accietilleyedye Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 Nominated not yet appointed then? Dave has 3 Mike has 2...do the maths. 3 have how much money available , 2 are there to control,what can be assumed to the full £10 million owed and look after the contracts that you tell us Dave is taking time out on Monday to look at Man Math it is never as simple as adding up numbers, no matter what you wish for 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiddy Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 Doesn/t he own the car park, therefore access to the club deck? Along with Davy Cooper Park, Edmiston House, Rangers Merchandise & a hefty slice of advertising revenue. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 yeah, but he IS a glib and shameless liar etc And he is not a lawyer so him reading them would be like asking Tedi to explain them but he told Tedi he is looking at them Monday, we have to take him at his word 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P45 Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 If Ashley has no power why is King inviting him to work with the new board? Why does DK not just tell MA to hand back his stuff and gtf? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 Dunno, ask them. Boards vote, Mikes guys will just be outvoted, they are in control of nothing. Again you have the inside track, you know how the votes going down before an issue has even been tabled , you know with your help I believe The Rangers can make it this time 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 Do Sports Direct still have the ability to appoint two board members? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doink Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 Ian Durrant 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 Tell us then, what part are they about to breach. Removing their control over the money lent to Rangers by Sports Direct, because according to you they have no control , I am sure that will be part of the conditions of the loan that they get to oversee where the money gets spent. Wouldn't want it finding it's way into SARS sorry some spivs pocket. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P45 Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 Do Rangers fans just expect Ashley to gie in and f**k off? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killingfloorman Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 £7,500 worth according to the SFA , seems cheap at that price you could buy the clumpany 7,500 times over for that amount so i woul dsay that's a huge amount of influence. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 That's what I was wondering, if they are removed then wouldn't that breach whatever agreement they had when the loan was made? Or will King have to allow another two to take their place? I imagine its a case of either "appoint who we want or we take back the £10m". The fact Dave King himself admits he hasn't bothered to check out what the loan entails is the interesting part. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacGafraidh Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 Two takes from today that I found amusing and a question that I am pondering... 1) the old board were slammed for housing AGM people in the "away end" but King wasn't, Bears I fear for you as I doubt he is the messiah you are looking for! 2) If the club goes into admin to resolve (or absolve) it's debt, would they be an old club or new club in that event? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 You are sure Do you think Sports Direct give out money without having control on where it goes, does your inside track sorry salad tell you they hand it over with no conditions on how it is used and who makes those decisions on how it gets used 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 you could buy the clumpany 7,500 times over for that amount so i woul dsay that's a huge amount of influence. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trackdaybob Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 why is he not asking for his loan back then, his guys have just been booted out of the front door. ^^^ Thinks he's cleverer than Ashley ^^^ but is missing a question mark............. No point doing it too quickly. Much more enjoyable to bleed the club/company/whatever slowly. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 right,how much do the rangers owe ashley.in real money ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 You tell me.. Shouldn't you be telling us why Secvo fans are celebrating the "return" of a man who sat on the board of the old club during years of financial mismanagement, administration and liquidation? I really can't get my head around why some see this is a good thing. He did allow the old club to go to the wall despite his vast wealth after all -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invergowrie arab Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 Ask the old board, they obviously wanted them there, DK didn't nor did the Rangers fans which is why we booted them out today. It's we now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 Dave King chose to kick them out of the front door. Without ever reading the terms of the loan. At the moment of "kicking them out the door", he had literally no idea what the outcome of the that was going to be. He seems to be presuming its a case of "do what we want or we take our money back", and reckons they can cope without Ashleys millions, it could easily be a non-negotiable "we put whoever we want on the board, and the board can't reject them". We don't know, and Dave King doesn't know, only Ashley knows. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 The loan agreement said nominate...nothing about appoint. And you know it said nothing else , did your salad oops inside track tell you , is this the kind of hard fact that Standfree03 has been missing for you to answer his questions 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.