Kyle Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 Rangers want Div 3 say their fans - clearly Green and Co have no intention of playing in Div 3 and will do ANYTHING to avoid it. Every club in Scotland has listened to their fans bar 1 (2 if we include Killie) if this is the case ! And also the 5 from the SFL. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quentin Taranbino Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 1 from division one 3 from division two 1 from division 3. If true, glad Forfar and Montrose also said no. Struggling to comprehend why any team said yes though, especially with the weight of feeling/views from so many other clubs saying no. Its only from a journo on twitter so could well be pish 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 I'm sorry I disagree - I'm pretty sure that 3 at least were from my Div and the talk at Bayview on Wednesday was there's no way we'll travel to give the spineless surrender monkeys gate money Then in my opinion you are as low and spiteful as any former Rangers fan I have met or read posts from. This was about justice not revenge, you are the type of supporter which Archie MacPhearson described on TV last night. Rangers were the only villains in this situation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtie23 Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 f**k off Brechin City 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swello Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 Somebody turn out the lights when they leave................no idea of social implications,no idea of economic implications,no idea of whats just occurred today. Lots of back slapping and well dones to each other in amongst the usual low rent diatribe and social bile. "We have the power...." no you don`t. Watch this space as the dominos start to tumble....... Finance from the SKY deal first followed by the trickle of other meaningful investment that all the champions of sporting integrity rely on every year to balance the books. Please don`t run out the old argument about "we had football before we had SKY/television rights and we can have it again" The fact is that the clubs then weren`t run on such a reckless manner and the overheads relative to income were always managed responsibly. Clubs now frequently live beyond their means, Rangers/Sevco/Orcs or whatever witless title that they have today are case in point. The Scottish game at grass roots will be the first to suffer from the number of clubs that wind down their already fragile youth policies because of reductions in revenue. It`s the first place that cuts get made when times get hard. We are now officially on the road to becoming a footballing backwater.Well done everybody,let the self congratulation begin............ On the plus side with the number of "never going back" posters on here I`m sure the local high streets will all be looking forward to receiving your hard earned cash at the end of every week.... kerrrching!!!!!!!! Sorry - you got the wrong place. - It's www.dailyrecord.co.uk/hotline for that type of stream of consciousness drivel. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRubberFist Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 Rumoured 5 to be: Brechin Stennie Shire QOS Hamilton Disgusted if true. I'll be off to Galabank next season (but not to see Sevco, obviously.) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itwiznaeme Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 The day Celtic play Real Madrd in the USA ,,newco are away to Peterhead. :lol: :lol: That should please them! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 The day Celtic play Real Madrd in the USA ,,newco are away to Peterhead. :lol: :lol: I am assuming your laughing at Real Madrid having to play a diddy team in a friendly!!! And not about Peterhead having to play a diddy team in the League 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tryfield Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
castilla Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 That's a 2yr gap, which is only 1yr more than waiting for them to get 3 back-to-back promotion, and no more than if reconstruction went ahead and reduced the number of tiers to 3. Why would that be a desirable option given need to indemnify SFL and still pay Settlement? EDIT: Unless the suggestion is Rangers would be parachuted directly into SPL1 which is getting us into even grubbier circles of corrupted-ness. Don't put it past them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 Third division forum for this pish. I think I'm the 1,000,000th person to say that! Do I get a prize? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FergieRCFC Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 Soo many cracking posts. Ran out of greenies unfortunately ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rusty 218 Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 just like to say that I'm very proud of Pie and Bovril, and all the diddy fans. Without us, I am convined 'Rangers' would be in the SPL and the travesty would have continued. This isnt the end - but they have the measure of who we are - and we will prevail! Now get behind your clubs - and prove that they were right to back us - come what may! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 Rangers want Div 3 say their fans - clearly Green and Co have no intention of playing in Div 3 and will do ANYTHING to avoid it. Every club in Scotland has listened to their fans bar 1 (2 if we include Killie) if this is the case ! You'd have to include the 5 SFL Quisling in that... only Dumbarton and Brechin can claim to have directly acted on the basis of fan polls of some kind (votes at meetings), but in both cases it was small number and somewhat disputed in terms of how it was presented. Also, for all we know, Johnstone actually abstained in opposition to the attempted stick-up over "the SFL1 compromise" and/or SPL2. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymores Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 and they sing # "Brechin no more, Stennie no more, wankers no more" -4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 The day Celtic play Real Madrd in the USA ,,newco are away to Peterhead. One of the rare occassions in which Rangers will be doing the right thing, while you're mob are sticking the middle finger up to Scottish football. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScarf Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 I'm still wating on evidence that ICT are going to go bust within 5 years without Rangers. © Fat Rangers fans in Inverness. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 What odds will I get for Sevco Scotland Ltd missing out on promotion because of a 10 point deduction handed to them as a result of Still The People's sectarian singing? That would be pleasing. Really pleasing. More chance of them going into administration they have about 3 players and massive overheads 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted July 13, 2012 Author Share Posted July 13, 2012 Has Ian Black signed for them yet? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymores Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 You'd have to include the 5 SFL Quisling in that... only Dumbarton and Brechin can claim to have directly acted on the basis of fan polls of some kind (votes at meetings), but in both cases it was small number and somewhat disputed in terms of how it was presented. Also, for all we know, Johnstone actually abstained in opposition to the attempted stick-up over "the SFL1 compromise" and/or SPL2. It was not allowed to abstain - in the SFL rulebook 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.