Dawson Park Boy Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 27 minutes ago, Highlandmagyar Tier 3 said: Yep. Confirmed. You are a Rangers fan. On that basis, I suppose I am a fan just like I am of Sunderland and Barnet - good friends are supporters and I watch how they’re doing. Similarly, I had a neighbour who was Chairman of Rangers, Falkirk and Dundee at various times. My point is that you can be a fan of a number of teams with varying degrees of allegiance. My first allegiance is to my local, home town team and always will be. Absolutely no problem. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highlandmagar Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 3 minutes ago, Dawson Park Boy said: On that basis, I suppose I am a fan just like I am of Sunderland and Barnet - good friends are supporters and I watch how they’re doing. Similarly, I had a neighbour who was Chairman of Rangers, Falkirk and Dundee at various times. My point is that you can be a fan of a number of teams with varying degrees of allegiance. My first allegiance is to my local, home town team and always will be. Absolutely no problem. Aye Right! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O'Kelly Isley III Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 On that basis, I suppose I am a fan just like I am of Sunderland and Barnet - good friends are supporters and I watch how they’re doing. Similarly, I had a neighbour who was Chairman of Rangers, Falkirk and Dundee at various times. My point is that you can be a fan of a number of teams with varying degrees of allegiance. My first allegiance is to my local, home town team and always will be. Absolutely no problem.I have a huge seashell collection, I keep it all over the world. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pocketman Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 5 hours ago, Dawson Park Boy said: On that basis, I suppose I am a fan just like I am of Sunderland and Barnet - good friends are supporters and I watch how they’re doing. Similarly, I had a neighbour who was Chairman of Rangers, Falkirk and Dundee at various times. My point is that you can be a fan of a number of teams with varying degrees of allegiance. My first allegiance is to my local, home town team and always will be. Absolutely no problem. same here. I have varying degrees of allegiance to Rangers, Hearts, Linfield and Millwall. Nothing wrong with that and says nothing about me! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 same here. I have varying degrees of allegiance to Rangers, Hearts, Linfield and Millwall. Nothing wrong with that and says nothing about me!. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamthebam Posted March 22, 2021 Share Posted March 22, 2021 I know they drag him out to comment on UK polls too but is there another expert psephologist out there other than that old twat Curtice? The SNP could have 99% in polls and he'd still say support is slipping or they won't form a majority etc. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pocketman Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 Call Kaye is car crash stuff. Kaye behaving in her expected normal neutral manner - if you didn't hear the outcome yesterday you would think that the independent report found the FM guilt of misleading Parliament. Guy calls in and mentions double standards in the Tory (and BBC) approach/reporting compared to what goes on at Westminster and the media reaction to it. Kaye shoots him down by saying we are solely talking about sexual misconduct in Scotland and the SG's mishandling of it. Next caller mentions Patel and Adams reaction is clear annoyance. Most call-in programmes evolve in line with what the callers consider applicable - Adams ensures we stay on (her) point. Clear direction that context and comparisons are only applicable if it makes the SG looks bad - no other conclusion can be drawn. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 It's amazing why all the people on twitter don't just complain directly to Ofcom. I'd imagine you'd easily get more complaints than Morgan got 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pocketman Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 20 minutes ago, John Lambies Doos said: It's amazing why all the people on twitter don't just complain directly to Ofcom. I'd imagine you'd easily get more complaints than Morgan got OfCom bat them away if the complaint hasn't gone to the BBC first for them to provide you with their standard automatic response: The BBC has met the standards in the Broadcasting Code We received just over 3,000 complaints about the BBC's content standards in 2019/20. Most of these complaints (over 2,700) were referred back to the BBC as they had not completed the BBC's complaints process (known as 'BBC First'). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 Sky this morning https://twitter.com/itsbeats/status/1374291401907785731?s=19 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukDukGoose Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 7 hours ago, doulikefish said: Sky this morning https://twitter.com/itsbeats/status/1374291401907785731?s=19 Seems Blackford has accepted the explanation and has asked everyone to move on. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MP_MFC Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 Call Kaye is car crash stuff. Kaye behaving in her expected normal neutral manner - if you didn't hear the outcome yesterday you would think that the independent report found the FM guilt of misleading Parliament. Guy calls in and mentions double standards in the Tory (and BBC) approach/reporting compared to what goes on at Westminster and the media reaction to it. Kaye shoots him down by saying we are solely talking about sexual misconduct in Scotland and the SG's mishandling of it. Next caller mentions Patel and Adams reaction is clear annoyance. Most call-in programmes evolve in line with what the callers consider applicable - Adams ensures we stay on (her) point. Clear direction that context and comparisons are only applicable if it makes the SG looks bad - no other conclusion can be drawn. I had it on briefly today, I say briefly because when the first caller, apparently a life time SNP voter, said he thought they sturgeon and murrell were the current day equivalent of Snowball and Napoleon from animal farm, I couldnae any more. