Pet Jeden Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 3 minutes ago, hearthammer said: He has made it his raison d'etre to push for london to be the epicentre of the 1st world, more so than previous incumbents. In 6 (Brexit dominated) weeks? How? And don't go back to his London mayor days - that was his job! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pet Jeden Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 9 minutes ago, The Moonster said: I'm not explaining your own shitposting to you. Just know that everyone is seeing you for the sad wee troll you are. No, please do. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 5 minutes ago, hearthammer said: Eyes doon. The SC judgement is imminent . . . . . . . Could be a long day. https://www.supremecourt.uk/live/court-01.html 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pet Jeden Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 4 minutes ago, hearthammer said: Eyes doon. The SC judgement is imminent . . . . . . . Massive, complicated constitutional law questions that have troubled 4 other UK courts. Aye, right enough - decision after just one hour. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arch Stanton Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 Could be a long day. https://www.supremecourt.uk/live/court-01.htmlAlso on BBC2 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arch Stanton Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 What a joke, the printed document and electronic version do not have matching page numbers 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedgecutter Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 (edited) 31 minutes ago, welshbairn said: Could be a long day. https://www.supremecourt.uk/live/court-01.html If they continue to make an embarrassment of themselves by all having different versions of the documents, then absolutely. To think the Daily Mail comments referred to the Scottish court as "tinpot". Edited September 17, 2019 by Hedgecutter 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted September 17, 2019 Author Share Posted September 17, 2019 So much for the environment. What a fucking waste of paper. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 38 minutes ago, hearthammer said: Eyes doon. The SC judgement is imminent . . . . . . . Hardly... They've just discovered they've all got bundles of documents with differing page numbers so not all preaching from the same hymn sheets! Could take quite a while to sort this out - I think it take a few days for this court to arrive at a decision they way it's going just now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The OP Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 1 hour ago, Pet Jeden said: You're in politics? You were the one changing facts entirely to support the idiotic position you have taken up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pet Jeden Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 49 minutes ago, The Moonster said: I'm not explaining your own shitposting to you. Just know that everyone is seeing you for the sad wee troll you are. Sad - debatable. (You're not one of my kids, are you)? Wee - No I'm not. I'm five foot five and three quarters. Troll - Pah! No way. I didn't even bring up your criminal record. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted September 17, 2019 Author Share Posted September 17, 2019 Hardly... They've just discovered they've all got bundles of documents with differing page numbers so not all preaching from the same hymn sheets! Could take quite a while to sort this out - I think it take a few days for this court to arrive at a decision they way it's going just now. Watching that, what a fucking farce. Imagine him representing someone facing the death row. This is laughable 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 If I was the lawyer presenting the case and the file numbers didn't match I would have just burst into tears. Impressed by how clear he is and without using any incomprehensible jargon. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedgecutter Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 (edited) This just reminds me of the Mr Bean episode in which he realises he's been working with the wrong envelope / bundle at the last minute. That and this: Edited September 17, 2019 by Hedgecutter 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearthammer Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 1 hour ago, Pet Jeden said: Massive, complicated constitutional law questions that have troubled 4 other UK courts. Aye, right enough - decision after just one hour. I was referring to the commencement. Its over 3 days ya fanny. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearthammer Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 56 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said: Hardly... They've just discovered they've all got bundles of documents with differing page numbers so not all preaching from the same hymn sheets! Could take quite a while to sort this out - I think it take a few days for this court to arrive at a decision they way it's going just now. I was aware the proceedings were over 3 days. My terminology i accept suggested it was "noo". 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alert Mongoose Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 If you don't mind Mr Rennie, can you ram your statement up your arse. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 2 minutes ago, Alert Mongoose said: If you don't mind Mr Rennie, can you ram your statement up your arse. Not sure what statement you might be referring to here, but whatever it is, I totally agree with you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 I could be wrong but it appears that the judges are considering effect of prorogation as well as the initial motive. Can see it going either way. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.