williemillersmoustache Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Are you Justin Zed or Justin Zee? Answer carefully now.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 I had not appreciated that the trial concerns only how Green and co came up with the £5.5m. Is that what you're saying? Yes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Z Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Are you Justin Zed or Justin Zee? Answer carefully now.. Hahaha! Zee. And the Nissan sports cars are also Zees. I'm out of positive rep or you'd have absolutely gotten one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 (edited) I'm really new to this party, seeing as I'm from the States. So yes, while I saw a Hearts match first while on holiday and so that's "my club" now, it's not nearly as engrained in me as it might be for a lot of other supporters who've been going to see their club all their lives. So I guess my question is, are the Rangers fans actually this confident that there's "nothing to see here," or are they just taking the piss?Because as a lawyer, even one versed in American, not Scots, law, this looks like a hell of a lot more than just "buying a car with stolen money." Legal beagles are a dime a dozen on this thread. Have you taken silk? Edited January 5, 2016 by The_Kincardine 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Legal beagles are a dime a dozen on this thread. Have you taken silk? ^^^^^ taken drink. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Z Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 How in the world could I have taken silk if I'm not even qualified to practice Scots law? I just came right out and said that, if not in absolute terms, in pretty damn obvious ones. That said, I, like most of the rest of the literate universe, can read an indictment with 15 counts on it, several of which have to do f-all with acquiring liquid cash by illegal means. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Looks like its Bitter o'clock for The_Arsehole again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 How in the world could I have taken silk if I'm not even qualified to practice Scots law? That's a no then. f**k off back to drafting wills and wishing you could shag Ally McBeal. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Sir Phil pishing all over the racist 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Z Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 (edited) That's a no then. f**k off back to drafting wills and wishing you could shag Ally McBeal. Hahahaha, oh man. Well, if nothing else, you've answered my question--you are actually that confident (and there's a fine line between confidence and delusion) that there's nothing else to this entire legal affair. Either that, or you're so nervous about all this, that you've bitten your fingernails down to nubs and it's really sare, isn't it you big grumpmaster. Edited January 5, 2016 by Justin Z 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 (edited) How in the world could I have taken silk if I'm not even qualified to practice Scots law? I just came right out and said that, if not in absolute terms, in pretty damn obvious ones. That said, I, like most of the rest of the literate universe, can read an indictment with 15 counts on it, several of which have to do f-all with acquiring liquid cash by illegal means. I really like the look of 12 & 13. Zee is unacceptable btw and with bonhomie like the above, you're very much in the potential alias probation box. Grumpmaster f**k it, I feel the addition of a smug-jambo-yank-shyster can only improve things. Alias or not, welcome, speculate away..... Edited January 5, 2016 by williemillersmoustache 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 The ownership of Rangers isn't on trial here however Perry Mason one wants to get and however-much the P&D dolts would wish otherwise. How about a wager? The outcome of this fraud case will lead directly to a dispute about Rangers' ownership. Who is fool enough to say yes? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 The QC has a competitor..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 The ownership of Rangers isn't on trial here however Perry Mason one wants to get and however-much the P&D dolts would wish otherwise. How about a wager? The outcome of this fraud case will lead directly to a dispute about Rangers' ownership. Who is fool enough to say yes? The ownership of Rangers is already in dispute. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 The QC has a competitor..... The QC has taken silk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Yes. Is Justin Zee just pretending that it's a lot more complicated then? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Z Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 (edited) Is Justin Zee just pretending that it's a lot more complicated then? Well really I was speculating, saying that it looked like more than just a handwave, while openly admitting my lack of expertise in this area . . . but someone's feeling a little defensive tonight. Edited January 5, 2016 by Justin Z 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kildog Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Where's the deeds? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 The ownership of Rangers isn't on trial here however Perry Mason one wants to get and however-much the P&D dolts would wish otherwise. How about a wager? The outcome of this fraud case will lead directly to a dispute about Rangers' ownership. Who is fool enough to say yes? Nobody, offering bets on a football forum is fucking deranged. Take a valium. The point of this trial isn't about a fraudulent transaction but about fraudulent acquisition of funds. Id est, the difference between buying a stolen car and using stolen money to buy a car. That subtlety is what is taxing the brains of the pathetic morons in grey and green. Here you say it's not about the transaction. Here Ally McZeeel quotes: 13. CW, GW, DW, PC, CG & IA participated in a conspiracy to purchase the business and assets of the club depriving creditors of the rightful sums due to them and the material benefit going to themselves So assuming that list of indictments is correct*, you're talking pish, and just a bit raging about it. And because the journalist tweeting about it went to a different school and you were wrong. I bet you that's whats's happening here. A billion smackerooonis. *a link is always useful here JZ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 The diddies sooking the boaby of the wee Hertz paralegal Desperate to think this is a case about a stolen car. -5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.