Dindeleux Posted August 26, 2014 Share Posted August 26, 2014 It works crooks use it all the time.especially if there drug running and the cops cant touch them all very smart. There are 3 different ways to write the word "there", all with different meanings. Keep this in mind please. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookies Love Me Posted August 26, 2014 Share Posted August 26, 2014 (edited) There are 3 different ways to write the word "there", all with different meanings. Keep this in mind please. heret ereht reeth heert rethe FFS I could go on for ages. (Don't know what any of them mean though ) Edited August 26, 2014 by Bookies Love Me 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoversMad Posted August 26, 2014 Share Posted August 26, 2014 There are 3 different ways to write the word "there", all with different meanings. Keep this in mind please. There is only one way to write the word "there".There is also one way to write the word "their" you can also abbreviate "they are" to "they're" but those words there, they're all different words with their own meanings. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardinal Richelieu Posted August 26, 2014 Share Posted August 26, 2014 And "there" is not pronounced the same as "their" or "they're". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skittles Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 (edited) Scottish Sovereign Declaration of Arbroath The Declaration made a number of rhetorical points: that Scotland had always been independent, indeed for longer than England; that Edward I of England had unjustly attacked Scotland and perpetrated atrocities; that Robert the Bruce had delivered the Scottish nation from this peril; and, most controversially, that the independence of Scotland was the prerogative of the Scottish people, rather than the King of Scots. In fact it stated that the nobility would choose someone else to be king if Bruce proved to be unfit in maintaining Scotland's independence. Some have interpreted this last point as an early expression of 'popular sovereignty' – that government is contractual and that kings can be chosen by the community rather than by God alone. A Claim of Right for Scotland was a document crafted by the Campaign for a Scottish Assembly in 1988, declaring the sovereignty of the Scottish people. It was signed by all then-serving Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs, with the exception of Tam Dalyell (Labour), a strident opponent of devolution. The list of signatories included several MPs who would later attain high office, including future prime minister Gordon Brown, future chancellor Alistair Darling, and future leaders of the Liberal Democrats Charlie Kennedy and Menzies Campbell. The Claim of Right reads- We, gathered as the Scottish Constitutional Convention, do hereby acknowledge the sovereign right of the Scottish people to determine the form of Government best suited to their needs, and do hereby declare and pledge that in all our actions and deliberations their interests shall be paramount. We further declare and pledge that our actions and deliberations shall be directed to the following ends: To agree a scheme for an Assembly or Parliament for Scotland; To mobilize Scottish opinion and ensure the approval of the Scottish people for that scheme; and To assert the right of the Scottish people to secure implementation of that scheme. The argument was based upon the terms of Article 18 of the Treaty of Union, the terms of which are familiar to historians, legal academics and commentators and to the courts which have considered its import on a number of occasions. The Article reads as follows: “That the Laws concerning Regulation of Trade, Customs and such Excises to which Scotland is by virtue of this Treaty to be lyable be the same in Scotland from and after the Union as in England, and that all other Lawes in use within the Kingdom of Scotland do after the Union and notwithstanding thereof remain the same as before (except such as are contrary to or inconsistent with this Treaty) but alterable by the Parliament of Great Britain With this difference betwixt the laws concerning publick Right, Policy and Civil Government and those which concern private Right That the Laws which concern publick Right Policy and Civil Government may be made the same throughout the whole United Kingdom but that no alteration be made in Laws which concern private Right except for the evident utility of the subjects within Scotland.” <---- In parliamentary systems of government, primary legislation and secondary legislation, also referred to as delegated legislation, are two forms of law, created respectively by the legislative and executive branches of government. The executive branch is commonly known as His/her Majesty's Government (HMG). It is led by the Prime Minister and the Cabinet and is made up of a collection of about a hundred ministers who carry out the laws made by Parliament and who run the government and the country day-to-day. The judicial branch enforces the law. Primary legislation is law made by the legislative branch of government. This contrasts with secondary legislation, which is usually made by the executive branch. Secondary (or delegated) legislation must be authorized by primary legislation, and conform to boundaries it has laid down. Secondary legislation (also referred to as delegated legislation) is law made by an executive authority under powers delegated from by an enactment of primary legislation, which grants the executive agency power to implement and administer the requirements of that primary legislation. The power to pass delegated legislation is defined and limited by the primary legislation that delated those powers; if the subordinate authority acts beyond its remit, its acts will be invalid or ultra vires. <---- Forms of secondary legislation in the United Kingdom include: Statutory instruments – made in a variety of forms, most commonly Orders in Council, regulations, rules and orders. The form to be adopted is usually set out in the enabling Act. US Senate