hehawhehaw Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 14 minutes ago, Antlion said: Ask me to reproduce what, you barely-literate shitgibbon? well you twat i've asked about the internet law. I'm no gonny let go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DublinMagyar Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 She was 28, a qualified nurse with a degree in chemical engineering. Question to others...is this the sort of dross posters on these threads face regularly? Yes is the simple answer. 2/3 in particular, I'm sure you can work out who.( awaits hilariously well constructed riposte from...........) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 10 minutes ago, Antlion said: I saw you gave up trying to defend or excuse your British nationalism in our last exchange I saw you ignored my well worked thesis that one is not guilty by dint of accusation. Not that I expect you to grasp this simple point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hehawhehaw Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 19 minutes ago, hehawhehaw said: She sounds like a vulnerable wee lassie to me, regardless of her age you took advantage of her circumstances. You b*****d. I don't expect to hear from you again you arrogant b*****d. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 1 minute ago, hehawhehaw said: I don't expect to hear from you again you arrogant b*****d. When has 'arrogant b*****d' ever been seen as a bad thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 8 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: I saw you ignored my well worked thesis that one is not guilty by dint of accusation. Not that I expect you to grasp this simple point. To which I replied that you were not guilty by accusation but by confession. You proudly volunteered yourself as "a Tory". I pointed out that the Tories are a British nationalist party, whose own website advertises their British nationalist credentials. Naturally your response was to ignore that entirely, as apparently things you don't like just can't be true. People aren't "ignoring" your posts just because you're too slow to comprehend (or even bother reading) their responses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hehawhehaw Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 3 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: When has 'arrogant b*****d' ever been seen as a bad thing? You talk down your nose at everybody, but you make no relevant point. There may be enough proof on here to prove you took advantage of a vulnerable wee lassie. That's arrogant. hope the polis look at this evidence. You talk your way out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Just now, Antlion said: To which I replied that you were not guilty by accusation but by confession. You proudly volunteered yourself as "a Tory". I pointed out that the Tories are a British nationalist party, whose own website advertises their British nationalist credentials. Naturally your response was to ignore that entirely, as apparently things you don't like just can't be true. Spray 'Brit Nat' around all you like, chap. Repeating lies don't make them true. Sake, you're like the brain-dead Sellick fans.....wait. You are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 1 minute ago, hehawhehaw said: You talk down your nose at everybody I have no doubt you're able to justify this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DublinMagyar Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Well this has escalated quickly[emoji33] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Just now, The_Kincardine said: Spray 'Brit Nat' around all you like, chap. Repeating lies don't make them true. Sake, you're like the brain-dead Sellick fans.....wait. You are. My quotations were from your party's own website. If you think your party is lying to the public, take it up with them at the next meeting of the branch office (unless of course you're busy dragging your knuckles around outside your new team's HQ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hehawhehaw Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 1 minute ago, The_Kincardine said: I have no doubt you're able to justify this. Ask your fellow posters? What about taking advantage of the wee lassie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hehawhehaw Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 1 hour ago, DublinMagyar said: You are not capable of comprehending even the simplest of concepts as you have so beautifully illustrated earlier. Why on earth would I engage with you in such a complex subject as international economics where even the true experts are in such disagreement? I'd be wasting my time (and yours). I'll willingly get back to you when you begin to show signs of intelligent reasoning, even if I disagree with you. Maybe cut out the xenophobic shite too , you are only harming your cause. Remittances is not a complex subject. Keep digging. What is complex about remittances DM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McSpreader Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 31 minutes ago, Antlion said: To which I replied that you were not guilty by accusation but by confession. You proudly volunteered yourself as "a Tory". I pointed out that the Tories are a British nationalist party, whose own website advertises their British nationalist credentials. Naturally your response was to ignore that entirely, as apparently things you don't like just can't be true. People aren't "ignoring" your posts just because you're too slow to comprehend (or even bother reading) their responses. I'm guilty by confession but am open to any viable alternatives.......yet to find one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DublinMagyar Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 You're quite correct, remittances in isolation are a a fairly simple subject it's just that the posts you are referring to discussed the effect they can have on inter-national (not international) economies, a highly complex subject. Your inability to see beyond the simple to the deeper , root cause analysis and understanding of why economies succeed or fail, in no way comes as a shock to me nor, I suspect, to many of the people who follow any of the forums that you regularly stink out with your foreigner hating invective. In short, you keep on demonstrating your inability to grasp simple concepts clearly and...................You know what? It's pointless, you're pointless, we're both wasting our time here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loondave1 Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 It's Antlion who is seething. Anyone who disagrees with his narrow Euro-nationalism or the SNP's propaganda is labelled a British nationalist. He's not the only offender - just read the hateful nonsense posted by Peppino, Cream Cheese etc. Agreed.I blame these people for goading me in to posting border line troll statements.A lot to answer for these people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loondave1 Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 the internet law you referred to ya stupid twatt. Naw.I meant reproduce in the biblical sense.Literally replicate himself.Actually i suspect Antlion is a cunning Unionist plot to drive people into the NO camp.Making the same old "Britnat" "Britnationalist" posts over and over like Antlion bingo."Britnat !"......"House !!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaffenThinMint Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 2 hours ago, Glen Sannox said: Because they reek of cringe. Twenty one posts & two hours later & no one has performed the statutory reply? Very well then: Glenminter Next time do it yourselves you lazy b*****ds... grumble... place going to the dogs ... mutter ... never have had this in Reynard & RRG's days ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 A wee early present for Loondave, given his "pathetic attention seeker" one must have faded in the wash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loondave1 Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 A wee early present for Loondave, given his "pathetic attention seeker" one must have faded in the wash. You love it.Your life would be worthless without us "Yoons" to rail at.We say "SNPBaad" and you jump that's how it is . You're our "bitch" now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.