Jump to content

Junior football, what is the future?


Burnie_man

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Ginaro said:
 

@theesel1994 apart from the lack of floodlights, how much other work would need to be done at Largs ground for licensing?

The away changing room would need enlarged. A proper changing room for Refs and Assistants. Disabled access and area in the stand. I think the club were going to be doing things regards disabled access anyway. The same with the refs room. So they would be done even if the club remains in the Juniors. To be honest I think it would be quite far off for Licensing. I think all the other form filling stuff would need looked at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, ArabAuslander said:

Okay here me out here for a second, Scotland benefits quite well in this because we a) have smaller league and b) regionalise very low down in our pyramid.

For example 42 clubs play in Two Leagues in Portugal, but play in four in Scotland.

England are the only country that could probably be regarded as better than Scotland and even then Kelty Hearts gave a very good account of themselves against Solihull Moors this season (both were top of Tier 5 at the time)

The German sixth tier is down at the state or Laender level: It is the top level of the state leagues before promotion to the Oberligas. The current Tier 6 leaders in Berlin are Sparta Lichtenberg and play there games in what looks like a local council 3G https://www.sv-sparta.de/video/freistoss_johannisthal.mp4 Website here: http://www.sv-sparta.de/

The French sixth tier is down at the Province level and very little info can be found. One random team I found at that level was US Montagnarde of the Breton league. Looks like they get under 100 to there games 

In Spain there are 620 teams at tier 5, so the level at Tier 6 is going to be worse than Scotland. In Italy there are 866 teams in the 6th Tier, playing below a 5th tier of 464.

I could go on.

 

I think you're  perhaps (inadvertently?) highlighting a major flaw with the league structure in Scotland.

In football across Europe the pyramid is spread out at the base - regionalised much higher up the structure. So in Spain, as you point out, it is very broad at T5, whereas here it is still linear like a column - not strong.

I think we have too many 'pro' clubs and at least one, maybe two leagues too many, and it should be regionalised at T4. 

In the context of European football, with the exception of our top 2 clubs (never mind the top 2 leagues even), our clubs are not competitive.

And compared to other small (wealthy) countries our national team has massively underperformed - the last 20 years we have endured failure after failure after failure.

And here we are still debating the demise of the Junior 'grade' of football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, surely not! said:

It’s a fair point but the fact that the question hasn’t been resolved one way of another is a genuine shame for the game in Scotland

 

Totally agree - although I'd be quite surprised if the question is still being asked this time next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AlanCamelonfan said:

Again ur record against east teams is in cup competitions. Linlithgow had a great record against east teams look where they are now.

That's fine stay out the pyramid and Scottish cup then if you dont want to be it that's whole point of setting up the wosfl so you can stay junior or go

I get it now, it's because we gubbed you in this season's Scottish...another East team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it’s abit silly really to be comparing our league structure to that of others, if your not looking fully into the details then it’s very easy to draw up odd conclusions. One of the worst(and yet most common) is companion to England.  You see people mentioning that clubs up here shouldn’t be playing nationally when England only has 3 times the clubs playing nationally despite being 10 times the population.   But it completely ignores that the national league north has clubs of similar size to our league 2 playing over a larger area.  

You get similar mistakes comparing with Europe. Yes Spain regionalises very early, but those regions can be absolutely huge. 

You can look at Netherlands or Belgium but there strong politics in those countries, they aren’t creating perfect systems.

You also can end up comparing with structures with vastly different histories.  When large chunks of Europe have had national leagues for Half (or less) as long as us then it’s not a right to  compare.

Each nation can only create what’s right for themselves, as things stand we seem to be approaching the correct structure for tiers 1-6.

we can argue over what happens if as expected the lowland region gains a lot of licensed clubs and this results in a significant disparity with the HL. Should it split? should it get some form of weighting to increase the likelihood of promotion? Let’s discuss.

theres absolutely no debate over scrapping the national status of full time clubs like rovers/Falkirk/Airdrie, none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, parsforlife said:

I think it’s abit silly really to be comparing our league structure to that of others.

theres absolutely no debate over scrapping the national status of full time clubs like rovers/Falkirk/Airdrie, none.

You have to look at what other countries do  successfully and try to learn from it - league structure is just one example.

If we had a 12 team top league and 14 or 16 1st division perhaps those clubs you mention would still be in it... the rest below them though in L1 and L2, in the grand scheme of things... really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, TheDemon said:

So from what i'm hearing, we have at least 5 South of Scotland teams interested; Bonnyton, Threave, Newton, Saints and Mids. 

How seriously should we take that rumour?

If true, and they were to leave, it would leave the SOS pretty short.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheDemon said:

So from what i'm hearing, we have at least 5 South of Scotland teams interested; Bonnyton, Threave, Newton, Saints and Mids. 

I am a bit confused, and that doesn't happen a lot, honest

Why would any team want to leave a tier 6 league to join another tier 6 league when allegedly the one they are in is viewed as a weaker league. meaning if they want to progress then they have a great chance at the league they are in than joining what most people expect to be a stronger league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bestsinceslicebread said:

I am a bit confused, and that doesn't happen a lot, honest

Why would any team want to leave a tier 6 league to join another tier 6 league when allegedly the one they are in is viewed as a weaker league. meaning if they want to progress then they have a great chance at the league they are in than joining what most people expect to be a stronger league.

Maybe they think they're not going to go up to Lowland League anyway and looking at the clubs that could be in WoSL they think there might be better crowds?

south-league.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...