Jump to content

General Politics Thread


Granny Danger

Recommended Posts

Some interesting demographic analysis in the press today.

For years we've been told that Scotland is no more "inclusive" or "civic" than the rest of the UK. Well it turns out that while on average there isn't much in it, the detailed stats show the following:

1) Scots polled as Indy/SNP voters are more likely than people in the rest of the UK to be positive about immigration and multiculturalism. 

However,

2) Scots polled as being supportive of "unionist" parties (Labour and Tories specifically being highlighted) are less likely than people in the rest of the UK to be positive about immigration and multiculturalism.

The esteemed Prof. Sir John Curtice (as so loved by Unionists any time his psephologist skillset allowed him to make a point that sounded bad for the Yes campaign) explained it on Radio Scotland this morning.  He went as far as to describe it as unusually civic nationalism in Scotland.

So the upshot is: if it wasn't for the less tolerant, and in some cases xenophobic, unionists, Scotland would be a more tolerant place.

 

Edited by milton75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, milton75 said:

Some interesting demographic analysis in the press today.

For years we've been told that Scotland is no more "inclusive" or "civic" than the rest of the UK. Well it turns out that while on average there isn't much in it, the detailed stats show the following:

1) Scots polled as Indy/SNP voters are more likely than people in the rest of the UK to be positive about immigration and multiculturalism. 

However,

2) Scots polled as being supportive of "unionist" parties (Labour and Tories specifically being highlighted) are less likely than people in the rest of the UK to be positive about immigration and multiculturalism.

The esteemed Prof. Sir John Curtice (as so loved by Unionists any time his psephologist skillset allowed him to make a point that sounded bad for the Yes campaign) explained it on Radio Scotland this morning.  He went as far as to describe it as unusually civic nationalism in Scotland.

So the upshot is: if it wasn't for the less tolerant, and in some cases xenophobic, unionists, Scotland would be a more tolerant place.

 

I'm sure everyone else is as shocked by this as I am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, milton75 said:

Some interesting demographic analysis in the press today.

For years we've been told that Scotland is no more "inclusive" or "civic" than the rest of the UK. Well it turns out that while on average there isn't much in it, the detailed stats show the following:

1) Scots polled as Indy/SNP voters are more likely than people in the rest of the UK to be positive about immigration and multiculturalism. 

However,

2) Scots polled as being supportive of "unionist" parties (Labour and Tories specifically being highlighted) are less likely than people in the rest of the UK to be positive about immigration and multiculturalism.

The esteemed Prof. Sir John Curtice (as so loved by Unionists any time his psephologist skillset allowed him to make a point that sounded bad for the Yes campaign) explained it on Radio Scotland this morning.  He went as far as to describe it as unusually civic nationalism in Scotland.

So the upshot is: if it wasn't for the less tolerant, and in some cases xenophobic, unionists, Scotland would be a more tolerant place.

 

But, but, nationalist means nazi. They pure hate ra English by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, milton75 said:

Some interesting demographic analysis in the press today.

For years we've been told that Scotland is no more "inclusive" or "civic" than the rest of the UK. Well it turns out that while on average there isn't much in it, the detailed stats show the following:

1) Scots polled as Indy/SNP voters are more likely than people in the rest of the UK to be positive about immigration and multiculturalism. 

However,

2) Scots polled as being supportive of "unionist" parties (Labour and Tories specifically being highlighted) are less likely than people in the rest of the UK to be positive about immigration and multiculturalism.

The esteemed Prof. Sir John Curtice (as so loved by Unionists any time his psephologist skillset allowed him to make a point that sounded bad for the Yes campaign) explained it on Radio Scotland this morning.  He went as far as to describe it as unusually civic nationalism in Scotland.

So the upshot is: if it wasn't for the less tolerant, and in some cases xenophobic, unionists, Scotland would be a more tolerant place.

 

Have a source for this, it sounds plausible but also rife for statistical skullduggery. Point 2, of course a subset of folk away from the average are going to be away from the average of the entire set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Big Rider said:

But, but, nationalist means nazi. They pure hate ra English by the way.

You get some loud thick fucks that promotes that view.

45 minutes ago, BawWatchin said:

Can't speak for everyone, but i'm hating them more and more as time goes on. bQshDtu.png

 

Edited by thisal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...