bennett Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 38 minutes ago, Bohemian said: It wasn't funny the first 4 or 5 times you cracked this one Vicky...get some new material ffs... Another lovely morning my learned friend, anything interesting planned? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearthammer Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 Let him be. The net effect is that his (current) team have lots of other courts to be defeated in. It's a racket a and they'll get what they deserve - a grand slam. Love ok, i'll get ma Fred Perry top. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Public menace Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 Don't tell me that celtics demanding the mens singles championship ...... Not like you to bring up Celtic unprovoked benny? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bohemian Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 12 minutes ago, bennett said: Another lovely morning my learned friend, anything interesting planned? I said new material ffs Vicky... that's the same old nonsense, you need to up your game, you're becoming predictable, repetitive and boring... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 2 hours ago, cyderspaceman said: I don't suppose folk like this will EVER stop and think ' Hey, maybe, just maybe, it's us, not them.' , when under fire from a large number of unaligned sources. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 13 hours ago, Green Day said: I see Douglas Park has offered to pay for an independent enquiry from his own pocket. Doesnt that mean its then not really "independent", or am I just being a daft pape? A promise to pay from Rangers, call me cynical but I'm not sure I'd be rushing to take up that offer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 Just now, Sergeant Wilson said: A promise to pay from Rangers, call me cynical but I'm not sure I'd be rushing to take up that offer. As long as they're explicitly named in the contract with the independent investigators. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 2 hours ago, Public menace said: Not like you to bring up Celtic unprovoked benny? Thou shall not have a dig at celtic. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C4mmy31 Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, bennett said: Another lovely morning my learned friend, anything interesting planned? My Learned Friend : Used by a barrister or solicitor in court to address or refer to another barrister or solicitor. ^^^ Douglas Parks legal counsel found ^^^ Edited May 10, 2020 by C4mmy31 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alta-pete Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 2 hours ago, Bohemian said: I said new material ffs Vicky... that's the same old nonsense, you need to up your game, you're becoming predictable, repetitive and boring... Another chance to wheel out Yoda... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bohemian Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 A Yoda Meme.. original stuff again from ra peepul... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 3 hours ago, Public menace said: Not like you to bring up Celtic unprovoked benny? Celtic FC is the only show in town for Sevco fans. Hardly surprising tbh. They've got f**k all else. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 10, 2020 Author Share Posted May 10, 2020 On 09/05/2020 at 08:56, cyderspaceman said: Continuity League Of Tory Scotland. I like that - but it's maybe a bit ambitious. With Partick being part of the Coalition of the Just will we be seeing 50/50 Rangers/PT scarves in Maryhill next year? On 09/05/2020 at 13:45, TrebleTwenty said: I agree, we should have focused on how we get though this virus with minimal damage to our game & clubs. But the circus down govan way was never going to let that happen at any cost, while they thought they could still stop 9. If we think this is a meltdown, just wait till 10, whenever the new season starts, that’s if this new outfit survive. I just had a read at ICT's Carlsberg Statement and this para stood out: We believe that serious questions remain over the actions of the MD of one club during the now infamous vote on April 10th and what happened between the submission of their legally binding ‘No’ vote before the fake 5pm deadline and 5 days later when they became the only club out of 42 to have “negotiations” with the CEO and Chairman of the SPFL and with “big hitters” or persons unknown, before being allowed to vote for a second time. This time to carry the SPFL Board’s resolution with a Yes vote. A genuinely independent investigation is the only possible route to try and uncover what happened and it may or may not reveal the reasoning behind their apparently contradictory statements since then. Now given that and also that your club's chairman was embarrassingly exposed by the SPFL Exec and was inveigled in to the manipulated ballot process, how can you post about this being about Rangers? It isn't. We have a league organisation whose execs have behaved reprehensibly and should be called to account. