forever_blue Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Disagree. Milliband and Murphy where inept... but Scotland was sick of labour and its inability to stick up for Scotland. Parts of Glasgow have the highest poverty in the western world. Thanks labour Can someone tell me measure are in place by the snp or even in a independent Scotland are in place to tackle the poverty in Glasgow etc , I have heard countless statements of how it is unacceptable but what ideas are going to be put in place to combat these conditions which have not already been tried . This is not a snide or offensive question I am genuinely interested in an answer and discussion on the matter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anonapersona Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Can someone tell me measure are in place by the snp or even in a independent Scotland are in place to tackle the poverty in Glasgow etc , I have heard countless statements of how it is unacceptable but what ideas are going to be put in place to combat these conditions which have not already been tried . This is not a snide or offensive question I am genuinely interested in an answer and discussion on the matter Until FFA and ultimately independence, there's always going to be a lot of speculation but nothing can be considered to be concrete. A lot of trust has been handed to the SNP and it is up to them to deliver, or become like Labor. Personally, I trust them to deliver. Many do not. Fine. I think it's safe to say that poverty in Glasgow is pretty low on the Tory totem pole. Always will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Can someone tell me measure are in place by the snp or even in a independent Scotland are in place to tackle the poverty in Glasgow etc , I have heard countless statements of how it is unacceptable but what ideas are going to be put in place to combat these conditions which have not already been tried . This is not a snide or offensive question I am genuinely interested in an answer and discussion on the matter The SNP plan to engineer a nuclear "accident" at faslane to erradicate west coast poverty and solidify the anti-nuclear lobby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 The SNP plan to engineer a nuclear "accident" at faslane to erradicate west coast poverty and solidify the anti-nuclear lobby. There's some places on the west coast where nuclear devastation would probably be regarded as urban redevelopment. Win-win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Rational Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 I'm confident that the SNP will not have it within the Holyrood manifesto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 I'm confident that the SNP will not have it within the Holyrood manifesto. I reckon that it could depend on the legislative programme that is brought forward for Westminister in the coming weeks. If proposals to withdraw from ECHR is a sign of things to come it could be the catalyst for another Referendum. Sturgeon could possibly word the Manifesto in a way that gives her a mandate without obliging her to follow through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabinoban Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Disagree. Milliband and Murphy where inept... but Scotland was sick of labour and its inability to stick up for Scotland. Parts of Glasgow have the highest poverty in the western world. Thanks labour Scotland may be sick of Labour but that doesn't mean a majority of the Scottish public want independence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddly optomistic Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 I reckon that it could depend on the legislative programme that is brought forward for Westminister in the coming weeks. If proposals to withdraw from ECHR is a sign of things to come it could be the catalyst for another Referendum.Sturgeon could possibly word the Manifesto in a way that gives her a mandate without obliging her to follow through.I thought he was talking about a nuclear accident ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Rational Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 I reckon that it could depend on the legislative programme that is brought forward for Westminister in the coming weeks. If proposals to withdraw from ECHR is a sign of things to come it could be the catalyst for another Referendum.Sturgeon could possibly word the Manifesto in a way that gives her a mandate without obliging her to follow through. It might not be us that brings it forward Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandarilla Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 I reckon that it could depend on the legislative programme that is brought forward for Westminister in the coming weeks. If proposals to withdraw from ECHR is a sign of things to come it could be the catalyst for another Referendum. Sturgeon could possibly word the Manifesto in a way that gives her a mandate without obliging her to follow through. I think this would be an error. It would look like a clear political trick - and she has so far managed to convince people that she is on a different level. She needs to be straight up with the Scottish people. We're good at sniffing out the bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 There's some places on the west coast where nuclear devastation would probably be regarded as urban redevelopment. Win-win. You could say the same about some parts of Dundee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TapothehullDee Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 No, no. It ends with a yes vote. Happy to help. You won't be alive in 2150 though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FuzzyAffro Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 I think this would be an error. It would look like a clear political trick - and she has so far managed to convince people that she is on a different level. She needs to be straight up with the Scottish people. We're good at sniffing out the bullshit. Tbf, given the no vote, I think we are clearly shite at sniffing out bullshit. I think that's undeniable, 55% of us anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandarilla Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Tbf, given the no vote, I think we are clearly shite at sniffing out bullshit. I think that's undeniable, 55% of us anyway. Fair point. I should've said snp supporters (those switched on politically) are good at sniffing out bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FuzzyAffro Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 That's true, and they are the majority of SNP voters anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elixir Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Could they not put a possible scenario in their manifesto which would trigger another referendum? For example: should the EU referendum result in Scotland being withdrawn against its will in 2017? That would appease many members and be the smart move. Another referendum so soon, just for the sake of it, would be a bit pointless and likely lose again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 I think this would be an error. It would look like a clear political trick - and she has so far managed to convince people that she is on a different level. She needs to be straight up with the Scottish people. We're good at sniffing out the bullshit. Not really. The Manifesto is for a five year period. It would be deceitful if there wasn't a commitment in the Manifesto for a Referendum then, during that five year period, a set of circumstances arose that merited calling a further Referendum. I think you would agree that this is a very real possibility.However if there was wording along the lines that Sturgeon outlined in the run up to the election just past; i.e. a material change to circumstances like EU withdrawal would give her an appropriate mandate. That seems to me both up front and legitimate. ETA Elixer beat me to it because I'm doing this with sausage fingers on an iPhone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevthedee Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Not really. The Manifesto is for a five year period. It would be deceitful if there wasn't a commitment in the Manifesto for a Referendum then, during that five year period, a set of circumstances arose that merited calling a further Referendum. I think you would agree that this is a very real possibility. However if there was wording along the lines that Sturgeon outlined in the run up to the election just past; i.e. a material change to circumstances like EU withdrawal would give her an appropriate mandate. That seems to me both up front and legitimate. ETA Elixer beat me to it because I'm doing this with sausage fingers on an iPhone. If sturgeon does not get extra powers over and above what the smith comission agreed to she may well use that as her reason to push for another vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 If sturgeon does not get extra powers over and above what the smith comission agreed to she may well use that as her reason to push for another vote. Indeed. #sexysocialism Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Considering all the parties involved agree that the Smith Commission doesn't go far enough, the Westminster Tories don't have much option but look into the Bill further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.