Jump to content

Another van ploughed into folk in London


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 392
  • Created
  • Last Reply
5 minutes ago, Savage Henry said:

 

Yup. I'm more than aware that's how it gets reported. That's not claiming responsibility though. It's claiming inspiration. Again, in the context of IS, that's more than semantics. It is a gauge of the nature of IS, which is constantly in a state of flux. I could go on, but I seem to repeat myself on here a lot.

 

For people who study such things, the wording of these "claims" is highly significant. IS does not claim "credit" for everything. Far from it. It isn't claiming credit for this. Manchester was a different scenario entirely.

 

ETA I'm also not so aloof as not to realise that for most folks, the difference is irrelevant, and quite rightly so.

Aye. You say toMATEo, I say toMATTo. You say PoTATEo, absolutely no one has ever said poTATTo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Are you pulling me on my shite spellong or my shite patter?

If its the spelling, aye ok Kincardine

If its the patter, fair cop.


The patter Bairnardo, I didn't notice the spelling mistake.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: I said to the folks in the house as soon as i posted that the first person to reply would be you. What a fukin creepy b*****d you really are. Have you got me me on a constant watch so you can try to be hip and edgy to your fawning minions? Utter Nomarks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Savage Henry said:

 


Rita Katz of SITE Intel is also a good source. As is the New York Times specialist who@ictchris linked to earlier in the thread.

 

I don't think anyone knows for sure whether IS claims of responsibility are genuine until well after an event. Even Gorka, the conman Trump advisor in the Whitehouse pretends to be a an expert in the topic. The released "statement from IS" about the Manchester bombing was factually wrong in almost every respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: I said to the folks in the house as soon as i posted that the first person to reply would be you. What a fukin creepy b*****d you really are. Have you got me me on a constant watch so you can try to be hip and edgy to your fawning minions? Utter Nomarks.


Heads gone.











Thief.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, supermik said:

:lol: I said to the folks in the house as soon as i posted that the first person to reply would be you. What a fukin creepy b*****d you really are. Have you got me me on a constant watch so you can try to be hip and edgy to your fawning minions? Utter Nomarks.

I hope "the folks in the house" laughed at you and asked why you were telling them about who you thought was going to reply to a post of yours on an Internet forum, you said thieving f**k. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...