itzdrk Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 On 19/05/2024 at 09:44, RiG said: @ICTChris said this recently to me, and possibly on here, but it does seem Ferguson acts like a youth coach where the style / approach is more important than the results. Quite astonishing given that the style is abysmal in itself. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itzdrk Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 On 20/05/2024 at 14:28, TheScarf said: She was told there wasn't a job for her when she came back from maternity leave. Is that not illegal? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SandyCromarty Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 36 minutes ago, CityDave94 said: Reading through on CTO that our future might be another merger, this time with County when there is no more of MacGregor's money. That was on the thread started by Dougal. That'll be the same anti merger Dougal, there's only a few of them left, he'll be on the gloat right now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizzo Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 38 minutes ago, realmadrid said: yes he was at Dundee but was sacked in 2012 having fallen out with the shirt sponsor and had no sponsor in place at the start of the season Then he was at Hearts and got sacked as he was in charge of the new stand build...... and forgot to order the seats. He was in Inverness by 2019 and spent a lot of time on Sportsound arguing the way that would be best for Rangers not ICT at the time. Sounds like a great guy to have in your corner. Better days will come for Caley I'm sure. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CityDave94 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 7 minutes ago, SandyCromarty said: That'll be the same anti merger Dougal, there's only a few of them left, he'll be on the gloat right now. Imagine waiting 30 years for this. At least our club has outlived their big club. Nothing can surpass that, nothing at all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScarf Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 15 minutes ago, itzdrk said: Is that not illegal? Not if they made whatever post she held redundant. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Central Belt Caley Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 All that time and an utter nothing statement. Get these jokers out 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB1994 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 The only positive thing out of that is that if we are staying full time then Administration must be out of the question? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScarf Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 A statement saying absolutely fuck all. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 6 minutes ago, Central Belt Caley said: All that time and an utter nothing statement. Get these jokers out Head in the sand vibes in this statement. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raith Against The Machine Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 2 minutes ago, PB1994 said: The only positive thing out of that is that if we are staying full time then Administration must be out of the question? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaspianChris Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrie Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 I assume if they want to stay full time it'll be a "we have to go up at the first attempt" job. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiG Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 Staying full time is good (f'ck knows how we're doing that) but the restructuring has to include binning off Ferguson or Gardiner. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB1994 Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 4 minutes ago, Comrie said: I assume if they want to stay full time it'll be a "we have to go up at the first attempt" job. Yeah, very much so and if they decide to keep Ferguson and Gardiner on the books it won’t happen. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanetti Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 That feels like the kind of thing that should've been shared by Sunday at the latest as a holding statement while they prepared a real update. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Central Belt Caley Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 That’s the type of statement I’d have expected on Saturday night or Sunday morning. Not 3 days later 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranaldo Bairn Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 Doesn't read like an "admin is imminent" type statement, at least. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 So the ‘backers’ have clearly agreed to another bail out or to write off previous bail outs. This is how the club has been run since we got relegated in 2017 and it’s not exactly worked. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Blue Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 (edited) Taking the positives out of that statement ... you'll still be FT next season, with the implication that the club will still be in business. A wee word of caution though, staying FT isn't everything (QOS are still FT in L1 going into our third season down there) - it also very much depends on: (1) the size of the FT budget, and (2) who manages that budget (ie does the recruiting/coaching/team selection) ... as we've found out to our peril. PS - a certain M Bartley is available for future work, kens how to manage a limited budget, just sayin' ... Edited May 21 by Otis Blue 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.