Resolution 155 of 10 November 1997 states that the Declaration of Arbroath, the Scottish Declaration of Independence, was signed on April 6, 1320 and the American Declaration of Independence was modeled on that inspirational document. RESOLUTION Designating April 6 of each year as ``National Tartan Day to recognize the outstanding achievements and contributions made by Scottish Americans to the United States. Whereas April 6 has a special significance for all Americans, and especially those Americans of Scottish descent, because the Declaration of Arbroath, the Scottish Declaration of Independence, was signed on April 6, 1320 and the American Declaration of Independence was modeled on that inspirational document; Whereas this resolution honors the major role that Scottish Americans played in the founding of this Nation, such as the fact that almost half of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were of Scottish descent, the Governors in 9 of the original 13 States were of Scottish ancestry,Scottish Americans successfully helped shape this country in its formative years and guide this Nation through its most troubled times; Whereas this resolution recognizes the monumental achievements and invaluable contributions made by Scottish Americans that have led to America's preeminence in the fields of science, technology, medicine, government, politics, economics, architecture, literature, media, and visual and performing arts; Whereas this resolution commends the more than 200 organizations throughout the United States that honor Scottish heritage, tradition, and culture,representing the hundreds of thousands of Americans of Scottish descent, residing in every State, who already have made the observance of Tartan Day on April 6 a success; Whereas These numerous individuals, clans, societies, clubs, and fraternal organizations do not let the great contributions of the Scottish people go unnoticed: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the Senate designates April 6 of each year as ``National Tartan Day. Before someone starts shouting then how come none of the stuff has worked or been documented of a sovereign winning their cases. It's so simple you will feel stupid but hey you are not legally trained and i will not hold that against you. There is such a thing called LEGAL PRECEDENT. Cases usually get thrown out if it contradicts statutory law as it would create a legal precedent and the case itself is against you, the accused/defendant you are not there to win anything. Scots have always been free that is the point. You could say we invented the very notion of independence and individual sovereignty and the right to self determination. Ignorance of the law excuses no one. Doesn't matter that we have factual evidence that cannot be denied of why Scots are Sovereign, if enough people believe it to be a lie it becomes the truth by default. Edited July 28, 2016 by Skittles -3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gavin_3110 Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 Didn't read. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 Still not a clue what any of this stuff is all about. It's like these folk have skipped the part where they explain their beliefs and just jumped into the stage of poorly arguing why they're right. Someone went round the bus stops in Stirling a month or two back, putting up hand-written posters with one of those nonsensical 'legal name' slogans. They'd done that thing where people trim the bottom of the paper into a fringe with a phone number written on, so you can rip one strand off and take the number away with you. I'd imagine every caller started by asking what the poster was about, only to hang up when they realised they were never going to get an answer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardinal Richelieu Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 28 minutes ago, Skittles said: Scottish Sovereign Declaration of Arbroath The Declaration made a number of rhetorical points: that Scotland had always been independent, indeed for longer than England; that Edward I of England had unjustly attacked Scotland and perpetrated atrocities; that Robert the Bruce had delivered the Scottish nation from this peril; and, most controversially, that the independence of Scotland was the prerogative of the Scottish people, rather than the King of Scots. In fact it stated that the nobility would choose someone else to be king if Bruce proved to be unfit in maintaining Scotland's independence. Some have interpreted this last point as an early expression of 'popular sovereignty' – that government is contractual and that kings can be chosen by the community rather than by God alone. A Claim of Right for Scotland was a document crafted by the Campaign for a Scottish Assembly in 1988, declaring the sovereignty of the Scottish people. It was signed by all then-serving Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs, with the exception of Tam Dalyell (Labour), a strident opponent of devolution. The list of signatories included several MPs who would later attain high office, including future prime minister Gordon Brown, future chancellor Alistair Darling, and future leaders of the Liberal Democrats Charlie Kennedy and Menzies Campbell. The Claim of Right reads- We, gathered as the Scottish Constitutional Convention, do hereby acknowledge the sovereign right of the Scottish people to determine the form of Government best suited to their needs, and do hereby declare and pledge that in all our actions and deliberations their interests shall be paramount. We further declare and pledge that our actions and deliberations shall be directed to the following ends: To agree a scheme for an Assembly or Parliament for Scotland; To mobilize Scottish opinion and ensure the approval of the Scottish people for that scheme; and To assert the right of the Scottish people to secure implementation of that scheme. The argument was based upon the terms of Article 18 of the Treaty of Union, the terms of which are familiar to historians, legal academics and commentators and to