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 1 hour ago, The_Kincardine said: I like that - but it's maybe a bit ambitious. With Partick being part of the Coalition of the Just will we be seeing 50/50 Rangers/PT scarves in Maryhill next year? I just had a read at ICT's Carlsberg Statement and this para stood out: We believe that serious questions remain over the actions of the MD of one club during the now infamous vote on April 10th and what happened between the submission of their legally binding ‘No’ vote before the fake 5pm deadline and 5 days later when they became the only club out of 42 to have “negotiations” with the CEO and Chairman of the SPFL and with “big hitters” or persons unknown, before being allowed to vote for a second time. This time to carry the SPFL Board’s resolution with a Yes vote. A genuinely independent investigation is the only possible route to try and uncover what happened and it may or may not reveal the reasoning behind their apparently contradictory statements since then. Now given that and also that your club's chairman was embarrassingly exposed by the SPFL Exec and was inveigled in to the manipulated ballot process, how can you post about this being about Rangers? It isn't. We have a league organisation whose execs have behaved reprehensibly and should be called to account. Dundee are under no obligation to explain why they changed their minds. All we have are some clubs saying that they think something dodgy might have happened and they want the SPFL to pay for an inquiry to satisfy their curiosity. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 10, 2020 Author Share Posted May 10, 2020 Just now, The DA said: Dundee are under no obligation to explain why they changed their minds. All we have are some clubs saying that they think something dodgy might have happened and they want the SPFL to pay for an inquiry to satisfy their curiosity. I know that John Unicorns and Rainbows Nelms was played like a fiddle so I can understand why he may well be embarrassed by this whole process and will keep his gob shut. However, the question is not what 'big hitter glamour' he was fooled by but the process of his vote being rescinded in the first place. Interesting to listen to an experienced lawyer such Hearts' Les Deans on Sportsound yesterday scoff at this and call the change of a legally cast vote in to question. Same with Partick's QC in his analysis a couple of weeks ago. The SPFL botched the vote in the most egregious fashion so, of course, it has to be reviewed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 I know that John Unicorns and Rainbows Nelms was played like a fiddle so I can understand why he may well be embarrassed by this whole process and will keep his gob shut. However, the question is not what 'big hitter glamour' he was fooled by but the process of his vote being rescinded in the first place. Interesting to listen to an experienced lawyer such Hearts' Les Deans on Sportsound yesterday scoff at this and call the change of a legally cast vote in to question. Same with Partick's QC in his analysis a couple of weeks ago. The SPFL botched the vote in the most egregious fashion so, of course, it has to be reviewed.What rules were broken? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theroadlesstravelled Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 It’s takes some doing but Rangers are showing themselves to be less cuntish that the SPFL. Hopefully the truth comes out. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 6 minutes ago, Theroadlesstravelled said: It’s takes some doing but Rangers are showing themselves to be less cuntish that the SPFL. Hopefully the truth comes out. No they aren't. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 8 minutes ago, DA Baracus said: No they aren't. Come on mate, are you really happy with the spfl's behaviour during this? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnydun Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 7 hours ago, The_Kincardine said: I like that - but it's maybe a bit ambitious. With Partick being part of the Coalition of the Just will we be seeing 50/50 Rangers/PT scarves in Maryhill next year? I just had a read at ICT's Carlsberg Statement and this para stood out: We believe that serious questions remain over the actions of the MD of one club during the now infamous vote on April 10th and what happened between the submission of their legally binding ‘No’ vote before the fake 5pm deadline and 5 days later when they became the only club out of 42 to have “negotiations” with the CEO and Chairman of the SPFL and with “big hitters” or persons unknown, before being allowed to vote for a second time. This time to carry the SPFL Board’s resolution with a Yes vote. A genuinely independent investigation is the only possible route to try and uncover what happened and it may or may not reveal the reasoning behind their apparently contradictory statements since then. Now given that and also that your club's chairman was embarrassingly exposed by the SPFL Exec and was inveigled in to the manipulated ballot process, how can you post about this being about Rangers? It isn't. We have a league organisation whose execs have behaved reprehensibly and should be called to account. I have highlighted a section, as this was written by a guy who had "negotiations" with the CEO's of Dundee and Partick Thistle prior to the vote. They just didn't go his way and he now feels very bitter. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.