Jump to content

General Politics Thread


Granny Danger

Recommended Posts

On ‎10‎/‎06‎/‎2019 at 00:09, jupe1407 said:

Mental as it is, Rockall is part of the Western Isles Council area and comes under the Parish of Harris emoji38.png

Pitcairn Island in the middle of the Pacific is regarded as part of Kent.  When accusations of sexual predators came about, it was some officers from Kent constabulary who had to out and investigate - and arrest almost every adult male on the island.  I suppose it makes a change from shoplifters in Canterbury.

On that note, I wonder if there is probably somebody in Tarbert who has to make a routine visit to Rockall to see that nothing criminal is going on.  You never know!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/9/2019 at 09:53, MixuFixit said:

This was an interesting thread to read:

 

 

The Danish Social Democrats won votes from right wing parties. They also lost votes but they went to parties in the Left bloc which resulted in the Left bloc taking power with the SDs as the largest party.

More generally it's not sustainable to maintain a welfare state, large scale immigration and EU regulated fiscal austerity. One of the three has to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, welshbairn said:

Greenwald's generating a fair bit of seethe over there.

https://twitter.com/hashtag/DeportaGreenwald?src=hash

The fact that he and his husband are doing this after their friend was murdered by militias linked to Bolsonaro is incredibly brave.

I've recently read 'The Open Veins of Latin America' by Eduardo Galeano. It's extremely depressing. Things could get very ugly, very easily in South America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tibbermoresaint said:

You're obviously trolling, but this is drivel.

How can it be possible to continually reduce spending whilst providing more services?


http://piketty.blog.lemonde.fr/2018/07/10/europe-migrants-and-trade/

Quote


According to the most recent ECB (European Central Bank) data the trade surplus of the Euro zone stood at 530 billion Euros in 2017, or almost 5% of the GDP of the Euro zone (11,200 billion Euros) and the trend is the same in 2018. In other words, each time the countries in the Euro zone produce 100 units of goods and services, they only consume and invest 95 in their own country. The gap may seem narrow but, repeated year by year, it is in reality considerable. Never in economic history, or at least never since the existence of trade statistics (that is, since the beginning of the 19th century) have we found evidence of such a huge trade surplus for an economy of this size.


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Detournement said:

The fact that he and his husband are doing this after their friend was murdered by militias linked to Bolsonaro is incredibly brave.

I've recently read 'The Open Veins of Latin America' by Eduardo Galeano. It's extremely depressing. Things could get very ugly, very easily in South America.

Into his football too.

51GKaGwXXUL._SX324_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Detournement said:

How can it be possible to continually reduce spending whilst providing more services?


http://piketty.blog.lemonde.fr/2018/07/10/europe-migrants-and-trade/

 

We aren't continually reducing spending and I doubt many people think we're providing more services.

I've no idea why you think the Piketty quote and link are relevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tibbermoresaint said:

We aren't continually reducing spending and I doubt many people think we're providing more services.

I've no idea why you think the Piketty quote and link are relevant.

If you increase the size of the population you need more services, that's obvious surely? If the immigrants have a high birth rate then that is compounded.

The Piketty quote is the perfect example of why the EU economy is failing. 5% every year just disappearing out of the Eurozone. No doubt ending up offshore and being invested into lower wage economies.

Migrants aren't going to stop coming so it'll either be the welfare state or the fiscal austerity that go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Detournement said:

If you increase the size of the population you need more services, that's obvious surely? If the immigrants have a high birth rate then that is compounded.

The Piketty quote is the perfect example of why the EU economy is failing. 5% every year just disappearing out of the Eurozone. No doubt ending up offshore and being invested into lower wage economies.

Migrants aren't going to stop coming so it'll either be the welfare state or the fiscal austerity that go.

This is racist bollocks. And you're utterly clueless about economics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

We need immigration to service an aging population.

You hear that quite a lot but you also hear that workers are going to be put out a job by automation, both points can't be true. The reality is that massive amounts of existing jobs are completely pointless and millions of people are underemployed.

The reason why we "need" immigration is to service an economic system based on exploitation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dunno what to add about the Denmark stuff except a lot of people have gone silent after the “socialists” made that Strasserite pledge to confiscate stuff from asylum seekers and distribute it to Danes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, NotThePars said:

Dunno what to add about the Denmark stuff except a lot of people have gone silent after the “socialists” made that Strasserite pledge to confiscate stuff from asylum seekers and distribute it to Danes.

They made no such pledge of course but don't let facts interfere with your agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, NotThePars said:

Dunno what to add about the Denmark stuff except a lot of people have gone silent after the “socialists” made that Strasserite pledge to confiscate stuff from asylum seekers and distribute it to Danes.

That was the Venstre Party, centre to not so centre right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They made no such pledge of course but don't let facts interfere with your agenda.

 

Well, they’ve agreed to continue backing a law which allows them to confiscate valuables off asylum seekers with some pretty easily manipulated justification. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/05/centre-left-social-democrats-set-to-win-in-denmark-elections

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, NotThePars said:

Dunno what to add about the Denmark stuff except a lot of people have gone silent after the “socialists” made that Strasserite pledge to confiscate stuff from asylum seekers and distribute it to Danes.

That's not what happened though. Asylum seekers with assets over 10,000 Kroner have to contribute towards their accommodation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, NotThePars said:

 

Well, they’ve agreed to continue backing a law which allows them to confiscate valuables off asylum seekers with some pretty easily manipulated justification. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/05/centre-left-social-democrats-set-to-win-in-denmark-elections

At no point have they taken things from asylum seekers to "distribute it to Danes".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...