the courts which have considered its import on a number of occasions. The Article reads as follows: “That the Laws concerning Regulation of Trade, Customs and such Excises to which Scotland is by virtue of this Treaty to be lyable be the same in Scotland from and after the Union as in England, and that all other Lawes in use within the Kingdom of Scotland do after the Union and notwithstanding thereof remain the same as before (except such as are contrary to or inconsistent with this Treaty) but alterable by the Parliament of Great Britain With this difference betwixt the laws concerning publick Right, Policy and Civil Government and those which concern private Right That the Laws which concern publick Right Policy and Civil Government may be made the same throughout the whole United Kingdom but that no alteration be made in Laws which concern private Right except for the evident utility of the subjects within Scotland.” <---- In parliamentary systems of government, primary legislation and secondary legislation, also referred to as delegated legislation, are two forms of law, created respectively by the legislative and executive branches of government. The executive branch is commonly known as His/her Majesty's Government (HMG). It is led by the Prime Minister and the Cabinet and is made up of a collection of about a hundred ministers who carry out the laws made by Parliament and who run the government and the country day-to-day. The judicial branch enforces the law. Primary legislation is law made by the legislative branch of government. This contrasts with secondary legislation, which is usually made by the executive branch. Secondary (or delegated) legislation must be authorized by primary legislation, and conform to boundaries it has laid down. Secondary legislation (also referred to as delegated legislation) is law made by an executive authority under powers delegated from by an enactment of primary legislation, which grants the executive agency power to implement and administer the requirements of that primary legislation. The power to pass delegated legislation is defined and limited by the primary legislation that delated those powers; if the subordinate authority acts beyond its remit, its acts will be invalid or ultra vires. <---- Forms of secondary legislation in the United Kingdom include: Statutory instruments – made in a variety of forms, most commonly Orders in Council, regulations, rules and orders. The form to be adopted is usually set out in the enabling Act. US Senate Resolution 155 of 10 November 1997 states that the Declaration of Arbroath, the Scottish Declaration of Independence, was signed on April 6, 1320 and the American Declaration of Independence was modeled on that inspirational document. RESOLUTION Designating April 6 of each year as ``National Tartan Day to recognize the outstanding achievements and contributions made by Scottish Americans to the United States. Whereas April 6 has a special significance for all Americans, and especially those Americans of Scottish descent, because the Declaration of Arbroath, the Scottish Declaration of Independence, was signed on April 6, 1320 and the American Declaration of Independence was modeled on that inspirational document; Whereas this resolution honors the major role that Scottish Americans played in the founding of this Nation, such as the fact that almost half of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were of Scottish descent, the Governors in 9 of the original 13 States were of Scottish ancestry,Scottish Americans successfully helped shape this country in its formative years and guide this Nation through its most troubled times; Whereas this resolution recognizes the monumental achievements and invaluable contributions made by Scottish Americans that have led to America's preeminence in the fields of science, technology, medicine, government, politics, economics, architecture, literature, media, and visual and performing arts; Whereas this resolution commends the more than 200 organizations throughout the United States that honor Scottish heritage, tradition, and culture,representing the hundreds of thousands of Americans of Scottish descent, residing in every State, who already have made the observance of Tartan Day on April 6 a success; Whereas These numerous individuals, clans, societies, clubs, and fraternal organizations do not let the great contributions of the Scottish people go unnoticed: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the Senate designates April 6 of each year as ``National Tartan Day. Before someone starts shouting then how come none of the stuff has worked or been documented of a sovereign winning their cases. It's so simple you will feel stupid but hey you are not legally trained and i will not hold that against you. There is such a thing called LEGAL PRECEDENT. Cases usually get thrown out if it contradicts statutory law as it would create a legal precedent and the case itself is against you, the accused/defendant you are not there to win anything. Scots have always been free that is the point. You could say we invented the very notion of independence and individual sovereignty and the right to self determination. Ignorance of the law excuses no one. Doesn't matter that we have factual evidence that cannot be denied of why Scots are Sovereign, if enough people believe it to be a lie it becomes the truth by default. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDcups Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 30 minutes ago, Skittles said: Scottish Sovereign Declaration of Arbroath The Declaration made a number of rhetorical points: that Scotland had always been independent, indeed for longer than England; that Edward I of England had unjustly attacked Scotland and perpetrated atrocities; that Robert the Bruce had delivered the Scottish nation from this peril; and, most controversially, that the independence of Scotland was the prerogative of the Scottish people, rather than the King of Scots. In fact it stated that the nobility would choose someone else to be king if Bruce proved to be unfit in maintaining Scotland's independence. Some have interpreted this last point as an early expression of 'popular sovereignty' – that government is contractual and that kings can be chosen by the community rather than by God alone. A Claim of Right for Scotland was a document crafted by the Campaign for a Scottish Assembly in 1988, declaring the sovereignty of the Scottish people. It was signed by all then-serving Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs, with the exception of Tam Dalyell (Labour), a strident opponent of devolution. The list of signatories included several MPs who would later attain high office, including future prime minister Gordon Brown, future chancellor Alistair Darling, and future leaders of the Liberal Democrats Charlie Kennedy and Menzies Campbell. The Claim of Right reads- We, gathered as the Scottish Constitutional Convention, do hereby acknowledge the sovereign right of the Scottish people to determine the form of Government best suited to their needs, and do hereby declare and pledge that in all our actions and deliberations their interests shall be paramount. We further declare and pledge that our actions and deliberations shall be directed to the following ends: To agree a scheme for an Assembly or Parliament for Scotland; To mobilize Scottish opinion and ensure the approval of the Scottish people for that scheme; and To assert the right of the Scottish people to secure implementation of that scheme. The argument was based upon the terms of Article 18 of the Treaty of Union, the terms of which are familiar to historians, legal academics and commentators and to the courts which have considered its import on a number of occasions. The Article reads as follows: “That the Laws concerning Regulation of Trade, Customs and such Excises to which Scotland is by virtue of this Treaty to be lyable be the same in Scotland from and after the Union as in England, and that all other Lawes in use within the Kingdom of Scotland do after the Union and notwithstanding thereof remain the same as before (except such as are contrary to or inconsistent with this Treaty) but alterable by the Parliament of Great Britain With this difference betwixt the laws concerning publick Right, Policy and Civil Government and those which concern private Right That the Laws which concern publick Right Policy and Civil Government may be made the same throughout the whole United Kingdom but that no alteration be made in Laws which concern private Right except for the evident utility of the subjects within Scotland.” <---- In parliamentary systems of government, primary legislation and secondary legislation, also referred to as delegated legislation, are two forms of law, created respectively by the legislative and executive branches of government. The executive branch is commonly known as His/her Majesty's Government (HMG). It is led by the Prime Minister and the Cabinet and is made up of a collection of about a hundred ministers who carry out the laws made by Parliament and who run the government and the country day-to-day. The judicial branch enforces the law. Primary legislation is law made by the legislative branch of government. This contrasts with secondary legislation, which is usually made by the executive branch. Secondary (or delegated) legislation must be authorized by primary legislation, and conform to boundaries it has laid down. Secondary legislation (also referred to as delegated legislation) is law made by an executive authority under powers delegated from by an enactment of primary legislation, which grants the executive agency power to implement and administer the requirements of that primary legislation. The power to pass delegated legislation is defined and limited by the primary legislation that delated those powers; if the subordinate authority acts beyond its remit, its acts will be invalid or ultra vires. <---- Forms of secondary legislation in the United Kingdom include: Statutory instruments – made in a variety of forms, most commonly Orders in Council, regulations, rules and orders. The form to be adopted is usually set out in the enabling Act. US Senate Resolution 155 of 10 November 1997 states that the Declaration of Arbroath, the Scottish Declaration of Independence, was signed on April 6, 1320 and the American Declaration of Independence was modeled on that inspirational document. RESOLUTION Designating April 6 of each year as ``National Tartan Day to recognize the outstanding achievements and contributions made by Scottish Americans to the United States. Whereas April 6 has a special significance for all Americans, and especially those Americans of Scottish descent, because the Declaration of Arbroath, the Scottish Declaration of Independence, was signed on April 6, 1320 and the American Declaration of Independence was modeled on that inspirational document; Whereas this resolution honors the major role that Scottish Americans played in the founding of this Nation, such as the fact that almost half of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were of Scottish descent, the Governors in 9 of the original 13 States were of Scottish ancestry,Scottish Americans successfully helped shape this country in its formative years and guide this Nation through its most troubled times; Whereas this resolution recognizes the monumental achievements and invaluable contributions made by Scottish Americans that have led to America's preeminence in the fields of science, technology, medicine, government, politics, economics, architecture, literature, media, and visual and performing arts; Whereas this resolution commends the more than 200 organizations throughout the United States that honor Scottish heritage, tradition, and culture,representing the hundreds of thousands of Americans of Scottish descent, residing in every State, who already have made the observance of Tartan Day on April 6 a success; Whereas These numerous individuals, clans, societies, clubs, and fraternal organizations do not let the great contributions of the Scottish people go unnoticed: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the