Kyle Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 That would make his next appearance his 26th... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deefiant Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 Anyone else loving that GD has reached a relevant seethe quota where he's writhing around in agony screaming the, frankly embarrassing Mad catchphrase "funsters" repeatedly. What an absolute mess. Poor c**t. Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 Plus the eight games he played for thistle. Would make his next game 25 appearances. Which seems a more likely benchmark. Why would the games for Thistle count? United are creating enough stories to laugh at as it is, what the fucking point in making stuff up instead? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deefiant Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 I heard muirhead left as he had to get a restraining order against a st Johnstone fan who kept texting him asking to suck him off whilst raking his manky nails down poor robbies inner thighs. Yet more sexual abuse at the dump. Saddening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dee67 Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 Why would the games for Thistle count? United are creating enough stories to laugh at as it is, what the fucking point in making stuff up instead? Dunno if they do and don't know if there is anything to this appearance money story. , but depending on the wording on the transfer deal about appearances(if there was such a clause) , ie) was it "1st team appearances for dundee united" or simply "1st team appearances" then they could count. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 Dunno if they do and don't know if there is anything to this appearance money story. , but depending on the wording on the transfer deal about appearances(if there was such a clause) , ie) was it "1st team appearances for dundee united" or simply "1st team appearances" then they could count. It would make absolutely no sense for United to negotiate a clause which would see them having to fork out money despite him playing for someone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dee67 Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 It would make absolutely no sense for United to negotiate a clause which would see them having to fork out money despite him playing for someone else. doubt they spent 150,000 on a player on the assumption they'd be lending him out to the jags within a few months. If there was an appearances clause then it was probably just a standard clause with the no of appearances filled in. Besides this is a club that thought Mixu was a good choice so who knows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 doubt they spent 150,000 on a player on the assumption they'd be lending him out to the jags within a few months. If there was an appearances clause then it was probably just a standard clause with the no of appearances filled in. Clubs spend money on players then loan them out all the time, its hardly a bewildering situation. Appearance clauses are only for when they play for the purchasing clubs, as anything else makes no sense. Neither does 26 games being the trigger point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dee67 Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 Clubs spend money on players then loan them out all the time, its hardly a bewildering situation. Appearance clauses are only for when they play for the purchasing clubs, as anything else makes no sense. Neither does 26 games being the trigger point. yes but i doubt united bought muirhead thinking he was going to be lent out so quickly (or at all) so if killie wanted an appearance clause and united could get away with paying less up front then why not? Depends on the clause in the transfer contract and as far as the selling club is concerned why should they care who he's played the games for? . And he played 16 games for united and 8 for thistle. So his next game would have been 25, which seems a bit more likely. As i said i've no idea if this story is crap or not but if the 8 games he played for thistle are included then it does make more sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 yes but i doubt united bought muirhead thinking he was going to be lent out so quickly (or at all) so if killie wanted an appearance clause and united could get away with paying less up front then why not? Depends on the clause in the transfer contract and as far as the selling club is concerned why should they care who he's played the games for? . And he played 16 games for united and 8 for thistle. So his next game would have been 25, which seems a bit more likely. As i said i've no idea if this story is crap or not but if the 8 games he played for thistle are included then it does make more sense. It only makes sense if you're desperately scrambling to find reasons to claim United are heading towards Admin, which for some reason every Dundee fan in the country has been peddling and making things up to support, for the past four years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dee67 Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 That would make his next appearance his 26th... i though he'd played 16 times for united? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dee67 Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 It only makes sense if you're desperately scrambling to find reasons to claim United are heading towards Admin, which for some reason every Dundee fan in the country has been peddling and making things up to support, for the past four years. doubt united are heading for admin but do think they may be wanting to avoid paying out thousands for a player they clearly don't rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underboyleheating Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 Goodbye United, it’s been fun we have shared so many good times, particularly 1991. Wishing you all the best in the championship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deeboy Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 doubt united are heading for admin but do think they may be wanting to avoid paying out thousands for a player they clearly don't rate. Depends how much it is, if his rumoured wages are what they are, his payoff could near match/eclipse it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee Bliss Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 Plus the eight games he played for thistle. Would make his next game 25 appearances. Which seems a more likely benchmark.Has took a Dee to figure it out, well done. 25 1st team appearances GDSDD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 Anyone else loving that GD has reached a relevant seethe quota where he's writhing around in agony screaming the, frankly embarrassing Mad catchphrase "funsters" repeatedly. What an absolute mess. Poor c**t. Thank you The 'thank you' patter is significantly worse than 'Funster'. Though I'm glad to know the term annoys you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 TOXIC. http://www.scotsman.com/sport/football/competitions/premiership/mixu-paatelainen-atmosphere-at-dundee-united-is-toxic-1-4115193 Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powerhouse7 Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 Got my ticket today for Derby, still think we are gonna get pumped Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stumigoo Posted April 30, 2016 Share Posted April 30, 2016 Rumoured admin, rumoured wages, rumoured clauses, rumoured fees. I just don't know what to believe anymore. I'm glad the Dundee fans are on hand to alert us of these issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.