Helpma Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Ya wee beauty! Get tore intae thae red b....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandarilla Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 You couldn't pick better timing for both goals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kebab Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Two goal hatrick!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twinkle Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Ref has fuckin shat that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtie23 Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Lingard should have walked. That was blatant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resk Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Ref acting under sponsor's orders there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kebab Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Lingard is a bawbag!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandarilla Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Ref has fuckin shat that Lingard should have walked. That was blatant This is what really fucking gets me. How on earth will we ever reduce diving when the refs don't give fouls, bookings, penalties whatever - when the player stays on his feet? Clear yellow card. And basically shows everyone that you should be going down in all instances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helpma Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 3 minutes ago, Twinkle said: Ref has fuckin shat that Well, it's a judgement call - we criticise refs for showing too many cards, he (presumably) told Lingard that he got away with that because the Southampton player didn't go down, but if he tries it again he gets a card. Good refereeing IMO. Also, "the Southampton player"? Who do I think I am, Pat fuckin' Bonner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtie23 Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Well, it's a judgement call - we criticise refs for showing too many cards, he (presumably) told Lingard that he go away with that because the Southampton player didn't go down, but if he tries it again he gets a card. Good refereeing IMO. Also, "the Southampton player"? Who do I think I am, Pat fuckin' Bonner? So if he went down you reckon he would have got a yellow? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helpma Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Just now, lichtie23 said: So if he went down you reckon he would have got a yellow? Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandarilla Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Yes Then how is it good refereeing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Well, it's a judgement call - we criticise refs for showing too many cards, he (presumably) told Lingard that he go away with that because the Southampton player didn't go down, but if he tries it again he gets a card. Good refereeing IMO. Also, "the Southampton player"? Who do I think I am, Pat fuckin' Bonner? If he's told him that, he should be sacked. That's not the rule.And not everyone moans about too many cards. That whinging is the preserve of British commentators stuck in the 1970s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtie23 Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Yes You've made a bit of a mess of this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twinkle Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 That c**t Marriner was quick enough in his pocket for Redmonds yellow there, p***k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtie23 Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 That c**t Marriner was quick enough in his pocket for Redmonds yellow there, p***k TBF.....that was a definite yellow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twinkle Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 TBF.....that was a definite yellow Im not suggesting it wasnt, just looking for a bit of consistency Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helpma Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Just now, pandarilla said: Then how is it good refereeing? Because are rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools. If yellow cards are given out for every foul, then the game is ruined - there has to be some leeway. I think the referee showed good judgement and didn't turn a minor incident into a game defining one. By the letter of the law, he should have been booked, But it's a hell of a world we live in where the letter of the law rules over balanced judgement. I might have a different opinion on Saturday at Ibrox, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diamond_for_life Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Can't hear the commentary due to being in the pub. Has Mata taken a knock or is Mourinho keeping up the dickhead patter in the treatment of him ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandarilla Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Because are rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools. If yellow cards are given out for every foul, then the game is ruined - there has to be some leeway. I think the referee showed good judgement and didn't turn a minor incident into a game defining one. By the letter of the law, he should have been booked, But it's a hell of a world we live in where the letter of the law rules over balanced judgement. I might have a different opinion on Saturday at Ibrox, though. Would you want your player to go down then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.