Detournement Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 Doing the debate with Covid is the Presidential equivalent of going to work straight from a party. It's that kind of vitality that's going to bring him back in 2024. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugbypark Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 Rittenhouse was found not guilty because he was.. not guilty. He defended himself, which he had every right to do.He travelled twenty miles to defend himself? No, he’s an brainwashed racist, like half of his country. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 Supreme Court Justice’s appointed by an ignorant narcissistic arsehole who should never have been close to real power are about to put reproductive rights for women in the U.S. back decades. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 39 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: Supreme Court Justice’s appointed by an ignorant narcissistic arsehole who should never have been close to real power are about to put reproductive rights for women in the U.S. back decades. It's been coming for a lot longer than Trump's term, though. Bit bizarre that this will be one of his big legacy achievements, considering that there's no way he gives a single solitary f**k about abortion. It's just another thing he used to galvanise support. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Steiner Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 On 02/12/2021 at 15:55, Rugbypark said: He travelled twenty miles to defend himself? No, he’s an brainwashed racist, like half of his country. Obviously he didn't travel twenty miles to defend himself, but found himself in a position where he had to defend himself once he got there. Seems like you're the brainwashed one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Steiner Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 On 02/12/2021 at 16:22, Granny Danger said: Supreme Court Justice’s appointed by an ignorant narcissistic arsehole who should never have been close to real power are about to put reproductive rights for women in the U.S. back decades. 'Reproductive rights' despite the fact that reproduction has already taken before the abortion happens. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genuine Hibs Fan Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 Wrestling fans are second only to heavy metal fans in being able to safely write off as OFTW with no other knowledge (sorry @NotThePars) 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottsdad Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 13 minutes ago, Scott Steiner said: 'Reproductive rights' despite the fact that reproduction has already taken before the abortion happens. There are biology classes at night schools and colleges all round the country I can recommend to you, to stop you accidentally spouting nonsense like this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 There are biology classes at night schools and colleges all round the country I can recommend to you, to stop you accidentally spouting nonsense like this. It's not accidental. It's desperate attention-seeking [emoji23] 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 23 minutes ago, Scott Steiner said: 'Reproductive rights' despite the fact that reproduction has already taken before the abortion happens. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Steiner Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 (edited) 15 minutes ago, scottsdad said: There are biology classes at night schools and colleges all round the country I can recommend to you, to stop you accidentally spouting nonsense like this. No need. If you want to refute it with logic and reason then that'll do fine. The same challenge goes to Welshbairn too. Something tells me you won't. More likely to get a handmaids tale reference Edited December 3, 2021 by Scott Steiner 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakedee Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 Obviously he didn't travel twenty miles to defend himself, but found himself in a position where he had to defend himself once he got there. Seems like you're the brainwashed one.Is this a serious comment? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Steiner Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 2 minutes ago, jakedee said: 39 minutes ago, Scott Steiner said: Obviously he didn't travel twenty miles to defend himself, but found himself in a position where he had to defend himself once he got there. Seems like you're the brainwashed one. Is this a serious comment? Why wouldn't it be? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakedee Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 Why wouldn't it be?Are you suggesting that someone who travelled 20 miles, with an automatic assault weapon only had it "just in case he had to defend himself"He went there for one reason, and defending himself wasn't it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Steiner Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 1 minute ago, jakedee said: Are you suggesting that someone who travelled 20 miles, with an automatic assault weapon only had it "just in case he had to defend himself" He went there for one reason, and defending himself wasn't it. He didn't. Looks like you've been taken in by the media nonsense buddy. There's a reason he's probably going to sue CNN and the likes ye' know, the same way Nick Sandmann did after the dreadful reporting of the Covington Kids incident. 6 Myths Surrounding the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Debunked (insider.com) "Myth: Kyle Rittenhouse illegally brought a gun across state lines Perhaps the most persistent myth surrounding the case is the idea that Rittenhouse, then 17, brought an AR-15 across state lines. Rittenhouse lived about 20 minutes outside of Kenosha, in Antioch, Illinois. His Illinois residence helped spur rumors that the teenager traveled to Wisconsin with his rifle illegally in tow. But during his trial, Rittenhouse testified in court that he drove himself from his home in Illinois to Kenosha on August 24, 2020, the day before he fatally shot two men. The gun was already being stored at a friend's house in Kenosha, according to police records and court testimony. " 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 2 minutes ago, Scott Steiner said: The gun was already being stored at a friend's house in Kenosha, according to police records and court testimony. Bought illegally for him when he was underage. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Steiner Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 1 minute ago, welshbairn said: Bought illegally for him when he was underage. I now draw your attention to the 2nd myth on the same link. It's almost like you guys are deliberately doing this in order! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakedee Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 He didn't. Looks like you've been taken in by the media nonsense buddy. There's a reason he's probably going to sue CNN and the likes ye' know, the same way Nick Sandmann did after the dreadful reporting of the Covington Kids incident. 6 Myths Surrounding the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Debunked (insider.com) "Myth: Kyle Rittenhouse illegally brought a gun across state lines Perhaps the most persistent myth surrounding the case is the idea that Rittenhouse, then 17, brought an AR-15 across state lines. Rittenhouse lived about 20 minutes outside of Kenosha, in Antioch, Illinois. His Illinois residence helped spur rumors that the teenager traveled to Wisconsin with his rifle illegally in tow. But during his trial, Rittenhouse testified in court that he drove himself from his home in Illinois to Kenosha on August 24, 2020, the day before he fatally shot two men. The gun was already being stored at a friend's house in Kenosha, according to police records and court testimony. "Handy that he had to defend himself just outside his friends house and that it happened to have an an automatic weapon stored there.He's a lucky lad. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 (edited) No, you all don't understand. He went to his friend's house, and as a HUGE black lives matter supporter wanted to join the demo, but brought his AR15 along in case anyone got a bit rowdy, just to keep everyone safe. Whether he fantasised about killing people with it (as documented) is irrelevant. Edited December 3, 2021 by welshbairn 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Steiner Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 1 minute ago, jakedee said: Handy that he had to defend himself just outside his friends house and that it happened to have an an automatic weapon stored there. He's a lucky lad. Of course that was handy, but I'm sure they planned it. He had his gun for self defense, and it's just as well he did considering the attack on him that the footage clearly shows. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.