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 47 minutes ago, MP_MFC said: 14 hours ago, KingRocketman II said: Call Kaye is car crash stuff. Kaye behaving in her expected normal neutral manner - if you didn't hear the outcome yesterday you would think that the independent report found the FM guilt of misleading Parliament. Guy calls in and mentions double standards in the Tory (and BBC) approach/reporting compared to what goes on at Westminster and the media reaction to it. Kaye shoots him down by saying we are solely talking about sexual misconduct in Scotland and the SG's mishandling of it. Next caller mentions Patel and Adams reaction is clear annoyance. Most call-in programmes evolve in line with what the callers consider applicable - Adams ensures we stay on (her) point. Clear direction that context and comparisons are only applicable if it makes the SG looks bad - no other conclusion can be drawn. I had it on briefly today, I say briefly because when the first caller, apparently a life time SNP voter, said he thought they sturgeon and murrell were the current day equivalent of Snowball and Napoleon from animal farm, I couldnae any more. I hope the host pointed out that Snowball and Napoleon were not real people and that Animal Farm is a shite book written for children. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Venom Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 Boris Johnson getting some heat this morning for the vaccine being so successful due to capitalism and greed comments to Tory back benchers.Laura Kuenssburg doing her best to massage this by claiming it was a joke (explained to her by an MP, natch) aimed at Mark Spencer who was demolishing cheese and pickle during the meeting."Believe it or not, the Conservative Party's boss of discipline, Mark Spencer, has been christened with the nickname 'Big Farmer', like 'Big Pharma' - the pharmaceutical companies."Some laugh. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Have some faith in Magic Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 6 minutes ago, Jeff Venom said: Boris Johnson getting some heat this morning for the vaccine being so successful due to capitalism and greed comments to Tory back benchers. Laura Kuenssburg doing her best to massage this by claiming it was a joke (explained to her by an MP, natch) aimed at Mark Spencer who was demolishing cheese and pickle during the meeting. "Believe it or not, the Conservative Party's boss of discipline, Mark Spencer, has been christened with the nickname 'Big Farmer', like 'Big Pharma' - the pharmaceutical companies." Some laugh. Sounds like perfect Si Ferry podcast material. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 29 minutes ago, Jeff Venom said: Boris Johnson getting some heat this morning for the vaccine being so successful due to capitalism and greed comments to Tory back benchers. Laura Kuenssburg doing her best to massage this by claiming it was a joke (explained to her by an MP, natch) aimed at Mark Spencer who was demolishing cheese and pickle during the meeting. "Believe it or not, the Conservative Party's boss of discipline, Mark Spencer, has been christened with the nickname 'Big Farmer', like 'Big Pharma' - the pharmaceutical companies." Some laugh. Surely it's for Boris Johnson to do an embarrassing press conference to explain his comments rather than the chief political editor of the BBC trying to cover his back. Actually ridiculous how much she does that is completely wrong in terms of professional standards. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 4 minutes ago, 101 said: Surely it's for Boris Johnson to do an embarrassing press conference to explain his comments rather than the chief political editor of the BBC trying to cover his back. Actually ridiculous how much she does that is completely wrong in terms of professional standards. I'm not normally one for the BBC bias stuff but it is unbelievable having journalists that don't even engage the notion that what is said by politicians in private might be more believable than the pish they talk at a podium. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawson Park Boy Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 35 minutes ago, Jeff Venom said: Boris Johnson getting some heat this morning for the vaccine being so successful due to capitalism and greed comments to Tory back benchers. Laura Kuenssburg doing her best to massage this by claiming it was a joke (explained to her by an MP, natch) aimed at Mark Spencer who was demolishing cheese and pickle during the meeting. "Believe it or not, the Conservative Party's boss of discipline, Mark Spencer, has been christened with the nickname 'Big Farmer', like 'Big Pharma' - the pharmaceutical companies." Some laugh. I agree with Johnson. Why be afraid of capitalism. One of the driving forces of capitalism is greed and why not? As long as it is contained within rules and regulations capitalism and greed are forces for good. What would life be like without Silicon Valley? What do you think drives Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 I agree with Johnson. Why be afraid of capitalism. One of the driving forces of capitalism is greed and why not? As long as it is contained within rules and regulations capitalism and greed are forces for good. What would life be like without Silicon Valley? What do you think drives Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk? Of course you would as you are a cretinous c**t and as if to prove the point you cite two of earth's most cretinous c***s as shining examples. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G51 Posted March 24, 2021 Share Posted March 24, 2021 5 minutes ago, Dawson Park Boy said: I agree with Johnson. Why be afraid of capitalism. One of the driving forces of capitalism is greed and why not? As long as it is contained within rules and regulations capitalism and greed are forces for good. What would life be like without Silicon Valley? What do you think drives Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk? this is clearly a weak trolling attempt, so i will respond in kind: 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.