Senate designates April 6 of each year as ``National Tartan Day. Before someone starts shouting then how come none of the stuff has worked or been documented of a sovereign winning their cases. It's so simple you will feel stupid but hey you are not legally trained and i will not hold that against you. There is such a thing called LEGAL PRECEDENT. Cases usually get thrown out if it contradicts statutory law as it would create a legal precedent and the case itself is against you, the accused/defendant you are not there to win anything. Scots have always been free that is the point. You could say we invented the very notion of independence and individual sovereignty and the right to self determination. Ignorance of the law excuses no one. Doesn't matter that we have factual evidence that cannot be denied of why Scots are Sovereign, if enough people believe it to be a lie it becomes the truth by default. YAY a worse poster than me. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skittles Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 (edited) The ultimate ignorance is the rejection of something you know nothing about yet refuse to investigate. Dr. Wayne Dyer You have not got a clue? I got you the best answer to point you in the right direction. Everything i posted is FACTS even a quick google check will prove that. Do you own investigation I'm not telling you to take my word. Evidence is right there and you still refute it lmao i wonder who fucking eejit is then. instantly dismissed lol couple of fannies who think they know it all without investigating. Edited July 28, 2016 by Skittles 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 1 minute ago, Skittles said: The ultimate ignorance is the rejection of something you know nothing about yet refuse to investigate. Dr. Wayne Dyer You have not got a clue? I get you the best answer to point you in the right direction. Everything i posted is FACTS even a quick google check will prove that. Do you own investigation I'm not telling you to take my word. Evidence is right there and you still refute it lmao i wonder who fucking eejit is then This salad was brought to you by words. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 7 minutes ago, Skittles said: The ultimate ignorance is the rejection of something you know nothing about yet refuse to investigate. Dr. Wayne Dyer You have not got a clue? I got you the best answer to point you in the right direction. Everything i posted is FACTS even a quick google check will prove that. Do you own investigation I'm not telling you to take my word. Evidence is right there and you still refute it lmao i wonder who fucking eejit is then. instantly dismissed lol couple of fannies who think they know it all without investigating. Well that's me convinced. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gavin_3110 Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 7 minutes ago, Skittles said: The ultimate ignorance is the rejection of something you know nothing about yet refuse to investigate. Dr. Wayne Dyer You have not got a clue? I got you the best answer to point you in the right direction. Everything i posted is FACTS even a quick google check will prove that. Do you own investigation I'm not telling you to take my word. Evidence is right there and you still refute it lmao i wonder who fucking eejit is then. instantly dismissed lol couple of fannies who think they know it all without investigating. Wake up sheeple!!!!1!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 Still no explanation about what we're supposed to be investigating. Remarkable. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 False flag..!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skittles Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 What so you can't read? Declaration Abroath & A Claim of Right for Scotland Shows sovereignty lies with the individual. These's documents are recognised world wide and still hold true to this day. I explained where and how statutory tools are enacted through secondary legislation and how to prove they are invalid. All Government sourced. Article 18 of the Treaty of Union Is famously known to conflict with public vs private rights of the scottish people. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MEADOWXI Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 16 minutes ago, Skittles said: The ultimate ignorance is the rejection of something you know nothing about yet refuse to investigate. Dr. Wayne Dyer You have not got a clue? I got you the best answer to point you in the right direction. Everything i posted is FACTS even a quick google check will prove that. Do you own investigation I'm not telling you to take my word. Evidence is right there and you still refute it lmao i wonder who fucking eejit is then. instantly dismissed lol couple of fannies who think they know it all without investigating. Good luck with all that, Fucknugget of the family Skittles 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skittles Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 (edited) How can any of you c***s actually consider being scottish? wait no your mental attitude appears to resonate with those filthy remainers. f**k sake was i the only person brought up not to trust politicians never mind the government. You really need to wake up Edited July 28, 2016 by Skittles -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 2 minutes ago, Skittles said: How can any of you c***s actually consider being scottish? wait no your mental attitude appears to resonate with those filthy remainers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 How can any of you c***s actually consider being scottish? wait no your mental attitude appears to resonate with those filthy remainers. f**k sake was i the only person brought up not to trust politicians never mind the government. You really need to wake up Not sure what point you are making. Please provide another 3,000 word post to explain it properly and I promise not to bother reading it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.