thepundit Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 You don't half talk some pish. If it ends up being us versus your mob then there is not a bookie in the land who will have Rangers as heavy favourites. Obviously they will. My guess is at least 3/1 Dundee and 4/6 Rangers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWilliamson Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 What chances were these? One of your on-loan midfielders had a long range shot in the first half, Tavernier scored and Waghorn missed a header just after but what else? Even Rangers' own highlights didn't show more than those three chances, yet showed six from Saints. Rangers fans, prompted by Warburton, have rewritten what actually happened that night. No they haven't as the Stats available prove... 62% Possession 38% 12 shots 6 2 on target 4 4 corners 2 9 fouls 17. I never said Rangers deserved to win the game, they clearly didn't , but they were never at anytime outplayed or Pumped as DeeMan puts it. For a supporter of a team who couldn't 'pump' Dumbarton he is being a helluva bullish in this thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWilliamson Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Obviously they will. My guess is at least 3/1 Dundee and 4/6 Rangers. If Dundee are 3/1 I would be tempted myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 You don't half talk some pish. If it ends up being us versus your mob then there is not a bookie in the land who will have Rangers as heavy favourites. And any Rangers fan construing my earlier post as we beat St Johnstone and St Johnstone beat Rangers therefore we would beat Rangers wants to have a word with themselves. Accepting that you have to get passed Dumbarton first, Paddy Power have Rangers @5/1 to lift the Scottish Cup and Dundee @20's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee Man Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 No they haven't as the Stats available prove... 62% Possession 38% 12 shots 6 2 on target 4 4 corners 2 9 fouls 17. I never said Rangers deserved to win the game, they clearly didn't , but they were never at anytime outplayed or Pumped as DeeMan puts it. For a supporter of a team who couldn't 'pump' Dumbarton he is being a helluva bullish in this thread I am merely shooting down the misplaced and unwarranted arrogance and over-confidence your fans are displaying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radford Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Rangers had two shots on target against us. The two Saints efforts that were off target were both included in Rangers' own highlights package; MacLean missing the best chance of the game from a few yards and Cummins header that had Foderingham scrambling but crept just wide. Saints were quite content to let Rangers have the ball as were confident they could handle that - which we did - and it meant we could target their weakness, the centre backs. The scoreline was nearer 6-1 than 3-2 that evening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myview Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Waghorn out for 6-8 weeks, that's plastic pitches for you. Surprised Rangers have let Hardie go out on loan after hearing about Waghorn's injury. Mind you it's only for a month. Is that to get him match fit for the run in? Probably. Warburton happy to run with Miller, OHalloran and Clark as a no 9. I for one from what I've seen would like Hardie to get a good run of games It's too early to say but I like what I've seen in the few matches he's played. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Surprised Rangers have let Hardie go out on loan after hearing about Waghorn's injury. Mind you it's only for a month. Is that to get him match fit for the run in? Probably. Warburton happy to run with Miller, OHalloran and Clark as a no 9. I for one from what I've seen would like Hardie to get a good run of games It's too early to say but I like what I've seen in the few matches he's played. Surprised at that too, can only think the agreed month long deal must have been signed and sealed before the extent of Waghorn's injury became clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RawB93 Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 So, "being kind", you give Rangers a 50/50 chance at Ibrox?.... And you have the audacity to claim I made a ludicrous statement by saying Rangers should win?... Rangers have the better players and the advantage of the match being at Ibrox. That makes them heavy favourites in my opinion and any result for Dundee would be considered an upset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myview Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 That could well be the case. I thought that too however most loan deals there is a clause that you can recall the player immediately. Although not confirmed they would have some idea on Tuesday night that it was not a minor injury. This will give King a better chance with Waghorn being out for 6/8 weeks. I've said before I firmly believe Warburton was going to play OHalloran wide right tho now he may have to review that. Don't rule Clark out now coming on for Miller after 50/60 mins or even starting. I hope Warburton does not get distracted with the cup it's the league Rangers must 100% focus on. If Hibs win at Easter Road again there could be only two points in it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caballero Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 After we dispose of Dumbarton, we will win at Ibrox in the first ever meeting of the clubs. Either Kevin Kyle or John Daly will net a late consolation for the new club after our front four have did the damage! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Rangers will be odds on if they play Dundee, If you're a betting man you will get at least 3/1 for Dundee. ^^^ mr william hill IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I am merely shooting down the misplaced and unwarranted arrogance and over-confidence your fans are displaying. I guess irony stopped crossing the Tay when its bridge collapsed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee Man Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I guess irony stopped crossing the Tay when its bridge collapsed. Irony isn't a physical entity that is capable of travelling on trains, m8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Irony isn't a physical entity that is capable of travelling on trains, m8. Ah well, so that excuse is gubbed then. How else do you explain your utter lack of self-awareness? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee Man Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Ah well, so that excuse is gubbed then. How else do you explain your utter lack of self-awareness? I'll take your point on board if you can show me any posts where I've said a) It will be us in the quarters and/or b) We will/should win against Rangers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I'll take your point on board if you can show me any posts where I've said a) It will be us in the quarters and/or b) We will/should win against Rangers. And how would that resolve anything? Your fans are showing, "misplaced and unwarranted arrogance and over-confidence" to use your own words. As I've said before, get back to us when you've qualified for the quarter finals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CowdenConvert Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 To be honest, no. He's a player who wasn't ready to play for Rangers so the club were right to let him move on.Kane took his chance to play for a club in a higher division and did well enough to earn himself a permanent move up the league the next season. Of course he wasn't ready to play for a diddy seaside league club as he was far better than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CGR Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Dee Man ragdolling the The_***cardine here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWilliamson Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 This was my reaction. The Dee Man is all over the place here. Getting himself into some state at the thought of playing The Rangers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.