist this week. Look out for the front page

K Jackson ^^

This could of course place Duff and Phelps back in the spotlight.

You must be grateful to Mark Daly for the work he's done in exposing the fact that they shouldn't have been in position at all, due to a clear conflict of interest.

Are you deliberately being a bit more of a tit than usual over the last couple of pages as a rhetorical exercise, a social experiment perhaps; or are you actually attempting to say things you believe to be relevant and true?

Edited by Monkey Tennis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

match official spoken to:

"well done lad, we can't let this pish pollute our game"

What? Is there anything there to suggest his speaking to wasn't to confer praise? Unless of course there's anyone backward enough to think sectarianism shouldn't be identified, reported and stamped out. Shirley not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rangers claim that they will win th case ( Daly smirks with a knowing smile) The show was slanted towards an agenda, you know this, I know this, everyone knows this. Of course you will continually say otherwise.

:lol:

This is paranoia of the like you so often claim is a characteristic of your arch enemies on the East end. It's almost like the pair of you are actually two cheeks of the same arse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This could of course place Duff and Phelps back in the spotlight.

You must be grateful to Mark Daly for the work he's done in exposing the fact that they shouldn't have been in position at all, due to a clear conflict of interest.

Are you deliberately being a bit more of a tit than usual over the last couple of pages as a rhetorical exercise, a social experiment perhaps; or are you actually attempting to say things you believe to be relevant and true?

It was the record who broke those stories.

My opinion differs from yours, deal with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah, all the evidence is on my side I'm afraid.

Everything that Daly says is qualified and he simply does not speak with the certainty you claim.

I've even found you some examples of what I mean:

He refers early on to "The tax man who claims he's owed a fortune"

He presses on similarly - HMRC claim that this scheme was tax evasion; Rangers just say they were exploiting a loophole".

That Baxendale bloke is given a platform to say "It's only a problem if HMRC win. If HMRC don't win..."

I really recommend Bennett that you watch the section between fifteen and twenty one minutes because the balance and equivocation come particularly thick and fast here.

A selection: "But was it legal? David Murray thinks so"

"The Murray group insisted they were playing by the rules"

Our evidence suggests they were not playing by the rules"

"So it seems that tax free trust payments were being regularly used as a substitute for salary"

"The case against Rangers is yet to be decided by tribunal. They could face a charge of £50m; they could be cleared"

"Evidence to be revealed for the first time tonight casts serious doubt on that (Murray's) claim"

"The case against Rangers is not just that they could have broken tax law..."

"Whether the tax case finds against the club is yet to be decided"

So plenty of things that are claimed or that seem to suggest something or cast doubt in areas or that could have been the case. Plenty of opportunity also for a Rangers friendly perspective to be offered and lots of reminders that a verdict is awaited and different ones are possible.

Obviously, you'll wish to mock me for actually watching the thing and providing quotes from it, but that's fine - I'm comfortable with my obsession.

Even you however, must surely recognise that your earlier claims about the programme in this thread, were simply examples of received nonsense that bear no scrutiny at all.

Stop baiting them, man!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listening to the BT Sport interview, does Warburton understand what he's let himself in for? He's talking about 'the club' but does he understand what's happening at the company level?

Never mind about Warburton, how do you feel about Dundee Utd being Celtic's feeder club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye, you're probably right there. Too much of an obsession about Rangers too realise that Thompson's ripping the pish out of them.

How're you doing anyway, Youngsy? How was your hiatus? What's your take on us this season?

After 3 competitive matches we're averaging 4 goals. The downside is we're conceding a goal a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How're you doing anyway, Youngsy? How was your hiatus? What's your take on us this season?

After 3 competitive matches we're averaging 4 goals. The downside is we're conceding a goal a game.

Warburton has us playing good football, it's great to watch, i was at the game on Sunday v Peterhead and tbh you can see that every player has bought into his ethos of working at the game during the week to bring results during the game. We'll score far more than we'll concede but his priority has to be a tightening up at the back. I'm not too sure about the keeper but it may well be he needs a bit of time to settle. One thing's for sure though, Warburton will takes us back to the top of the Scottish game. (We now await the usual about us never having been at the top, get's a bit boring and predictable from them all, i have to say).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll score far more than we'll concede but his priority has to be a tightening up at the back.

I think this is Sir Davie's job.

I may be a dinosaur and I've banged on about this over the years but Rangers always need a 'blood and snotters' centre half. Kiernan looks like he's a decent player but he needs someone along side him to give some backbone and I don't think McGregor is that man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...