Benjamin_Nevis Posted March 17, 2021 Share Posted March 17, 2021 Do folk still respond to Detournement with anything other than ridicule? Wow [emoji23] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted March 17, 2021 Share Posted March 17, 2021 Can only find two messages online and they mention pressurising the Police, events in London, Salmond firefighting being good for complainers and CPS action being a good thing. Are there more that mention Police providing information required for prosecution and informing the complainers, because if, for example, they show attempts to fabricate or alter evidence then that's clearly criminal. Completely agree with the inappropriate behaviour by Murrell with regard to the two messages I've read. He should do the decent thing and resign, but NS wasn't involved in the criminal investigation in any way was she? because that would be a real scandal (the Police under the supervision/direction of the Procurator Fiscal/Crown Office investigated the crimes). Murrell won't resign (and nobody else will either) until the committee publishes their report. To do so would be to pre-empt and therefore influence their findings. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted March 17, 2021 Share Posted March 17, 2021 Deafening silence from Salmond on all this. Was he quite happy to watch someone on the far right of the Tory party spout so much speculative shite on his behalf? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevthedee Posted March 17, 2021 Author Share Posted March 17, 2021 Deafening silence from Salmond on all this. Was he quite happy to watch someone on the far right of the Tory party spout so much speculative shite on his behalf?Salmond wants to cause as much shit as possible for the Scottish government so I doubt very much he cares who puts the boot in. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottsdad Posted March 17, 2021 Share Posted March 17, 2021 47 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said: Deafening silence from Salmond on all this. Was he quite happy to watch someone on the far right of the Tory party spout so much speculative shite on his behalf? Salmond and Davies are mates. When Salmond had his chat show at the fringe, Davies was one of his guests. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted March 17, 2021 Share Posted March 17, 2021 24 minutes ago, kevthedee said: Salmond wants to cause as much shit as possible for the Scottish government so I doubt very much he cares who puts the boot in. 1 minute ago, scottsdad said: Salmond and Davies are mates. When Salmond had his chat show at the fringe, Davies was one of his guests. Fucking hell. Guess he doesn't want to see an independent Scotland anytime soon. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CALDERON Posted March 17, 2021 Share Posted March 17, 2021 Salmond cares about Salmond more than anything else, even Scottish independence. It isn't a goal worth achieving, if his name has been dragged through the mud in the process. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paolo2143 Posted March 17, 2021 Share Posted March 17, 2021 1 hour ago, CALDERON said: Salmond cares about Salmond more than anything else, even Scottish independence. It isn't a goal worth achieving, if his name has been dragged through the mud in the process. I totally understand why he gave his evidence and testimony as he saw things to the committee. But it is clear that either him or someone very close to him is trying to drip feed info to the Unionist/Tory media to do maximum damage. Now that is something a lot of Indy supporters will never forgive. He has a book coming out soon , i am sure he will have ample opportunity to get his "revenge" after May 7th without it causing any further damage to Indy in meantime 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staggie_93 Posted March 17, 2021 Share Posted March 17, 2021 https://mobile.twitter.com/nickeardleybbc/status/1372229879027089409 David Davis talking shite. Who’d have thought it? 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardinal Richelieu Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 I've deleted all the posts from the last 12 hours and I'll be locking the thread for a day or two. When it reopens, try and keep things civil and refrain from unfounded allegations. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ghost of B A R P Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 Still classy, after all these smears... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ghost of B A R P Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 I realise Salmond’s statement is a bit long, so here’s a tl;dr version: Dear Nicola, Evans and Lloyd, pronto. I’ll be back for Murrell, Ruddick, and McCann later. Still time for you to save yourself the worst, doll. Yours for Scotland, Eck 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 36 minutes ago, The Ghost of B A R P said: I realise Salmond’s statement is a bit long, so here’s a tl;dr version: Dear Nicola, Evans and Lloyd, pronto. I’ll be back for Murrell, Ruddick, and McCann later. Still time for you to save yourself the worst, doll. Yours for Scotland, Eck You're an absolute nutcase. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ghost of B A R P Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 11 minutes ago, Day of the Lords said: You're an absolute nutcase. Great post. Have a greenie. Glad it was short enough for you to get through ok. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paolo2143 Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 51 minutes ago, Day of the Lords said: You're an absolute nutcase. lol What i did notice big Eck did was say he now wanted to get on with election and focus on issues like independence, on that we can agree. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SandyCromarty Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 (edited) What a mess Alex Salmond has made of his life. Fair enough he thought he had a genuine grievance but the touchy feely confession by him and his defense lawyer during the trial saying in public that Salmond was a sex pest and bully has left a stain. Now's he's back wanting blood and financial compensation from us. Better if he had went quiet after his jury victory, at least he won now he's looking like a bad loser after the findings in the Hamilton report. Edited March 25, 2021 by SandyCromarty 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 2 minutes ago, SandyCromarty said: What a mess Alex Salmond has made of his life. Fair enough he thought he had a genuine grievance but the touchy feely confession by him and his defense lawyer during the trial saying in public that Salmond was a sex pest and bully has left a stain. Now's he's back wanting blood and financial compensation from us. Better if he had went quiet after his jury victory, at least he won now he's looking like a bad loser after the findings in the Hamilton report. I don't know how I'd deal with folk making false accusations of this nature about me, I certainly wouldn't be impressed with their anonymity remaining intact. The fact that he's a sleazeball doesn't in my opinion grant anyone a free hit at fitting him up, it certainly hasn't helped the 1000's of women out there that are subjected to serious sexual assaults. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oneteaminglasgow Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 Yes, anyone who makes an allegation of sexual assault should have their anonymity compromised publicly if the allegation doesn’t lead to a conviction. That’ll definitely be a good thing for society. 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No_Problemo Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 1 minute ago, oneteaminglasgow said: Yes, anyone who makes an allegation of sexual assault should have their anonymity compromised publicly if the allegation doesn’t lead to a conviction. That’ll definitely be a good thing for society. This. Further to this, not being found guilty in a criminal court doesn't necessarily mean it was a false allegation. 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SandyCromarty Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 22 minutes ago, ayrmad said: I don't know how I'd deal with folk making false accusations of this nature about me, I certainly wouldn't be impressed with their anonymity remaining intact. The fact that he's a sleazeball doesn't in my opinion grant anyone a free hit at fitting him up, it certainly hasn't helped the 1000's of women out there that are subjected to serious sexual assaults. Read my post again and tell me where I made false accusations, I quoted his Defense Lawyer so maybe you should get in touch with him and put him right. I also mentioned that he thought he had a grievance but he stated in court that he was 'touchy feely' and talked of a 'sleepy cuddle', that where is that a false accusation if it comes from the horses mouth? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.