peasy23 Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 The principal reason for the restructuring was to create larger divisions so that clubs had a greater number of guaranteed home fixtures. Most worryingly, the Ayrshire division had been reduced to 11 clubs , giving only 10 home fixtures, which was not providing enough income to survive on.IIRC did the proposal not originally come from St. Anthony's, and it did mention the fact that Central clubs could drop 2 levels away from the Super First, while the Ayrshire clubs could only ever drop 1 level from there? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedEd Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 5 minutes ago, peasy23 said: 11 minutes ago, archieb said: The principal reason for the restructuring was to create larger divisions so that clubs had a greater number of guaranteed home fixtures. Most worryingly, the Ayrshire division had been reduced to 11 clubs , giving only 10 home fixtures, which was not providing enough income to survive on. IIRC did the proposal not originally come from St. Anthony's, and it did mention the fact that Central clubs could drop 2 levels away from the Super First, while the Ayrshire clubs could only ever drop 1 level from there? I think Whitletts were very active in pushing the proposal. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasy23 Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 I think Whitletts were very active in pushing the proposal.Think they were, there were at least 2 proposals from what I remember, with the club's involved being asked to join together and they then came up with the one that was adopted. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedEd Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 2 hours ago, honestman54 said: Just checked their website and they also include a great visual pyramid there with logos and the number of matches played each season by different parts of the pyramid. The graphic is very helpful, particularly for folk who don't know much about the non-league structure in Scotland. They've got the number of teams /games in the Highland and EoS wrong. Minor thing though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyramidic Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 (edited) The current list of 39 clubs that propose to join the WoSFL: 1. Clydebank (SJFA West Region Premiership) 2. Kilwinning Rangers (SJFA West Region Premiership) 3. Rutherglen Glencairn (SJFA West Region Premiership) 4. Bellshill Athletic (SJFA West League One) 5. Drumchapel United (Central Scottish Amateur Premier Division) 6. Neilston Juniors (SJFA West Region Championship) 7. Maryhill (SJFA West League One) 8. Kello Rovers (SJFA West League One) 9. Blantyre Victoria (SJFA West Region Championship) 10. Kirkintilloch Rob Roy (SJFA West Region Premiership) 11. Vale of Clyde (SJFA West League Two) 12. Renfrew (SJFA West Region Championship) 13. Royal Albert (SJFA West League One) 14. Arthurlie (SJFA West Region Championship) 15. Newmains United (SJFA West League Two) 16. Kilsyth Rangers (SJFA West Region Championship) 17. Whitletts Victoria (SJFA West Region Championship) 18. Gartcairn Juniors (SJFA West Region Championship) 19. Cambuslang Rangers (SJFA West Region Championship) 20. Cumbernauld United (SJFA West Region Championship) 21. Glasgow Perthshire (SJFA West League One) 22. Ashfield (SJFA West League Two) 23. Petershill (SJFA West Region Championship) 24. Greenock Juniors (SJFA West League One) 25. Larkhall Thistle (SJFA West League One) 26. Port Glasgow Juniors (SJFA West League One) 27. Pollok (SJFA West Region Premiership) 28. Darvel Juniors (SJFA West Region Championship) 29. Vale of Leven (SJFA West League Two) 30. Glenafton Athletic (SJFA West Region Premiership) 31. Johnstone Burgh (SJFA West League Two) 32. Auchinleck Talbot (SJFA West Region Premiership) 33. Largs Thistle (SJFA West Region Premiership) 34. Kilbirnie Ladeside (SJFA West Region Premiership) 35. Troon (SJFA West Region Premiership) 36. Irvine Meadow XI (SJFA West Region Premiership) 37. Beith Juniors (SJFA West Region Premiership) 38. Shotts Bon Accord (SJFA West Region Championship) 39. Forth Wanderers (SJFA West League Two) SJFA West Region Premiership (12 clubs) Auchinleck Talbot; Beith Juniors; Benburb; Clydebank; Cumnock Juniors; Glenafton Athletic; Hurlford United; Irvine Meadow; Kilbirnie Ladeside; Kilwinning Rangers; Kirkintilloch Rob Roy; Largs Thistle; Pollok; Rossvale; Rutherglen Glencairn; Troon SJFA West Region Championship (12 clubs) Arthurlie; Blantyre Victoria; Cambuslang Rangers; Craigmark Burntonians; Cumbernauld United; Dalry Thistle; Darvel Juniors; Gartcairn Juniors; Irvine Victoria; Kilsyth Rangers; Neilston Juniors; Petershill; Renfrew; Shotts Bon Accord; St Roch's; Whitletts Victoria SJFA West Region League One (8 clubs) Ardrossan Winton Rovers; Bellshill Athletic; Carluke Rovers; East Kilbride Thistle; Girvan; Glasgow Perthshire; Greenock Juniors; Kello Rovers; Lanark United; Larkhall Thistle; Lesmahagow; Maryhill; Port Glasgow; Royal Albert; Shettleston; Wishaw Juniors SJFA West Region League Two (6 clubs) Annbank United; Ardeer Thistle; Ashfield; Forth Wanderers; Johnstone Burgh; Lugar Boswell Thistle; Maybole Juniors; Muirkirk Juniors; Newmains United; Saltcoats Victoria; St Anthony's; Thorniewood United; Vale of Clyde; Vale of Leven; Yoker Athletic South of Scotland League (0 clubs) Abbey Vale; Bonnyton Thistle; Caledonian Braves Res; Creetown; Heston Rovers; Lochar Thistle; Lochmaben; Mid-Annandale; Newton Stewart; Nithsdale Wanderers; St Cuthbert Wanderers; Stranraer Res; Threave Rovers; Upper Annandale; Wigtown & Bladnoch Amateurs (1 club) Drumchapel United PYM; Glasgow University; Oban Saints; Strathclyde University More applicants to follow to be added to the growing list! Awaiting official announcement from Kilbirnie Ladeside. Edited March 30, 2020 by Pyramidic 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacGafraidh Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 And now Forth Wanderers 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanner Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 That this pish sorted out now? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunrise Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 Has JuniorFitbaSC said anything? They've blocked the Largs Thistle account again. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyramidic Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archieb Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 36 minutes ago, peasy23 said: 42 minutes ago, archieb said: The principal reason for the restructuring was to create larger divisions so that clubs had a greater number of guaranteed home fixtures. Most worryingly, the Ayrshire division had been reduced to 11 clubs , giving only 10 home fixtures, which was not providing enough income to survive on. IIRC did the proposal not originally come from St. Anthony's, and it did mention the fact that Central clubs could drop 2 levels away from the Super First, while the Ayrshire clubs could only ever drop 1 level from there? 