H_B Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Rumour (on Wings) has it that the poll was commissioned by a Trade Union and that the result was better for Yes than the union wants to release. I'll stress that this is rumour & I have absolutely no confirmation that it is true. If it's on Wings it must have something in it... that's a very credible source.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 If it's on Wings it must have something in it... that's a very credible source.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 If it's on Wings it must have something in it... that's a very credible source.... Do you have evidence to suggest Wings Over Scotland is not a credible source of information? Be very specific. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Do you have evidence to suggest Wings Over Scotland is not a credible source of information? Be very specific. Funny how now you become a proof-nazi Still waiting on the ATOS figures..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Do you have evidence to suggest Wings Over Scotland is not a credible source of information? Oh, so now you are seeking proof? When are you going to provide some evidence to support the claim that ATOS have driven "hundreds of thousands of people to depression and suicide"? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HardyBamboo Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 OK, give me some proof then please, be very specific. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 OK, give me some proof then please, be very specific. Of what? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HardyBamboo Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 That wings isn't a credible source of information. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 lolwut? WoS is a Nationalist blog. Of course it's not a credible source of information. It's, as is the nature of a blog, delivered piles of utter crap. Here's one :- http://wingsoverscotland.com/night-bombing/ Here's two :- http://wingsoverscotland.com/weekend-sovereignty-for-dummies/ And then of course, one day before George Osborne's speech on the non-currency union, WoS breathlessly reported that Danny Alexander was denying all knowledge of it. Which proved to be... utter bollocks. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 ^^^not rattled, again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Oops EDIT 17.41: Danny Alexander's just been on the radio denying all knowledge of the story. Looks like Ladbrokes have people on the inside. We'll be watching even more closely from now on http://wingsoverscotland.com/a-second-weird-thing/ As i said, a very credible source. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 As i said, a very credible source. f**k knows what point you think you're making. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Do you have evidence to suggest Wings Over Scotland is not a credible source of information? Be very specific. I have proof that it is not a credible source of information. Its parsing of the "Tarff Advertiser" is particularly fucked up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 I have proof that it is not a credible source of information. Its parsing of the "Tarff Advertiser" is particularly fucked up. Again, in English please? Good to see the usual suspects at play. Mr Bairn with his own particular brand of "I'm not trolling, honest" trolling and HB with his clutching at straws. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Again, in English please? Good to see the usual suspects at play. Mr Bairn with his own particular brand of "I'm not trolling, honest" trolling and HB with his clutching at straws. Once again, an utter disaster for you. Your Supras-like demand for evidence has been provided, which given the humiliting ATOS disaster you are having to deperately hope won't keep being brought up, is very very awkward. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Once again, an utter disaster for you. Your Supras-like demand for evidence has been provided, which given the humiliting ATOS disaster you are having to deperately hope won't keep being brought up, is very very awkward. I'm desperately hoping nothing. I have no problem, again, with telling you and your chums that I'm not going to explain my ATOS comments a fifth time. To anyone with a modicum of common sense, my comments were utterly justified and I stand by them. You haven't provided evidence, merely a couple of links that I can't find fault with. But carry on using words like "desperately", "disaster" and "awkward". It's amusing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Wings Over Scotland is the work of a very strange and twisted individual. Some of its output is interesting and gives an alternative perspective on things, but it certainly can't be considered a credible source given the amount of absolute shite that comes out of it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 that I'm not going to explain my ATOS comments a fifth time. To anyone with a modicum of common sense, my comments were utterly justified I think you need to understand the difference between "comments" and "claims". You made a numerical claim about the number of people driven to depression and suicide by ATOS. You have failed utterly to justify it. Is it justified to say "The SNP have driven millions of people to depression and suicide" Yes or No? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Wings Over Scotland is the work of a very strange and twisted individual. I think that's one of the main problems with it. He's good at what he does (getting mugs to pay for his hobby) though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 I think you need to understand the difference between "comments" and "claims". You made a numerical claim about the number of people driven to depression and suicide by ATOS. You have failed utterly to justify it. Is it justified to say "The SNP have driven millions of people to depression and suicide" Yes or No? If I'd have said 431,324 people have been driven to suicide by ATOS, that right there is a numerical claim. The phrase I actually used, which I'm sure you're more than familiar with by now, is not a numerical claim. Strike two. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.