GTG_03 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-41174619Will we ever learn?... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chlamydia Kid Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Correct. Also anti-abortion so he's into forced pregnancy too. It's only "forced" if she was impregnated against her will you utter hysterical fool. Where does your cut off point lie then when an abortion should be permitted? Presumably you don't think a woman should be allowed to abort a child at 8 months in- so are you into "forced pregnancy" if you don't allow it in the final 4 weeks? Utter desperation to tar anyone who doesn't believe in aborting kids as some form of extremist nutcase when in reality the overwhelming majority of the population always have been and probably always will be, at best, uncomfortable with it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 I for one am shocked the fascist nutter thinks women should be forced to carry a pregnancy to term regardless of the circumstances. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chlamydia Kid Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 He's a homophobe. Based on what? Voting against gay marriage? So that's it. He's been labelled as an "ist" or "phobe" for not wholeheartedly conforming to some modern day liberal shibboleth so everything he ever says or does should be disregarded? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 3 hours ago, Jmothecat2 said: I disagree, I would rather see politicians adapting their views for the greater good than sticking to principles. Putting principle over pragmatism isn't a good thing when those principles are so abhorrent, dangerous and out of touch with modern society. It's scary that so many Tories seem to think homophobic views etc shouldn't stop him from being PM. I wish Aung San Suu Kyi had stuck to her principles as the interpretation of the "greater good" can be very subjective. Just ask the Rohingya. At least if you stick to your principles people know what they are getting, bouncing around from the latest "good idea" (read popular) to the next is why we have such dire politics. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 11 minutes ago, The Chlamydia Kid said: It's only "forced" if she was impregnated against her will you utter hysterical fool.. Quote Asked whether his opposition applied in cases of pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, he replied: "I'm afraid so." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chlamydia Kid Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 I disagree, I would rather see politicians adapting their views for the greater good than sticking to principles. Putting principle over pragmatism isn't a good thing when those principles are so abhorrent, dangerous and out of touch with modern society. It's scary that so many Tories seem to think homophobic views etc shouldn't stop him from being PM. We put our trust in politicians to represent us. They should there have clear identifiable principles that they adhere to so we know what we are electing. How can you trust or have faith in someone who doesn't stick to some guiding principles? Otherwise you get individuals who would do what ever they could in the pursuit and protection of their power. They are guided by nothing other than having power. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chlamydia Kid Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 The mere fact he was anti abortion was enough for Baxter to condemn him as being in support of forced pregnancy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 That and the fact he's come out and said he's in support of forced pregnancy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Rees Moggs views are because he is devout catholic 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Looking forward to Kevin McKenna re-writing one of his four articles to include references to JRM. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Had to fix that for you. Religion is not an excuse. No i agree,i was just pointing out the reasons for his daftness,plus it was quite funny reading the watp 1690 airdrie fan trying to white knight him 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harry94 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Based on what? Voting against gay marriage? So that's it. He's been labelled as an "ist" or "phobe" for not wholeheartedly conforming to some modern day liberal shibboleth so everything he ever says or does should be disregarded? He either wants to impose his interpretation of religion on other people or is homophobic and views homosexuality as wrong.If people are against gay marriage, they don't have to have one but voting against that right for others is abhorrent and a pretty inhumane thing to do.I get the whole argument for abortion as it's a pretty grey issue in many aspects and the whole definition of life thing is difficult. I couldn't accept somebody who would actively discriminate against others though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmothecat2 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 It's only "forced" if she was impregnated against her will you utter hysterical fool. Where does your cut off point lie then when an abortion should be permitted? Presumably you don't think a woman should be allowed to abort a child at 8 months in- so are you into "forced pregnancy" if you don't allow it in the final 4 weeks? Utter desperation to tar anyone who doesn't believe in aborting kids as some form of extremist nutcase when in reality the overwhelming majority of the population always have been and probably always will be, at best, uncomfortable with it. Anyone who doesn't agree with abortion is an extremist nutjob, who believes women with unwanted features should be forced to give birth needlessly. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmothecat2 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Based on what? Voting against gay marriage? So that's it. He's been labelled as an "ist" or "phobe" for not wholeheartedly conforming to some modern day liberal shibboleth so everything he ever says or does should be disregarded? He stated clearly he does not believe gay people should be allowed to get married. That is homophobic. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chlamydia Kid Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 No i agree,i was just pointing out the reasons for his daftness,plus it was quite funny reading the watp 1690 airdrie fan trying to white knight him Defending someone's right to hold an opinion is not "white knighting" them. I must say though I was absolutely shocked that the views I was defending the right to hold were in tune with the thoughts of the roman Catholic Church... everydays a school day. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1320Lichtie Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Is phasing out petrol and diesel cars for good really feasible by the way? Seems to be the in thing just now around the world but we use electric cars at work and it's shite. Do they actually want to totally eradicate petrol and diesel cars for good? I haven't looked into it too much and only seen the headline but surely not..? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 3 minutes ago, 1320Lichtie said: Is phasing out petrol and diesel cars for good really feasible by the way? Seems to be the in thing just now around the world but we use electric cars at work and it's shite. Do they actually want to totally eradicate petrol and diesel cars for good? I haven't looked into it too much and only seen the headline but surely not..? The target date is in the 2030s. We'll have flying cars by then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted September 6, 2017 Author Share Posted September 6, 2017 44 minutes ago, doulikefish said: Rees Moggs views are because he is a c**t 22 minutes ago, Bairnardo said: Had to fix that for you. Religion is not an excuse. Fixed that for both of you. BTW it is totally acceptable to be intolerant of someone who is intolerant based upon a narrow, biased view of the world. The world would be a far better place if Jacob Rees-Mogg dropped down dead tomorrow. Probably wouldn't lessen his chances of being elected Tory leader either. PS has wee Ruthie expressed a view on the homophobic c**t yet? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Defending someone's right to hold an opinion is not "white knighting" them. . You made a total fukwit of yourself because you seen it was the tory rights darling without actually reading or seeing the interview to try and make yourself edgy as per normal 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.