Jump to content

Follow Follow Rangers. Season 2024/25


Recommended Posts

Rangers have been hit with FIVE SFA charges following their scathing statement on ref Willie Collum.


The Ibrox club slammed the whistler after his decision to send off Daniel Candeias during the win over St Mirren earlier this month.


They released a wide-ranging statement that called Collum's ability into question and appealed the sending off - citing "underlying issues" with his performance.


The challenge was later thrown out by the SFA following an appeal hearing.


Hampden bosses later released reasons behind Collum's decision to dismiss Candeias for two bookable offences.


And now the governing body are set to drag Rangers into the dock over the saga.

The charges include indicating bias or incompetence on the part of a match official, bringing the game into disrepute and failing to act in the best interests of the game.


Rangers have been given until Tuesday, December 4 to respond to the charges, with a hearing set for Wednesday, December 19.


More to follow
Good for the SFA. Hopefully they will dock some points from this odious club.

It's partly their own fault, of course, for allowing an individual like King into the Scottish game.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BobWilliamson said:

What has the Compliant Officer , Willie Collum , Kevin Clancy and Peter Lawwell all have in common?

The SFA are starting a fight they have literally no chance of winning.  Every man and their dog knows Collum is an incompetent arrogant fool who has lied to save face.

Which charges do you disagree with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What has the Compliant Officer , Willie Collum , Kevin Clancy and Peter Lawwell all have in common?
The SFA are starting a fight they have literally no chance of winning.  Every man and their dog knows Collum is an incompetent arrogant fool who has lied to save face.



I don’t know, what do they have in common?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Dons_1988 said:

Which charges do you disagree with?

Them all. The SFA have played right into Rangers hands.

The SFA handed Rangers two officials conspired together to wrongly send a Rangers player off

Everyone agreed it was a ‘mistake’ to send off Candieas and the RE Teacher has simply made up a reason to try and justify it. There is video evidence he never saw the incident he’s now claiming 

Nobody should be above criticism 

We can go back to last season and show proof that Jack was unfairly treated, Morelos is referred to a different standard

Rangers simply must take them the whole way. Absolutely No Surrender!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Them all. The SFA have played right into Rangers hands.
The SFA handed Rangers two officials conspired together to wrongly send a Rangers player off
Everyone agreed it was a ‘mistake’ to send off Candieas and the RE Teacher has simply made up a reason to try and justify it. There is video evidence he never saw the incident he’s now claiming 
Nobody should be above criticism 
We can go back to last season and show proof that Jack was unfairly treated, Morelos is referred to a different standard
Rangers simply must take them the whole way. Absolutely No Surrender!!
Might I ask why you felt the need to mention Collums job?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, BobWilliamson said:

Them all. The SFA have played right into Rangers hands.

The SFA handed Rangers two officials conspired together to wrongly send a Rangers player off

Everyone agreed it was a ‘mistake’ to send off Candieas and the RE Teacher has simply made up a reason to try and justify it. There is video evidence he never saw the incident he’s now claiming 

Nobody should be above criticism 

We can go back to last season and show proof that Jack was unfairly treated, Morelos is referred to a different standard

Rangers simply must take them the whole way. Absolutely No Surrender!!

Have another greenie for effort :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Them all. The SFA have played right into Rangers hands.
The SFA handed Rangers two officials conspired together to wrongly send a Rangers player off
Everyone agreed it was a ‘mistake’ to send off Candieas and the RE Teacher has simply made up a reason to try and justify it. There is video evidence he never saw the incident he’s now claiming 
Nobody should be above criticism 
We can go back to last season and show proof that Jack was unfairly treated, Morelos is referred to a different standard
Rangers simply must take them the whole way. Absolutely No Surrender!!


The charges don’t relate to Collums handling of the game, they relate to rangers reaction.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are people who actually think there is a conspiracy against Rangers.
Just try to get your minds around that.


Of course there’s a conspiracy against them, they had a player booked and they don’t think he should’ve been booked, how much more evidence do you need?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...