kiddy Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 Stilll suspended. The gift that keeps on giving! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 1 hour ago, doulikefish said: Joey getting payed off and contract terminated im hearing Did you hear it from Wasps1? ITK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 1 minute ago, Rugster said: Did you hear it from Wasps1? ITK Nope usually from a decent source,he isnt wrong on many things in the goings on of the scottish football world Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 1 hour ago, doulikefish said: Nope usually from a decent source,he isnt wrong on many things in the goings on of the scottish football world It's wisbit, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 1 minute ago, bennett said: It's wisbit, isn't it? Na magee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 Just now, doulikefish said: Na magee You'll need to back and edit in some tales of phone catching and depression curing then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiddy Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 They haven't the cash to pay him off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 That moment when the shit hits the fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 When did he hit a fan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 Up there, that's the massive c**t we've made of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wren Road Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 Barton sacked!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lionel hutz Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 Barton sacked!!! Naw he hasnae? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wren Road Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 Naw he hasnae? Just getting in first before the inevitable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 Hopefully the club are holding out for the SFA investigations into his match betting to go against him, he can then be sacked without a pay off! Clutching at straws perhaps but that would be the ideal outcome for Rangers and Joseph to head their separate ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 6 minutes ago, RedRob72 said: Hopefully the club are holding out for the SFA investigations into his match betting to go against him, he can then be sacked without a pay off! Clutching at straws perhaps but that would be the ideal outcome for Rangers and Joseph to head their separate ways. Surely that still wouldn't constitute the gross misconduct that would enable Rangers to simply sack him. The fact that Rangers did not take that action against other players found guilty of worse betting offences, would be significant here, would it not? I'd imagine it's more likely that if Rangers hold out for longer, they're hopeful that Barton will feel forced to settle for a smallish pay-off in fear that if he lingers further yet, his career will just slip out of sight altogether. Given his age, time is not on the player's side in this one, unless he's prepared to simply retire for what he feels he's due. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 1 minute ago, Monkey Tennis said: Surely that still wouldn't constitute the gross misconduct that would enable Rangers to simply sack him. The fact that Rangers did not take that action against other players found guilty of worse betting offences, would be significant here, would it not? I'd imagine it's more likely that if Rangers hold out for longer, they're hopeful that Barton will feel forced to settle for a smallish pay-off in fear that if he lingers further yet, his career will just slip out of sight altogether. Given his age, time is not on the player's side in this one, unless he's prepared to simply retire for what he feels he's due. More likely behind the scenes they've found someone (Cough, Burnley) to take him off their hands in January and are just keeping him suspended until then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aDONisSheep Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 3 hours ago, RedRob72 said: Hopefully the club are holding out for the SFA investigations into his match betting to go against him, he can then be sacked without a pay off! Clutching at straws perhaps but that would be the ideal outcome for Rangers and Joseph to head their separate ways. The club, the CLUB! Where have you been?! You're getting confused. It's the company that enters into contracts. Fix your post and we'll say no more about it. It'll be our little secret. Yours, ever helpfully. aDONis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zidane's child Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 4 hours ago, Rugster said: More likely behind the scenes they've found someone (Cough, Burnley) to take him off their hands in January and are just keeping him suspended until then. Yeah but he'd still be under contract. Why would Burnley pay a fee for him when they picked him up on a free transfer a season or two ago? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Skidmarks Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 Yeah but he'd still be under contract. Why would Burnley pay a fee for him when they picked him up on a free transfer a season or two ago? I'm sure they offered him a contract for this season but he turned it down due to the 20k a week* Rangers were offering.*come at me Bennett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 8 minutes ago, zidane's child said: Yeah but he'd still be under contract. Why would Burnley pay a fee for him when they picked him up on a free transfer a season or two ago? Maybe The Rangers are happy to cut their losses and let him go for free to get him off the wage bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.