NorthernLights Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 1 hour ago, Jmothecat2 said: Is there any clue which way it's likely to go? I thought councillor Yuill is a Yes guy. When a number of objectors tried to claim the development would ruin the sort of place Westhill is or portray it as some sort of rural paradise () he'd ask them of they agreed that Westhill had seen a fair amount of expansion over the last few decades. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmothecat2 Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 Via Aberdeen Away Days on Twitter: 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anotherchance Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 I think it'll get the thumbs up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cameron1875 Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 There's something not quite right with that picture. Far too sunny for A̶b̶e̶r̶d̶e̶e̶n̶ Kingsford. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 I didn't watch any of the hearing. Can somebody please explain what the terrorist/ pipeline based objection is all about. I am very concerned. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiG Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 I didn't watch any of the hearing. Can somebody please explain what the terrorist/ pipeline based objection is all about. I am very concerned. The protest group have raised the stadiums close proximity to the pipeline as a reason for refusal as they think that the construction of the ground could cause damage to the pipeline which could lead to problems i.e. it explodes. But the owner of the pipeline, who I think is BP, have said they've no concerns. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthernLights Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 55 minutes ago, coprolite said: I didn't watch any of the hearing. Can somebody please explain what the terrorist/ pipeline based objection is all about. I am very concerned. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Thanks both.I'll watch that at lunch.In a sane world, the pipeline thing should demonstrate that the group raises invalid objections and can be safely ignored. on the other hand...... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 I just watched that video up to the part where he shows the video of the pipeline on fire "Dude, what the f**k!" Ha His argument seems to be that there are exclusion zones around the pipelines that the stadium falls outwith. Everyone, including Health & Safety, BP, Shell, the planners etc agree that there is no risk to the pipelines from the proposed development but because these exclusion zones don't take into account the threat of terrorism then they are invalid and should be reassessed i.e. made bigger so that, rather conveniently, there wouldn't be room for the proposed development . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Why don't we just close all public places due to the risk of terrorism 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz FFC Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 I believe we have a pipeline running into BP at our ground. Don't remember it ever being brought up during planning permission. The blast zone however 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suspect Device Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 10 hours ago, Bully Wee Villa said: There's something not quite right with that picture. Far too sunny for A̶b̶e̶r̶d̶e̶e̶n̶ Kingsford. Hey. Aberdeen is one of the sunniest places in Scotland. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4202571.stm They weren't talking about our sunny disposition obviously. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigmouth Strikes Again Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Top trolling from the bold Ballantyne. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthernLights Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Here is another NIMBY roaster... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmothecat2 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 I just watched that video up to the part where he shows the video of the pipeline on fire "Dude, what the f**k!" Ha His argument seems to be that there are exclusion zones around the pipelines that the stadium falls outwith. Everyone, including Health & Safety, BP, Shell, the planners etc agree that there is no risk to the pipelines from the proposed development but because these exclusion zones don't take into account the threat of terrorism then they are invalid and should be reassessed i.e. made bigger so that, rather conveniently, there wouldn't be room for the proposed development . I just love them trying their best not to laugh at him. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 All this to "placate a manager" . Right you are hen. Does she say that [emoji1]£50m infrastructure project all for oor Derek. He is a good manager like. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2pac Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 #allfordeek 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reina Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 I'm allfordeek, to be fair. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RussellAnderson Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 I'm more for Deek than I am for Aurora. But then I'm more for Deek than I am for my own legs. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.