bennett Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 He was jumping up and down a bit earlier. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimi Shandrix Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 4 minutes ago, bennett said: He was jumping up and down a bit earlier. Jim Spence is a knob. However, the torn faced one will be receiving a retrospective red. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 10 minutes ago, Jimi Shandrix said: Jim Spence is a knob. However, the torn faced one will be receiving a retrospective red. Unless I'm mistaken, the rules are if the referee has dealt with it the compliance officer can't touch it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMCs Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 Just now, G51 said: Unless I'm mistaken, the rules are if the referee has dealt with it the compliance officer can't touch it. Whatever results in the maximum heads gone will suit me pal 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimi Shandrix Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 1 minute ago, G51 said: Unless I'm mistaken, the rules are if the referee has dealt with it the compliance officer can't touch it. Fucking hell. I only saw the incident, not the game. You mean the referee gave him a yellow? Christ. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 2 minutes ago, Jimi Shandrix said: Fucking hell. I only saw the incident, not the game. You mean the referee gave him a yellow? Christ. Wait till you see the elbow Goldson took from Ryan Edwards that went unpunished. You'll shit your pants. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimi Shandrix Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 1 minute ago, G51 said: Wait till you see the elbow Goldson took from Ryan Edwards that went unpunished. You'll shit your pants. I look forward to that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 1 minute ago, Jimi Shandrix said: I look forward to that. You'll look forward to shitting your pants? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimi Shandrix Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 2 minutes ago, G51 said: You'll look forward to shitting your pants? Yeah. Sounds great. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 2 minutes ago, Jimi Shandrix said: Yeah. Sounds great. Not one for kinkshaming, so wire in. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimi Shandrix Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 1 minute ago, G51 said: Not one for kinkshaming, so wire in. Too late. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TommyLeePwns Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 44 minutes ago, bennett said: He was jumping up and down a bit earlier. First time I've ever seen a head of hair that looks like it has a questionable hard drive. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 16 hours ago, G51 said: Wait till you see the elbow Goldson took from Ryan Edwards that went unpunished. You'll shit your pants. This is No8 levels of whataboutery. Just saying. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raidernation Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 I see slippy has been channeling Wenger [emoji23] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJF Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 That's Morelos now been cited by the compliance officer. Sheer stupidity from him now means he'll likely be suspended for 3 matches during our busiest month of the season. Clueless. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 We all know why this has happened... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 (edited) Operation Stop The Ten appears to have hit a snag. Ordinarily I wouldn't have a problem with this - I think I said at the time that I could see it being either a yellow or a red, and if you want to argue either way then fine - BUT: 1) It's an interesting precedent to set and one that is likely to lead to a much bigger workload for the ex-referees (I think there was a similar case last season too IIRC). If we're saying that yellow cards can be upgraded to red cards if we feel that the act itself could constitute violent conduct, I can think of multiple incidents in the last few weeks that could be cited. Which leads me on to... 2) Very much feels like the disciplinary process is conducted by a casino and is based on a game of chance. It's extremely difficult to work out what gets cited and what doesn't these days, and the process is extremely inconsistent. I genuinely think the few months we had where the Compliance Officer appeared to vanish off the face of the Earth were much more preferable to prolonging the tedious bickering over potential red-card offences by tryhards that haven't even read the rulebook. There is nothing worse than arguing about interpretation of a set of rules on a Monday when there is actual football to be talked about. 3) The media very clearly has a disproportionate influence on the disciplinary process, and that's a problem because our journalists are mostly fucking idiots that don't know the rules. 4) If upheld, this gives Itten a chance to really cement his place, which he has earned. However, we'll probably just march a team of lawyers into the SFA offices and get off with it like we normally do (this is also a problem and shows why the disciplinary process doesn't work, as it disproportionately punishes smaller clubs who can't afford to do this). So I anticipate almost no effect on Rangers as a result of this. 5) What is so special about violent conduct red-card offences that makes them reviewable, when other red card offences are not? Edited December 15, 2020 by G51 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 Being cited for an offence that the referee saw and booked him for? Very inconsistent again with the rules and answers a question recently posed by Gerrard. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 Rangers agm today and not one celtic fan has given us their expert analysis, strange times... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cptn Hooch Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 Years ago Jason Talbot caught a hearts player with a high boot...he was booked for the offence at the time, however, the compliance officer reviewed it and gave him a multiple game ban. Just a few weeks ago Jason Holt caught a St Mirren player with a hard, high tackle which was given as a foul. It was reviewed after the match by the compliance officer and he was given a 2 game ban. This isn't a new thing the governing body have brought in to hinder the rangers' efforts in stopping 10 in a row...ITS....THE.....RULES 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.