Mark Connolly Posted January 18, 2021 Share Posted January 18, 2021 11 minutes ago, Colkitto said: Read that while doing a Sean Connery impression and it's equally true. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted January 18, 2021 Share Posted January 18, 2021 The lorries protesting in London today were mostly representative of the live fish export industry ie crabs and lobsters predominantly. These are not Brexit voting trawlermen and most of the creel fishing community were firmly anti Brexit as they saw this coming a mile off. To see the police deployed to stop and spot check the lorries for any defect they could find was just pathetic (reported now on STV news) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted January 18, 2021 Share Posted January 18, 2021 Just now, Billy Jean King said: The lorries protesting in London today were mostly representative of the live fish export industry ie crabs and lobsters predominantly. These are not Brexit voting trawlermen and most of the creel fishing community were firmly anti Brexit as they saw this coming a mile off. To see the police deployed to stop and spot check the lorries for any defect they could find was just pathetic (reported now on STV news) A few 200 quid fines dished out aswell 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted January 18, 2021 Share Posted January 18, 2021 13 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said: The lorries protesting in London today were mostly representative of the live fish export industry ie crabs and lobsters predominantly. These are not Brexit voting trawlermen and most of the creel fishing community were firmly anti Brexit as they saw this coming a mile off. To see the police deployed to stop and spot check the lorries for any defect they could find was just pathetic (reported now on STV news) Maybe so, but one of the most vocal ones from Loch Fynne was pro Leave. Also do they have input into the SFF? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted January 18, 2021 Share Posted January 18, 2021 A few 200 quid fines dished out aswell 200 squid you say ! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted January 18, 2021 Share Posted January 18, 2021 Maybe so, but one of the most vocal ones from Loch Fynne was pro Leave. Also do they have input into the SFF?Wasn't that the Oyster farming operation run by the Duke out of Inverary ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted January 18, 2021 Share Posted January 18, 2021 2 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said: 16 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: Maybe so, but one of the most vocal ones from Loch Fynne was pro Leave. Also do they have input into the SFF? Wasn't that the Oyster farming operation run by the Duke out of Inverary ? No the Loch Fynne guy was on TV and YouTube and someone recently posted something from the referendum showing his support. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted January 18, 2021 Author Share Posted January 18, 2021 No the Loch Fynne guy was on TV and YouTube and someone recently posted something from the referendum showing his support.He was asked on the Twitter feed of one of his vids how he voted. He said he didn't vote. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anonapersona Posted January 18, 2021 Share Posted January 18, 2021 1 hour ago, John Lambies Doos said: 1 hour ago, Granny Danger said: No the Loch Fynne guy was on TV and YouTube and someone recently posted something from the referendum showing his support. He was asked on the Twitter feed of one of his vids how he voted. He said he didn't vote. Not voting makes him just as culpable. It's a vote against Brexit that didn't happen because he's selfish. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted January 19, 2021 Author Share Posted January 19, 2021 Not voting makes him just as culpable. It's a vote against Brexit that didn't happen because he's shellfishFtfySent from my VFD 710 using Pie and Bovril mobile app 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnoustie Young Guvnor Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 On 15/01/2021 at 01:47, Carnoustie Young Guvnor said: Yeah. What's coming is a low tax, low wage, deregulated dystopia, virtually vanishing of the middle class and a two tier society. Those in the bottom tier, which will be about 80% of people, will be increasingly unhealthy, life expectancy for them will decrease (in the last ten years under the Tories for the first time in modern history life expectancy has gone down) and they will have increasingly poor levels of education and things like foreign holidays will once more become something only the rich do. We will be using all sorts of chemicals and pesticides banned by the EU as they are harmful, our media will become increasingly right-wing, we will be fracking and embracing nuclear power and nuclear weapons. All this will be masked by a mixture of propaganda, an increasingly stupid and docile population who are too busy and tired from their 60 hour work week for a pittance to even understand what is being done to them let alone resist it and a rampant overt aggressive nationalism will become the dominant political paradigm. Our NHS will be sold off bit by bit, by stealth and piecemeal, hollowed out to the point its just a basic service, and anything else not nailed down will be sold off too. Tertiary education will go from the position it is now ie the norm to the pursuit of only the elite and wealthy. This is what we have to look forward to now, after we get over the two hundred thousand Covid deaths and the worst economic damage of any developed country. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnoustie Young Guvnor Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 1 minute ago, MixuFruit said: elsewhere: Saw that before. Would normally support that but don't see how it gives us a competitive advantage. What is really a bigger deal is getting corporations to pay the tax they are due in the first place. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 17 minutes ago, MixuFruit said: Britain for all its faults ranks exceptionally high on ease of doing business, so I suppose he's saying all the marginal gains to be had from that are going to weigh more on companies decisions to set up here than having to pay a bit more corporation tax. As you say they can generally wiggle out of it if they're big enough, but that's not the case for SMEs which I think he is thinking about when saying that here. Tell you what, you could justify all sorts of skulduggery and exploitation under that umbrella. We're already anybody's for a seven-figure donation to the Tories - another four years of this shite and we absolutely will be the Caymans' meteorologically-challenged equivalent. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 12 minutes ago, Carnoustie Young Guvnor said: Saw that before. Would normally support that but don't see how it gives us a competitive advantage. What is really a bigger deal is getting corporations to pay the tax they are due in the first place. 8 minutes ago, MixuFruit said: Britain for all its faults ranks exceptionally high on ease of doing business, so I suppose he's saying all the marginal gains to be had from that are going to weigh more on companies decisions to set up here than having to pay a bit more corporation tax. As you say they can generally wiggle out of it if they're big enough, but that's not the case for SMEs which I think he is thinking about when saying that here. All the literature about multinationals and their tax preferences suggests that they look for stability and predictability more than the headline rate. The headline rate still matters but 1% or 2% won't make much difference. This government already showed its capricious nature by cancelling a planned cut at the last minute. I should imagine that, even though it wasn't tax, the proposal to ignore an international agreement would have caused a lot of concern. There are lots of uk rules that international structures rely on (no tax on dividends or most share disposals + some lax rules on overseas income). These shambolic jokers can't be relied on to leave these alone or even give suitable notice of any change. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee-Bey Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 8 minutes ago, Henderson to deliver ..... said: To be fair to the Eton mess, he only extended that offer to manufacturers, not fish exporters. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTG Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 He's also a poundshop Delboy lying c**t. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 52 minutes ago, MixuFruit said: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jan/19/uk-ministers-gain-power-to-allow-lower-standard-food-imports And so it begins... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 This somehow isn't a Private Eye spoof arricle 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bendan Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 20 hours ago, coprolite said: All the literature about multinationals and their tax preferences suggests that they look for stability and predictability more than the headline rate. The headline rate still matters but 1% or 2% won't make much difference. This government already showed its capricious nature by cancelling a planned cut at the last minute. I should imagine that, even though it wasn't tax, the proposal to ignore an international agreement would have caused a lot of concern. There are lots of uk rules that international structures rely on (no tax on dividends or most share disposals + some lax rules on overseas income). These shambolic jokers can't be relied on to leave these alone or even give suitable notice of any change. I think this the very much underestimated impact of Brexit - it's just about the worst PR exercise for a country you could possibly have come up with, and its been going on for years now. Irrespective of any of the issues involved, we look like stupid, racist c***s to most of the world. And even now, our government hasn't started any effort to repair that damage. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.