Jump to content

The Official Former President Trump thread


banana

Recommended Posts

https://twitter.com/StormyDaniels/status/1032048646689378304

Incidentally I don't think they'll get him on the illegal campaign contributions. After he got away with #grabtheirpussiesgate he could just say it was nothing to do with the election, he just didn't want Milanda loaf finding out. I doubt very much it would have affected the election anyway, his supporters don't care, even the evangelicals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The scenario if Trump panics, fires Mueller and tries to get the evidence shredded. I don't think the dems and liberals are taking into account that the trumpets might have some plans of their own. Could be an utter shitfest.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/case-mueller-firing-break-glass-democrats-prep-emergency-plan-n902526?cid=eml_nbn_20180822

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bandstand said:

They are federal offences too

He could be liable to State charges too, but what happens when you have a President who totally ignores the conventions of power relationships that haven't been tested in the courts? The law has been flexible until now to allow a stable President freedom of action in a crisis, don't think the Founding Fathers or the Supreme Court had any consideration of what might happen if a narcissistic reality TV entertainer got in power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LockHerUp4Life.com is obviously a money making scam rather than genuine right wing idiocy.
The midterms are going to be great for astroturfing, sock puppets, false flags and claims of bias on social media. A massively entertaining shitshow.


There’s already more senior Republicans acknowledging Q-anon. What a country.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

He could be liable to State charges too, but what happens when you have a President who totally ignores the conventions of power relationships that haven't been tested in the courts? The law has been flexible until now to allow a stable President freedom of action in a crisis, don't think the Founding Fathers or the Supreme Court had any consideration of what might happen if a narcissistic reality TV entertainer got in power.

They Founders didn't envisage political parties or a politicized Supreme Court either

Its plausible that Trump has nominated for the court the guy that will be responsible for getting him off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, welshbairn said:

https://twitter.com/StormyDaniels/status/1032048646689378304

Incidentally I don't think they'll get him on the illegal campaign contributions. After he got away with #grabtheirpussiesgate he could just say it was nothing to do with the election, he just didn't want Milanda loaf finding out. I doubt very much it would have affected the election anyway, his supporters don't care, even the evangelicals.

Aye getting his lawyer to pay off porn stars can be argued as standard practice rather than campaign related.

Did Trump pay the bill from Cohen personally or was it the campaign?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Detournement said:

Aye getting his lawyer to pay off porn stars can be argued as standard practice rather than campaign related.

Did Trump pay the bill from Cohen personally or was it the campaign?

There is a tape of them discussing it

And the fact it the payments were made months before an election is more than enough evidence to make the case that it was intended to influence the outcome

 

Just ask John Edwards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bandstand said:

There is a tape of them discussing it

And the fact it the payments were made months before an election is more than enough evidence to make the case that it was intended to influence the outcome

 

Just ask John Edwards

Aye but why would that be illegal? The argument would surely need to be that it came from a undeclared source ie not the official campaign or a registered super pac.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a tape of them discussing it
And the fact it the payments were made months before an election is more than enough evidence to make the case that it was intended to influence the outcome
 
Just ask John Edwards


Jedwards?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Detournement said:

Aye but why would that be illegal? The argument would surely need to be that it came from a undeclared source ie not the official campaign or a registered super pac.

 

Because it is then classified as a campaign contribution 

Michael Cohen has just pleaded guilty to two counts of illegal campaign contributions because of the pay offs he made for Trump

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bandstand said:

Because it is then classified as a campaign contribution 

Michael Cohen has just pleaded guilty to two counts of illegal campaign contributions because of the pay offs he made for Trump

Aye but i've read that he then billed it someone but it's not clear if that was to Trump or the campaign.

Edit - Trump paid it himself. It was disclosed in May.

 

Edited by Detournement
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

Sanders says the president “did nothing wrong”.

“Just because Michael Cohen made a plea deal doesn’t mean that implicates the president in anything,” she adds, after Cohen implicated the president in his plea deal.

 

And

 

Quote

Here’s Trump’s response in full to a question about hush payments during the Fox & Friends interview.

Fox & Friends co-host Ainsley Earhardt: “Did you know about the payments?”

Trump: “Later on I knew. Later on. But you have to understand, Ainsley, what he did -- and they weren’t taken out of campaign finance, that’s the big thing. That’s a much bigger thing. Did they come out of the campaign? They didn’t come out of the campaign, they came from me. And I tweeted about it. You know, I put -- I don’t know if you know but I tweeted about the payments. But they didn’t come out of campaign. In fact, my first question when I heard about it was did they come out of the campaign because that could be a little dicey. And they didn’t come out of the campaign and that’s big. But they weren’t – that’s not a – it’s not even a campaign violation. If you look at President Obama, he had a massive campaign violation but he had a different attorney general and they viewed it a lot differently.”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/news-blog/live/2018/aug/22/trump-turmoil-aftermath-cohen-manafort-verdicts-live

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bob Mahelp
16 hours ago, welshbairn said:

The scenario if Trump panics, fires Mueller and tries to get the evidence shredded. I don't think the dems and liberals are taking into account that the trumpets might have some plans of their own. Could be an utter shitfest.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/case-mueller-firing-break-glass-democrats-prep-emergency-plan-n902526?cid=eml_nbn_20180822

'I could run the investigation if I want', says Trump.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...