29 minutes ago, RedEd said: I think Whitletts were very active in pushing the proposal. 25 minutes ago, peasy23 said: 29 minutes ago, RedEd said: I think Whitletts were very active in pushing the proposal. Think they were, there were at least 2 proposals from what I remember, with the club's involved being asked to join together and they then came up with the one that was adopted. It's really not helpful when people who weren't even there try to rewrite history! I've given the correct story before on this thread but, for the sake of clarity, here it is again: What in fact happened was that three clubs independently produced proposals for reconfiguring the league structure. Two sets of proposals were submitted to the WRSJFA for comments (one of which was from Pollok, the other from St Anthony's), the third set from Whitletts Victoria was sent out to all clubs for comment and openly discussed on Pie and Bovril. Feedback from the Region was that Pollok should consult with St Anthony's and agree a joint proposal. I attended a WRSJFA General Meeting as Pollok delegate, and used the opportunity to speak with interested people from several other clubs including Whitletts. Following this, Whitletts convened two meetings of a working group representing all interested clubs plus a few additional ones we invited so that all divisions and geographical areas were involved. There, 5 sets of proposals in all were considered which had many similar features. After discussion, it was a version of the Pollok proposal that met with most approval (with the Premiership, Championship, Leagues 1&2 nomenclature adopted from St Anthony's) and which was taken forward to the next WRSJFA GM, formulated into an AGM motion, (along with 2 other motions, originated by Whitletts and agreed by the group - for advance release of fixtures and changes to the Sectional Cup). 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedEd Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 7 minutes ago, archieb said: It's really not helpful when people who weren't even there try to rewrite history! I've given the correct story before on this thread but, for the sake of clarity, here it is again: What in fact happened was that three clubs independently produced proposals for reconfiguring the league structure. Two sets of proposals were submitted to the WRSJFA for comments (one of which was from Pollok, the other from St Anthony's), the third set from Whitletts Victoria was sent out to all clubs for comment and openly discussed on Pie and Bovril. Feedback from the Region was that Pollok should consult with St Anthony's and agree a joint proposal. I attended a WRSJFA General Meeting as Pollok delegate, and used the opportunity to speak with interested people from several other clubs including Whitletts. Following this, Whitletts convened two meetings of a working group representing all interested clubs plus a few additional ones we invited so that all divisions and geographical areas were involved. There, 5 sets of proposals in all were considered which had many similar features. After discussion, it was a version of the Pollok proposal that met with most approval (with the Premiership, Championship, Leagues 1&2 nomenclature adopted from St Anthony's) and which was taken forward to the next WRSJFA GM, formulated into an AGM motion, (along with 2 other motions, originated by Whitletts and agreed by the group - for advance release of fixtures and changes to the Sectional Cup). Hardly rewriting history. Your account is quite detailed, and confirms that Whitletts were active in the successful attempt to change the league structure. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldie2k19 Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 4 hours ago, Ginaro said: Their pyramid is out of date though - a better representation would be this, assuming everyone moves over to the WOS and 8 clubs join the EOS. 64 wosfl clubs in tier 6 as opposed to 16 in the eosfl? I dont think so. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongTimeLurker Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 Only for 1 season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glensmad Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 64 wosfl clubs in tier 6 as opposed to 16 in the eosfl? I dont think so.That's the reality for next season only. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archieb Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 (edited) 27 minutes ago, RedEd said: Hardly rewriting history. Your account is quite detailed, and confirms that Whitletts were active in the successful attempt to change the league structure. They were indeed instrumental, although the Whitletts proposal originally included a regionalised 3rd level. Hopefully you'll understand my preference for having Pollok's contribution recognised also. Edited March 30, 2020 by archieb 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry Macguire Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 16 minutes ago, Baldie2k19 said: 64 wosfl clubs in tier 6 as opposed to 16 in the eosfl? I dont think so. Not too sure of the relevance of what happens in the EoSL? An established league that went through the same process as the newly formed WoSL is about to go through. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archieb Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 1 hour ago, RedEd said: The graphic is very helpful, particularly for folk who don't know much about the non-league structure in Scotland. They've got the number of teams /games in the Highland and EoS wrong. Minor thing though. They've also got the number of playoff spots in the SPFL Championship, League 1 & League 2 incorrect (should be 3, not 1). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doonhamer1969 Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 Troon's statement is that good,other clubs are quoting it now . 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
honestman54 Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Doonhamer1969 said: Troon's statement is that good,other clubs are quoting it now . Yea, I noticed that Talbot and Meadow have linked to it Edited March 30, 2020 by honestman54 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theesel1994 Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 Largs Thistle linked to it after they'd issued their statement as well. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.