Donathan Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Elizabeth is absolutely not a wid. However all of the women on the losing team are. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donathan Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 The two guys are both going here surely. Andrew for fucking up the task and Charles for poor performance throughout the process. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19QOS19 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 I think she's a dark horse. And a wid. Nah she's no chance. She'll be sacked when she is in the final 3 in boardroom. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmothecat2 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Think Sugar was right on Sarah-Jane. Always positioned herself so she could criticise from the sidelines but not get her hands dirty.Felt that task was designed to be semi-disastrous though. Selling a tour before you've designed the tour, having a guide who has never visited the city before and had to learn about it overnight whilst on a boat. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silvio Tattiescone Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 21 minutes ago, blackislekillie said: I think she's a dark horse. And a wid. I think she's a horse 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bert Raccoon Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 8 minutes ago, NewBornBairn said: I think she's a horse She certainly looks like she may be hiding a large cock. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karpaty Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Did that blonde lassie speak a word throughout the task? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flybhoy Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Sarah Jane is also a wid. Sad to see her go. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killie_lad Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 The ginger lassie will win it IMO, how Charles hasn't been sacked I'll never know 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meanmistermustard Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Sugar's decisions on who to fire are as idiotic as the candidates. Without any doubt, Charles should have gone yet Sugar shits himself and we have to suffer his pointless existence for another week. I would have left either tour and found my way back to the boat, or drowned myself in a canal to escape an afternoon with Elizabeth. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Minertaur Posted November 9, 2017 Author Share Posted November 9, 2017 (edited) I'd have been asking for a refund from both tours. I absolutely loved the girl saying she's not good with facts and that she's struggle with the tour. All she had to do was read a tour book, write down key bullet points. She had notes with her the whole time - what the hell was on them? You could have sacked any of the final 3. Sad to see Sarah Jane go as she was one of the better looking ones in the process. Elizabeth? She does not fall anywhere near the wid category. Once again the other Sarah appears to be the best candidate but will no doubt want to open a Greggs on the moon so won't win. EDIT - was it just me that thought that the key rings said Brussels on them? Edited November 9, 2017 by The Minertaur 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmothecat2 Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Karen Brady is continuing with her overstepping the mark as well. Needlessly causing drama instead of observing. 'We can't hear you at the back, oh? You're not talking *snigger*' 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19QOS19 Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Karen Brady is continuing with her overstepping the mark as well. Needlessly causing drama instead of observing. 'We can't hear you at the back, oh? You're not talking *snigger*' I still reckon she'll be in Sugar's place at some point. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmothecat2 Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 I still reckon she'll be in Sugar's place at some point. I really hope not, she's the worst thing about this show these days. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boghead ranter Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 5 hours ago, 19QOS19 said: I still reckon she'll be in Sugar's place at some point. 5 hours ago, Jmothecat2 said: I really hope not, she's the worst thing about this show these days. Get Claude "you're not even a fish" Littner in there! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19QOS19 Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Get Claude "you're not even a fish" Littner in there! He's not been the same since becoming an aid. His interviews were the best thing about the entire show. They aren't the same now he gets to know them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q0S-RUSH Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 22 hours ago, Karpaty said: Did that blonde lassie speak a word throughout the task? I know, That must be the easiest time anybody,s had in the boardroom that was on the losing team. She didn,t say a word and nobody said anything to her. Pure f**king wid though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smpar Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 I know, That must be the easiest time anybody,s had in the boardroom that was on the losing team. She didn,t say a word and nobody said anything to her. Pure f**king wid though. Think that might have been deliberate for the purposes of this episode. A “nothing to see here” kind of approach as she was neither great nor shite in this one, whereas plenty of people made an arse of it. Anyone who thinks Elizabeth is a wid needs their fucking head checked. Especially since they have actually heard the c**t and know what she’s like. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 I think one of the aspects that's caused the drop-off in quality is the loss of Margaret and Nick. Claude is obviously a clever, funny man but it was best that he was left to the interviews. Karren Brady is awful, she just makes horrible remarks constantly. The other day when Joanne won and started crying she said "tears of joy is it?" what's the point in that? Whatever the quality of the candidates they are obviously in a high pressure situation so are going to let it out when something like that happens. What business credentials does she have anyway? She started out flogging porn mags, before taking over Birmingham City only to run up huge debts and flog the company to someone who ended up being banged up for fraud a few years later. Now she is in charge of West Ham, a permanent dumpster fire of a club, who have just benefitted from the taxpayers building a new ground. I'd love to hear Claude Littner interview her on her business plan - "well, we're going to fleece the taxpayer for millions of quid, buy loads of utterly shite players and pay ourselves handsome bonuses on teh back of a load of angry plumbers who now live in Essex! trebles all round!" 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flybhoy Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 Karen Brady is a smarmy cow to be fair, constant catty remarks and dirty looks when no need for them, cant stand her. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.